Loving the Tata Group! - Page 4

Originally posted by: loveandhope9204

That's my opinion. Aapko mirchi lagi toh hum kya karein🤣🤣

You're not just giving your opinion. You're calling audience naive, saying they have an "SSR syndrome" just because they support contestants whom you don't like.

Atleast have the decency to not joke about a dead man.

Originally posted by: AwaamKiJaan

You're not just giving your opinion. You're calling audience naive, saying they have an "SSR syndrome" just because they support contestants whom you don't like.

Atleast have the decency to not joke about a dead man.

Absolutely they are naive. Which world have you been living in?😆 Get on Facebook and Twitter, you'll see it for yourself.

It has nothing to do with disrespecting the dead man, but the audience that use the Commoners Vs Elite mindset.

Calling it SSR Syndrome is not disrespecting a dead man.🤣 If you call it disrespecting a dead man, then that's just your way of trying to gaslight the focus away from the actual meaning of the point.

Originally posted by: loveandhope9204

Absolutely they are naive. Which world have you been living in?😆 Get on Facebook and Twitter, you'll see it for yourself.

It has nothing to do with disrespecting the dead man, but the audience that use the Commoners Vs Elite mindset.

Calling it SSR Syndrome is not disrespecting a dead man.🤣That's just your way of trying to gaslight the focus away from the actual meaning of the point.

I've been living in this world only and no I don't see why supporters of a certain group of contestants have to be termed as naive.

The tata-bata thing is not even that big of a deal like you're making it out to be. It's only Akshara who makes a big deal about her background and she's not the only one from the bata group.

And yes, you're disrespecting Sushant maybe unintentionally, but still doing it by dragging his name on a show which has nothing to do with him. What's the need of calling it SSR syndrome? Okay maybe audience supports people who come from a more humble background. But that happened even before Sushant's death.

No need of dragging his name again and again and calling it a syndrome.

Originally posted by: AwaamKiJaan

I've been living in this world only and no I don't see why supporters of a certain group of contestants have to be termed as naive.

The tata-bata thing is not even that big of a deal like you're making it out to be. It's only Akshara who makes a big deal about her background and she's not the only one from the bata group.

And yes, you're disrespecting Sushant maybe unintentionally, but still doing it by dragging his name on a show which has nothing to do with him. What's the need of calling it SSR syndrome? Okay maybe audience supports people who come from a more humble background. But that happened even before Sushant's death.

No need of dragging his name again and again and calling it a syndrome.

That's my way of calling things as they are, if you don't like it, I can't help it. Move on. The whole Commoners Vs Elite debate thing may have existed from way before SSR's death, but it got highlighted and blown out of proportion after his passing away - to the point that SSR's death is now remembered synonymously to the nepotism & commoners Vs Elite debate. It maybe sad for you to hear, but that's what it's made into. That's facts for us.

Besides, No. The Tata-Bata thing and the 'We're humble commoners card' is not solely exploited by Akshara. But by Akshara, Pratik and Moose from what I've seen in the past episodes. Nishant and Pratik were the ones to openly announce the 'Tata - Bata' distinction in the past episodes, to which Neha took offense right from the start. She had an argument with Pratik about that as well. So they are playing that card, they know what it means and that's a great way of getting the audience's attention and support.

Originally posted by: loveandhope9204

That's my way of calling things as they are, if you don't like it, I can't help it. Move on. The whole Commoners Vs Elite debate thing may have existed from way before SSR's death, but it got highlighted and blown out of proportion after his passing away - to the point that SSR's death is now remembered synonymously to the nepotism & commoners Vs Elite debate. It maybe sad for you to hear, but that's what it's made into. That's facts for us.

Besides, No. The Tata-Bata thing and the 'We're humble commoners card' is not solely exploited by Akshara. But by Akshara, Pratik and Moose from what I've seen in the past episodes. Nishant and Pratik were the ones to openly announced the 'Tata - Bata' distinction in the past episodes, to which Neha took offense right from the start. She had an argument with Pratik about that as well. So they are playing that card, they know what it means and that's a great way of getting the audience's attention and support.

Well of course I can't help someone who wants to go my way or the highway. But the FACT remains that Sushant Singh Rajput is not part of this show. But you're still continuously using his name, making a joke out of it by adding his name to a syndrome.

You didn't need to use his name but you're still doing it. That's all a fact. Maybe you think it's funny but I think it's sick. That's my opinion.

SSR debate is not remembered as "commoners vs elite". It's "star kids vs outsiders". Don't change facts to suit your argument. Only star-kid in the house is Shamita Shetty. So there is no "SSR syndrome" atleast.

The bata group might have started the distinction by bringing the whole "Tata-Bata" thing in the house, but it never got into that serious level to divide the house into two parts. I don't remember Pratik or Moose ever talking about their humble background. If they did, it's not enough to claim that they're using it to gain sympathy from the audience.

