Originally posted by: parboni
Somehow I got reminded of Baalika Vadhu today. In Baalika Vadhu we see two kids getting married,spending their entire childhood and adolescence together in good and bad. However, they don't become the soulmates that they were expected to become.
The guy goes to town for higher studies,there he meets a girl and falls in love with her. That was the first block among many block in their relationships with finally these two getting divorced but remaining friends.
I remember the tagline: kachchi umarr k pakke rishtey and how at one point the boy's father has a dialogue that goes like, "Kachche umarr k rishtey pakke nahi hote."
Why can't they show smth similar in MHRW? Mandaar doesn't need to become negative. Pallavi can get to know him,judge him for what he is, understand his perspective and still choose not to be with him.
People who want Mandy to be negative wants so because there's this notion that since he's her first husband,so he might outshine Raghav in terms of right choice for Pallavi.
Par there's no first or last,ir right and wrong choice. It's all about Pallavi's choice. And Pallavi ki choice kaun hai it's well established. I can sense her ethical dilemma, given that Mandaar is aayi's son. But he's aayi's son and someone she was married to in the past. Not her husband. Not anymore.