different scene, agree. It served no purpose other than showing Raghav how evil Mandy is, but they already did the burning saree part this was unnecessary.Originally posted by: farheenbachani
I am not victim blaming Pallavi. Im blaming the scene itself. The choice of that scene. It was not logical. She knows there are two creepy men in the house. To come out in open while doing her sari pleat is not ok. She might have done that before but would u come out doing your pleats while someone in the house has made advances at you before? I dont even do sari pleats around my brother or brother in law let alone a stranger.
The writers did not use logic when creating that scene. That same scene might have worked had she been in the kitchen doing something and mandhar advanced on her etc as it woukd have flowed better with the situation.
Im not disagreeing with you, im saying the scene could have been different. The eay the scene was, the situation that presented was not logical. Nothing to do with Pallavi or the harrassment or anything of that sort.
Again, you said that point about coming out with pleats. I get the point, it's same as women should not be out late as creepy men roam. But the reverse of that is -if you go out at late as a women you are at fault. That's wrong. Similarly if you say pals should have been more careful that just feed to wrong side. You support her as a human, feel for her, angry at Mandar, that's it.