Here the silent of him is the verdict. Why a wife would stay or let the people do character assassination of her when her own husband could not speak or trust her ? The reason is Sita was doubted because she lived as a victim in Ravan kingdom, bon is going through the same. TM ka ghar ravan ki lanka hai ...
Ani fault is he didn't clear the misunderstanding. His silence in the panchayat is a plus point to the people who are against her. Man mei kuch bhi bole ...But Jab bolna tha tab ni bola ...
I like the connection of TM's house being like Raavan's Lanka. However, Anirudh is nowhere like Lord Rama and Bon is not giving any Agni Pareeksha to prove her innocence.
If this is the case, Ani should have saved her from TMs house (aka Lanka) first and then everyone should be asking her to prove her innocence, and THEN if Anirudh said to her to prove it I can accept this parallel. 👍🏼
Yes he was silent, but this case is not just about Bon. It's about Binoy, it's about the parents of those orphans and many many more. In Ramayana the Agni Pareeksha was only about Sita. It's quite different.
