Saif as Lankesh - Adipurush - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

68

Views

6.6k

Users

35

Likes

136

Frequent Posters

CholeKulche thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Jimmy Jab Games Season 8 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: MercurialMedusa

There is no Dravidian/ Aryan. It was all a well propagated myth. But even if for an argument sake we have to delve into it then.. Ravana was from North India. He was born in a village called Bisrakh in Greater Noida and was a descendent from Pulastya who was from devbhumi which is now called Uttarakhand and its actually Sri Rama who is a descendent of Ikshvaku clan which had its origins in South India.

Woah 😲 This is all news to me. I thought Ravana is from South. But did not Ram and Seeta go to deccan area for vanvas ?


Thanks for the information.😊

MercurialMedusa thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: TeluguChokri

Woah 😲 This is all news to me. I thought Ravana is from South. But did not Ram and Seeta go to deccan area for vanvas ?


Thanks for the information.😊

Because our Itihasa was systemically delegated to mythology so there are many misconceptions.. Can't blame you ya 😊


Sri Rama was a descendent of Ikshvaku clan who were from South India. But Sri Rama and his brothers were born in Ayodhya present day Uttarpradesh as Ikshvaku's moved North and established Ayodhya nagari on the banks of holy Sarayu.


And Sri Rama,Sita and Lakshmana travelled throughout Bharatakhanda the modern day India during their vanavas. They crossed Naimisaranya (north of vindhyas) and stayed in Dandakaranya (south of vindhyas) for a large part of their vanavas.

CholeKulche thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Jimmy Jab Games Season 8 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: MercurialMedusa

Because our Itihasa was systemically delegated to mythology so there are many misconceptions.. Can't blame you ya 😊


Sri Rama was a descendent of Ikshvaku clan who were from South India. But Sri Rama and his brothers were born in Ayodhya present day Uttarpradesh as Ikshvaku's moved North and established Ayodhya nagari on the banks of holy Sarayu.


And Sri Rama,Sita and Lakshmana travelled throughout Bharatakhanda the modern day India during their vanavas. They crossed Naimisaranya (north of vindhyas) and stayed in Dandakaranya (south of vindhyas) for a large part of their vanavas.

Bold- This I would agree to 100%


Thank you for the information. 🤗

Posted: 5 years ago
#34

Vishal Bhardwaj could extract a memorable performance from Saif, that was totally awesome. But Udaybhan was a very poor attempt to top Langada or remind public of that act. Saif's projects look interesting on paper, he is constantly trying to do different things. But the final product is mostly yawn yawn. I am not looking forward for Adipurush.

Ashley.Tisdale thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 5 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: TeluguChokri

Woah 😲 This is all news to me. I thought Ravana is from South. But did not Ram and Seeta go to deccan area for vanvas ?


Thanks for the information.😊

THIS IS SUPER LONG BUT WORTH THE READ.

Mercurial Medusa has already stated the imp points, I'll just go a notch deeper to clear this to show the movement of the two clans. And I am doing this coz I love our history 😆

Firstly there is no Aryan-Dravidian. That was all BS served to us by historians and the West ideology for them to appear superior. If anything there has been movement out of Bharat Khanda due to clash of ideologies or separation of population due to tectonic plate movement. This is what I feel because I've read various texts, predominantly Zoroastrian, Nordic etc. I can link each and every thing to India.

We've all originated from Brahmaji, it could be Manu, Prajapati, Manasputra etc. So its all gonna lead back to him.

There were three clans, one of Ikshvaku, one of Nimi and the other of Rishi Pulastya. Lets talk about Ikshvaku first but to understand the details I am gonna talk about his father first..

Shraddhadeva Manu also known as Satyavrata or (commonly) Vaivasvata Manu is the current Manu. Manu is known as the first man and is actually a title given to the ruler. In one DAY or KALPA of Brahmaji, there are 14 Manvantaras. Each is headed by a single Manu. We are currently in the 7th Manvantara. Thus Vaivasvata Manu is the 7th Manu.

Now Vaivasvata Manu's kingdom was situated in the Southern regions of India called the Dravida Kingdom. V.Manu (shortening his name) was warned by Matsya Avatar of Vishnu about the Great Flood. He built a boat which carried his family and the saptarishis (these too change every Manvantara). The Matsya Avatar guided them to the top of the Malaya Mountains. This is said to be in modern day Mangalore. After the Deluge, Manu's family and the seven sages repopulated the Earth. Thats why everyone had 100s of children. Both Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi dynasties came from V.Manu, but I don't want to confuse you right now.

Iskhvaku was one of the 10 sons of V.Manu who founded the Ikshvaku Dynasty. They were known as Suryavanshis since Ikshvaku's grandfather was Surya. Lord Ram belonged to this dynasty. The kingdom was Kosala Kingdom, its capital was Ayodhya. Lord Ram's lineage also called themselves Raghuvanshis after King Raghu, Ramji's great grandfather.

Next is Nimi, son of Ikshvaku. He established and founded the kingdom of Videha, commonly known as Mithila. Raja Janaka belonged to this dynasty. His adopted daughter Sita Maa along with the other three princesses were married off to Lord Rama and his brothers respectively.

Finally we come to Raavana. His father was Vishrava, grandfather was Rishi Pulastya and his great-grandfather was Brahmaji. Vishrava earned his powers through severe tapasya. Saptarishi Bharadwaja even married his daughter Ilavida to Vishrava because he was very impressed. From this union was born Kubera, the king of wealth.