Originally posted by: AwaamKiJaan

Well of course I can't help someone who wants to go my way or the highway. But the FACT remains that Sushant Singh Rajput is not part of this show. But you're still continuously using his name, making a joke out of it by adding his name to a syndrome.

You didn't need to use his name but you're still doing it. That's all a fact. Maybe you think it's funny but I think it's sick. That's my opinion.

SSR debate is not remembered as "commoners vs elite". It's "star kids vs outsiders". Don't change facts to suit your argument. Only star-kid in the house is Shamita Shetty. So there is no "SSR syndrome" atleast.

The bata group might have started the distinction by bringing the whole "Tata-Bata" thing in the house, but it never got into that serious level to divide the house into two parts. I don't remember Pratik or Moose ever talking about their humble background. If they did, it's not enough to claim that they're using it to gain sympathy from the audience.

You can call it sick all you want, I don't care for your opinion. 😆

When you talk about 'star kids', who exactly do you think star kids refer to? The ones that are picked up from the road and Bastis? The ones that walked into movies because they're from 'humble' background?

For you to reduce the 'star kids' association solely to folks being born into celebrity families, is ignorance as best to me. 'Star Kids' - the very term here screams Elite to the commoners out there, who try everyday with sweat and blood, walking miles in Mumbai, giving auditions with every ABC Ad agencies to get noticed.

So Star Kids here, does not solely refer to folks being born into star families, but refers to those kids having Elite privileges benefitting from such connections. Much like how Aristocracy works. Elite upbringing, elite privileges, elite opportunities / chances, elite circles etc. within the film industry and of a different class strata within the industry.

The Tata group has been in the industry for longer than the Bata group (except for Nishant from the Bata group). The Tata group has friends / connections from within the industry. This gets to the Bata group😆

The raw and unfiltered 'blood-bath competitive' nature of Pratik to be seen and noticed, to intimidate, the insecure outbursts and projections of Akshara's 'UP waali vs them English speaking folks', Moose's mentions of 'them senior folks vs Us', Nishant and Pratik's declaration of Tata Vs Bata, is sufficient for me to reach the conclusion of the Bata group wanting to play the victim card and the commoners Vs elite card. 😆

It may not be sufficient enough for you to reach that conclusion, and you're free to not believe that. Do I care? That's your opinion. I am not going to change mine based on your's.

Pratik Aunty ka Sada hua shakal after Zeeshan and Divya won🤣

Pratik thinking to himself :

*Itna tod phod kiya.*

*Furniture pheka paani mein.*

*Phir wahi furniture ko paani se utaaya*.

* Phir maine apne upar paint dalwa di, Zeeshan se.*

*Zeeshan jiske saath mein Preeshan banne wala tha, usse mukka marwaane pe aagaya*

*Mere wajah se Nishant eliminate ho gaya*

*Divya jiske saath meri banti nahi, aur Zeeshan jisne mera baand bajaya, woh sabse zyada sahi blocks ke saath game complete kar paaye*

*Divya and Zeeshan t-shirtless wala, jiski shakal mujhe nai pasand Captain ban gaye*

*Mere entertainment se socha log khush ho jaayenge, par teek-taak hi dubara hua*

*Matlab gas ki supply sirf char gante ki. Matlab Main entertainment hero se zero banna*

*Matlab Mein audience ko ullu banna nahi paaya*

*Matlab Mera popat bhi hua, aur gas bhi katam*

Originally posted by: loveandhope9204

You can call it sick all you want, I don't care for your opinion. 😆

When you talk about 'star kids', who exactly do you think star kids refer to? The ones that are picked up from the road and Bastis? The ones that walked into movies because they're from 'humble' background?

For you to reduce the 'star kids' association solely to folks being born into celebrity families, is ignorance as best to me. 'Star Kids' - the very term here screams Elite to the commoners out there, who try everyday with sweat and blood, walking miles in Mumbai, giving auditions with every ABC Ad agencies to get noticed.

So Star Kids here, does not solely refer to folks being born into star families, but refers to those kids having Elite privileges benefitting from such connections. Much like how Aristocracy works. Elite upbringing, elite privileges, elite opportunities / chances, elite circles etc. within the film industry and of a different class strata within the industry.

The Tata group has been in the industry for longer than the Bata group (except for Nishant from the Bata group). The Tata group has friends / connections from within the industry. This gets to the Bata group😆

The raw and unfiltered 'blood-bath competitive' nature of Pratik to be seen and noticed, to intimidate, the insecure outbursts and projections of Akshara's 'UP waali vs them English speaking folks', Moose's mentions of 'them senior folks vs Us', Nishant and Pratik's declaration of Tata Vs Bata, is sufficient for me to reach the conclusion of the Bata group wanting to play the victim card and the commoners Vs elite card. 😆

It may not be sufficient enough for you to reach that conclusion, and you're free to not believe that. Do I care? That's your opinion. I am not going to change mine based on your's.

