What makes the world go round ?? - Page 4

Nice write up. Yes, real life needs both. Money needed to take care of family's needs, social status etc, family to provide a sense of purpose, to be loved, cared for etc. I am very okay as long as both the parties learn something, anything.

But, having said the above, Pallavi's inherent concern & love for Raghav should come out on the top, right now for me, he has become a project for her, which she has undertaken, the end result of this for her is to make Raghav fit into her so called ideals of her moral fabric. At least that's how I felt after hearing her speak.

Pallavi needs to take a slow & cautious approach & have dialogues with him instead of antagonising him, making him react & retort sharply. She is well versed with his pain & trauma so why the unnecessary confrontation? Also she needs to reflect upon Farhad's words & Harish taking the blame. No doubts she has his best interests in her heart, but her method is only going to wake up his inner defensive self, who after undergoing so much of trauma & guilt will not see her best interests but react to her actions & words.

I have absolutely no faith in the writers, they don't know to balance. It's always all or nothing at all shoved on the screen.But let's see.

Sai Ketan owns the screen & attention. Tremendously improved over these months.

Originally posted by: Shakti1604

Nice write up. Yes, real life needs both. Money needed to take care of family's needs, social status etc, family to provide a sense of purpose, to be loved, cared for etc. I am very okay as long as both the parties learn something, anything.

But, having said the above, Pallavi's inherent concern & love for Raghav should come out on the top, right now for me, he has become a project for her, which she has undertaken, the end result of this for her is to make Raghav fit into her so called ideals of her moral fabric. At least that's how I felt after hearing her speak.

Pallavi needs to take a slow & cautious approach & have dialogues with him instead of antagonising him, making him react & retort sharply. She is well versed with his pain & trauma so why the unnecessary confrontation? Also she needs to reflect upon Farhad's words & Harish taking the blame. No doubts she has his best interests in her heart, but her method is only going to wake up his inner defensive self, who after undergoing so much of trauma & guilt will not see her best interests but react to her actions & words.

I have absolutely no faith in the writers, they don't know to balance. It's always all or nothing at all shoved on the screen.But let's see.

Sai Ketan owns the screen & attention. Tremendously improved over these months.

@bold, this is how it's coming across now and it's creating further disconnect with many viewers. They may agree that he has to stop his illegal activities but cannot relate to her moral science lectures and heavy-handed ways of trying to make him conform.

Originally posted by: inlieu

@bold, this is how it's coming across now and it's creating further disconnect with many viewers. They may agree that he has to stop his illegal activities but cannot relate to her moral science lectures and heavy-handed ways of trying to make him conform.