Bapuji's low income

Today jhooladevi ranted bapuji earn only 400 rupees which is nothing in today's world but bapuji would be from 1960 or 1970 era or tab 100 rupay ke value thi logo ki sal 100 ke digit me hoti thi , or zindagi asani se guzar jati thi , Bapuji still is getting his pension as he not unemployed yet.

Bapuji bought d land of shah house & made 1 BHK set which was enough for one couple & 2 kids , vanraj later developed d house in double storey house .

If bapuji was poor then why did jhooladevi married him she would have refused to marry him , I guess baa belong to more poor family then bapuji.

Baa is just a b🤬🤬🤬h...

There is no logic in her rant ... absolutely non....like seriously wrongly comparing money value

Baa ko common sense nahi hai ! It is very difficult to go from a kaccha house to pakka house, voh toh aage ki baad hai ki kitne rooms hai etc.

Every subsequent generation obviously builds on what their previous generation left. Vanraj could get an education because Bapuji sent him to school. Vanraj could get that job because he's educated. I'm not sure if Baapuji received formal education. Vanraj still respects Bapuji because he actually taught him something. How can the size of a house be any measure of your worth?

and yes 400 in that era is a LOT! considering inflation etc etc it comes to be 32k per month. I don't think anyone earning 32k per month is living in poverty by any means. Did Leela actually think their money And Karkhana value wouldn't appreciate over time 😆

Ek. Greedy ke liye 1 crore ki bhi koi value nahin hoti. . If bapiuji ki low income thi. Ghar ka खर्चा nahin chal raha tha to baa hi khuch kaam karti aur income badhane ki koshish karti

There is ome of my relative whose husband is of very poor finacial condtion but his wife help in increaing income by selling moti ki maala. Aur woh raat mein jaag jaag ke moti ki maalayain banati th. By god Grace aaj unki finacial condtiion achi hai. So imstead of blamimg husband for being poor. She also did work in increaing income