Kangana - Why do her films flop? - Page 2

Whatever success she got with queen and twmr she ruined it herself

I think because she raised her acting fee twice or thrice and after that, flops...Queen was made on a very low budget as was TWM. Her hits were low-budget films if u notice.

Originally posted by: MujheMaarjaneDo

because she doesn't pair up with popular actors.

Same thing happens with guys who don't pair up with popular female actresses.

You're supposed to say a reason where we could bash and mock her.

Originally posted by: Harley_Quinn

You're supposed to say a reason where we could bash and mock her.

Not my fault people aren't creative, if somebody said what I said , I had to response in bashing/mocking manner, I would say "correct, she doesn't get to work with big stars, because B stars don't work with floppies".

Originally posted by: Tinah

I think because she raised her acting fee twice or thrice and after that, flops...Queen was made on a very low budget as was TWM. Her hits were low-budget films if u notice.

That would add to it though except for Manikarnika all her grosses since TWMR are lower than TWM's 38.5 crore 9 years ago. Queen did 61.5 crore 6 years ago.

Panga - 22,36,00,000 - Flop

Judgementall Hai - 33,95,00,000 - Flop

Manikarnika - 90,81,00,000 - Average

Simran - 14,88,75,000 - Flop

Rangoon - 20,87,00,000 - Disaster

Katti Batti - 23,75,50,000 - Flop

I Love NY - 1,19,95,000 - Disaster

Originally posted by: Anjalika01

She's a great actress but doesn't get good scripts because:

a.) She's an unconnected outsider

b.) She fought with/bashed just about everyone in Bollywood

15 years in Industry still you calls her unconnected outsider?

Originally posted by: forza

15 years in Industry still you calls her unconnected outsider?

Kangana does not has a solid pal or support in bollywood. Nobody wants to be related to someone who spews venom against everyone.

She could have become the legit female superstar if she would have chosen scripts wisely after TWMR. I saw mass audiences loved her in TWMR. She had so much positive buzz around her then. But barring Manikarnika which was not a well-made film ,In general none of her films are commercial enough.

Panga was too simple and less promoted by makers.

Judgemental was a niche film. It is a psychological thriller which hardly works in India.

Simran and Rangoon also had no mass appeal.

None of these films are bad .

Apart from that Her fees are high compare to box office pull. People are tired of her antics and don't want to watch her films. She herself ruined it all.

Originally posted by: forza

15 years in Industry still you calls her unconnected outsider?

In today’s nepo ridden Bollywood, unconnected outsiders are unconnected outsiders regardless of how long they’ve spent in the industry, unless they’ve attained superstar status or something

Originally posted by: Talis

Ah yes, very comparable careers.

Putting aside a career of blockbusters and hits on SRK's end just comparing their films since their latest clean hit - according to BOI

Zero - 88,74,50,000 - Flop

Jab Harry Met Sejal - 62,00,50,000 - Flop

Raees - 1,28,77,50,000 - Semi-Hit

Dear Zindagi - 66,46,75,000 - Semi-Hit

Fan - 84,03,25,000 - Flop

Dilwale - 1,39,97,50,000- Semi Hit

Panga - 22,36,00,000 - Flop

Judgementall Hai - 33,95,00,000 - Flop

Manikarnika - 90,81,00,000 - Average

Simran - 14,88,75,000 - Flop

Rangoon - 20,87,00,000 - Disaster

Katti Batti - 23,75,50,000 - Flop

I Love NY - 1,19,95,000 - Disaster

SRK - 3 semi-hits. 3 flops (avg B.O 95 crore)

Kangana- 1 Average - 2 Disasters, 4 flops (avg B.O. 29.7 crore)

SRK has only three flops, Kangana could have 100 flops, Why did SRK films flop?