Originally posted by: -RD-
Playing devils advocate here but Why are they expected to speak for her when she has taken names directly or indirectly and accused all three of something or the other 🤷♀️ no one goes and defends someone who just maligned them a day or two ago and wont think twice before doing it again tom!
Then it shows their stands are for quid pro quo and thus, by inference , their stands are meaningless :D
You come across as principled only if you stand up for what you believe in.. not because you like or dislike a person..
If these women want to prove that they stand for the progressive, anti female abuse etc... they would and should stand up (what kangana does or does not is not a deciding factor in standing for what is wrong)
BUT, we all know these women are shallow.. and "stand" up for something when vying for attention.. so.. yea.. indirectly Kangana again proves her points with respect to these ladies
47