Why Pakhi couldn’t say no to Samrat’s mother? - Page 6

Originally posted by: msin

Totally agree .. but she’s acting the high priestess in other couples marriage issues when she herself has no spouse to show her the mirror


Today she had no business to interfere in ashwini ninad issue .. ninad was behaving like A boor .. granted she never wanted to support ashwini but atleast she could have kept quiet .. even Sonali kept quiet .. but she had to preach to ashwini ..

That’s why I said wish samrat was here to show the mirror

But that's her character, what I write and want reflects my thought process

How can I want her husband to abuse her? This is not in my thought process, I don't think husband has any power over his wife, this whole idea seems problematic to me and gives husbands the right to abuse their wives

One has to understand that everyone will tell you the reason for abusing his wife but there's absolutely no acceptable "reason" for domestic violence, not even if your wife is Pakhi, because it makes Samrat a criminal not Pakhi

Originally posted by: Sofna

@red: I'm still reeling from the shock of seeing her agree - but not before she gave her unwanted opinion, which was if her mil is over her grief over her son. The patheticness if this character is unbelievable.

@blu: I absolutely loved it when the Trimurti said nothing - esp the Kaku couldn't waggle her tongue about over Mansi bua decision

IKR

The way she used Samrat's name in front of his mother was beyond insensitive, I really don't have any expectations from this character

Originally posted by: NoraSM

But that's her character, what I write and want reflects my thought process

How can I want her husband to abuse her? This is not in my thought process, I don't think husband has any power over his wife, this whole idea seems problematic to me and gives husbands the right to abuse their wives

One has to understand that everyone will tell you the reason for abusing his wife but there's absolutely no acceptable "reason" for domestic violence, not even if your wife is Pakhi, because it makes Samrat a criminal not Pakhi

I never wanted samrat to abuse her .. if she was living in a normal relationship with her spouse she would have understood the need of not intruding in the private space of couple .. she has done that again n again in Sairat marriage .. coming out as clear third party .. so much that now virat is seeing the effect as Sai pulls up pakhi topic easily in any issue even where it is not needed..

Nobody in the house can reprimand

Pakhi that what about ur relationship with spouse .. as her said spouse is absent ..

If samrat was there u think they would have had no tiffs … like Sairat or Mohit karishma .. .. could she behave so pristinely as somebody who is perfect .. I meant that .. not him abusing his wife ..

Originally posted by: msin

Totally agree .. but she’s acting the high priestess in other couples marriage issues when she herself has no spouse to show her the mirror


Today she had no business to interfere in ashwini ninad issue .. ninad was behaving like A boor .. granted she never wanted to support ashwini but atleast she could have kept quiet .. even Sonali kept quiet .. but she had to preach to ashwini ..

That’s why I said wish samrat was here to show the mirror

Well I don't want to justify pakhi or anyone, but I believe husband wife issues should remain in between 4 walls of their room only.Bcpz when they come I front of any third person ,the issue do not remain husband wife issue.

So it's obvious when husband wife fight in living room then other will give VISHESH TIPPANI.

That's the reason no couple is happy in cn except omi kaka and his wife. They are the only happy couple in the show which I like.

Originally posted by: msin

I never wanted samrat to abuse her .. if she was living in a normal relationship with her spouse she would have understood the need of not intruding in the private space of couple .. she has done that again n again in Sairat marriage .. coming out as clear third party .. so much that now virat is seeing the effect as Sai pulls up pakhi topic easily in any issue even where it is not needed..

Nobody in the house can reprimand

Pakhi good that what about ur relationship with spouse .. as her said spouse is absent ..

If samrat was there u think they would have had no tiffs … like Sairat or Mohit karishma .. .. could she behaved so pristinely as somebody who is perfect .. I meant that .. not him abusing his wife ..

I am sorry if I misunderstood your statement

Everyone in this house puts their bedroom issues on display in front of whole house and Everyone makes remarks on married life of two individuals

IIRC Only Virat and Samrat haven't made any remarks on someone's married life

Originally posted by: NoraSM

I am sorry if I misunderstood your statement

Everyone in this house puts their bedroom issues on display in front of whole house and Everyone makes remarks on married life of two individuals

IIRC Only Virat and Samrat haven't made any remarks on someone's married life

yes of course ..

Originally posted by: NoraSM

I am sorry if I misunderstood your statement

Everyone in this house puts their bedroom issues on display in front of whole house and Everyone makes remarks on married life of two individuals

IIRC Only Virat and Samrat haven't made any remarks on someone's married life

yes of course ..

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Samrat’s mother ordered her to get ready for college function of Virat’s companion, how come she accepted it without any protest?

She didn't accept it without protest (We are unsure unless the epi airs if she reached or not). She definitely objected to it 2-3 times. But to attend or not should be her choice. But Pakhi is not someone who can get forced to do something. If she ends up reaching it's ultimately her choice. She can easily get away from Mansi bua, look at the way she brought in Samrat's name. I don't buy Pakhi can be forced to do something without her own will.

I also don’t understand how freedom is limited to a few characters

Since you have mentioned few characters I can't respond without including them. Tbh no character is given the freedom to choose. Its always been a fight or manipulation for most of them. Sai didn't want to attend Pakhis anniversary function. Virat compelled her. But at the end of the day Sai also made the choice to go. So similarly if Pakhi ends up going I will assume that as her conscious decision. Pakhi is not someone who can easily say no to things which she dislikes

If someone doesn’t want to invite, why force?

I don't think she was forced. She didn't invite Sai and that's perfectly fine because she retains the choice of whom to invite. The problem was her lying about it later. She could have said it clearly that she didn't want Sai to attend. Instead, she made it look like she wanted to but she forgot to text her. That was an insulting way to let someone know they are not invited to something. Why not clearly let the displeasure be known than lying around? Chavans thought Sai was invited. That's why Kaku asked Sai if she was not accompanying them. Pakhi is trimurtis fav. She could have let them know the true reason. But she acted sly and cunning.

If someone doesn’t want to attend a function, why force them?

Agreed.

Not related but Most of the ckts here lack freedom or will to implement their choice.

Reply in bold