Star kids are those who have connections in the industry through their parents or siblings or any family member.

That's what I think when I think about star-kids. Nothing more or less. Obviously star-kids would have elite privileges, upbringing, connections etc, but outsiders too can get those privileges and connections once they enter the industry.

The tata group if they have these connections, they have made it through their own effort except Shamita Shetty.

You're giving your spin to things to justify why you're continuously using Sushant's name but seriously, not working. You're saying you don't care but the way you're trying to justify yourself, I think you do. I'll say it again. Sushant is not part of the show so using his name again and again as a joke, especially when the guy is dead is nothing but sick!

As for playing victim card, obviously audience is more inclined to support the bata group which consists of only four people instead of tata which have seven people.

Audience supports the minority. Same with Divya. She's playing solo, so her support has increased since her bashing from Kjo.

I'm not asking you to change your opinion. I'm not that dumb to expect that. I'm just requesting you to stop using Sushant's name and if possible, going on fans of contestants whom you don't like.

Bash contestants all you want. I don't care.

Originally posted by: AwaamKiJaan

Star kids are those who have connections in the industry through their parents or siblings or any family member.

That's what I think when I think about star-kids. Nothing more or less. Obviously star-kids would have elite privileges, upbringing, connections etc, but outsiders too can get those privileges and connections once they enter the industry.

The tata group if they have these connections, they have made it through their own effort except Shamita Shetty.

You're giving your spin to things to justify why you're continuously using Sushant's name but seriously, not working. You're saying you don't care but the way you're trying to justify yourself, I think you do. I'll say it again. Sushant is not part of the show so using his name again and again as a joke, especially when the guy is dead is nothing but sick!

As for playing victim card, obviously audience is more inclined to support the bata group which consists of only four people instead of tata which have seven people.

Audience supports the minority. Same with Divya. She's playing solo, so her support has increased since her bashing from Kjo.

I'm not asking you to change your opinion. I'm not that dumb to expect that. I'm just requesting you to stop using Sushant's name and if possible, going on fans of contestants whom you don't like.

Bash contestants all you want. I don't care.

Why don't you read my post again?

When I elaborated on my point, it was plainly because I wanted to share my thought process. I wanted to do that. Everyone's free to share and express here.

When it comes to me saying 'I don't care' - I referred to the fact that I don't care if my points work for you or not. I don't care if you buy into them or not. Nobody's my Mummy ji here, that I have to sell my view to them.😆Expressing is different from convincing. Not too hard to understand.

Secondly, I don't find anything offending in calling it the SSR syndrome and neither do I feel sick about it. I don't see it that way and I don't find it to be as big a deal as you seem to be making of it. I might give your request a thought later.

When it comes to your explanation of why the audience supports Bata group, I do agree to some extent on your point about the natural inclination towards minority that folks have, but I don't still rest my case about Bata group playing the victim card / Elite Vs Commoner card and now with Akshara's weekly outbursts - the sanskaari Vs non-sanskaari card. I am repeating myself yet again - You needn't buy into my opinion. I needn't buy into your's.

Originally posted by: loveandhope9204

Why don't you read my post again?

When I elaborated on my point, it was plainly because I wanted to share my thought process. I wanted to do that. Everyone's free to share and express here.

When it comes to me saying 'I don't care' - I referred to the fact that I don't care if my points work for you or not. I don't care if you buy into them or not. Nobody's my Mummy ji here, that I have to sell my view to them.😆Expressing is different from convincing. Not too hard to understand.

Secondly, I don't find anything offending in calling it the SSR syndrome and neither do I feel sick about it. I don't see it that way and I don't find it to be as big a deal as you seem to be making of it. I might give your request a thought later.

When it comes to your explanation of why the audience supports Bata group, I do agree to some extent on your point about the natural inclination towards minority that folks have, but I don't still rest my case about Bata group playing the victim card / Elite Vs Commoner card and now with Akshara's weekly outbursts - the sanskaari Vs non-sanskaari card. I am repeating myself yet again - You needn't buy into my opinion. I needn't buy into your's.

I don't need to read your post again. I know everyone is free to share and express. But only you can tell if you were expressing or trying to convince. I don't know and I can't tell but I felt that you were trying to convince me.

Otherwise no need to say "I don't care", because why would anyone care what an anonymous stranger thinks about you? Saying "I don't care", sounds defensive for no reason to me.

Of course you don't find anything offending in using the term "SSR syndrome". That's why you're using it, despite the fact that he has nothing to do with the show, and the guy is dead, so using this term as a joke is clearly insensitive and disrespectful, not to forget unnecessary. Yeah really think about it.

As for Tata-Bata, yeah don't buy my opinion. I'm not buying yours either.