Stories of Vishrava's power spread everywhere. Sumali was one of the founders of Lanka and a Daitya/Asura. He heard these tales and decided to get his daughter Kaikesi married to Vishrava. Her parents orchestrated the entire thing so that Vishrava would fall in love with Kaikesi. From this second marriage came 4 children: Ravana, Vibhishana, Kumbakarna and Shurpanakha. But because of the kids' asura genes they started behaving demonically. Vishrava returned to his first wife shortly after witnessing this.

Raavana was said to have been born in Bisrakh, a village in Uttar Pradesh. He seemed to have lived his childhood in Bisrakh and acquired Lanka later. Kubera was the original ruler of Lanka. The Pushpaka Viman, the gold with which the kingdom and all the riches that Lanka had were given originally to Kubera after his penance. Raavana drove him away and seized Lanka which he ruled this his death.

So actually Raavana was born not far from Ayodhya! But yes, he was huger in size due to his asura genes and lifestyle.

Coming to your question of the Vanvas, Raavana was granted a boon from Brahmadev that only a human could kill him. For that Vishnuji took a human avatar who had no ideas about his powers. Also Ramaji had already reached Panchvati in the 13th year of his banishment and they had a year to get back to Ayodhya. Anywhere up North would've taken more time.

So he had to move South to kill Raavana. This was done first by the 14 year banishment from Keikeyi. Then Lord Rama went to Chitrakoot and lived there but they needed to go more Sout to get closer to Lanka. This was triggered when Bharat arrived at Chitrakoot to take back his brother. Lord Rama knew that Bharat could come again to convince him to come back to Ayodhya. Also Chitrakoot had many Rishis doing tapasya and Lord Rama did not want that to be disrupted coz of him. Thus they left Chitrakoot.

Lord Rama and Lakshmana went on killing more and more asuras, daityas and daanavas they came across. These creatures had actually terrorised the Rishis and even killed many. Finally when they reached Panchvati and met Jatayu they chose to stay there for the last year of their Vanvas. The rest of the story is what you already know. 😊

Aanandaa thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: Ashley.Tisdale

THIS IS SUPER LONG BUT WORTH THE READ.

Mercurial Medusa has already stated the imp points, I'll just go a notch deeper to clear this to show the movement of the two clans. And I am doing this coz I love our history 😆

Firstly there is no Aryan-Dravidian. That was all BS served to us by historians and the West ideology for them to appear superior. If anything there has been movement out of Bharat Khanda due to clash of ideologies or separation of population due to tectonic plate movement. This is what I feel because I've read various texts, predominantly Zoroastrian, Nordic etc. I can link each and every thing to India.

We've all originated from Brahmaji, it could be Manu, Prajapati, Manasputra etc. So its all gonna lead back to him.

There were three clans, one of Ikshvaku, one of Nimi and the other of Rishi Pulastya. Lets talk about Ikshvaku first but to understand the details I am gonna talk about his father first..

Shraddhadeva Manu also known as Satyavrata or (commonly) Vaivasvata Manu is the current Manu. Manu is known as the first man and is actually a title given to the ruler. In one DAY or KALPA of Brahmaji, there are 14 Manvantaras. Each is headed by a single Manu. We are currently in the 7th Manvantara. Thus Vaivasvata Manu is the 7th Manu.

Now Vaivasvata Manu's kingdom was situated in the Southern regions of India called the Dravida Kingdom. V.Manu (shortening his name) was warned by Matsya Avatar of Vishnu about the Great Flood. He built a boat which carried his family and the saptarishis (these too change every Manvantara). The Matsya Avatar guided them to the top of the Malaya Mountains. This is said to be in modern day Mangalore. After the Deluge, Manu's family and the seven sages repopulated the Earth. Thats why everyone had 100s of children. Both Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi dynasties came from V.Manu, but I don't want to confuse you right now.

Iskhvaku was one of the 10 sons of V.Manu who founded the Ikshvaku Dynasty. They were known as Suryavanshis since Ikshvaku's grandfather was Surya. Lord Ram belonged to this dynasty. The kingdom was Kosala Kingdom, its capital was Ayodhya. Lord Ram's lineage also called themselves Raghuvanshis after King Raghu, Ramji's great grandfather.

Next is Nimi, son of Ikshvaku. He established and founded the kingdom of Videha, commonly known as Mithila. Raja Janaka belonged to this dynasty. His adopted daughter Sita Maa along with the other three princesses were married off to Lord Rama and his brothers respectively.

Finally we come to Raavana. His father was Vishrava, grandfather was Rishi Pulastya and his great-grandfather was Brahmaji. Vishrava earned his powers through severe tapasya. Saptarishi Bharadwaja even married his daughter Ilavida to Vishrava because he was very impressed. From this union was born Kubera, the king of wealth.

Stories of Vishrava's power spread everywhere. Sumali was one of the founders of Lanka and a Daitya/Asura. He heard these tales and decided to get his daughter Kaikesi married to Vishrava. Her parents orchestrated the entire thing so that Vishrava would fall in love with Kaikesi. From this second marriage came 4 children: Ravana, Vibhishana, Kumbakarna and Shurpanakha. But because of the kids' asura genes they started behaving demonically. Vishrava returned to his first wife shortly after witnessing this.

Raavana was said to have been born in Bisrakh, a village in Uttar Pradesh. He seemed to have lived his childhood in Bisrakh and acquired Lanka later. Kubera was the original ruler of Lanka. The Pushpaka Viman, the gold with which the kingdom and all the riches that Lanka had were given originally to Kubera after his penance. Raavana drove him away and seized Lanka which he ruled this his death.

So actually Raavana was born not far from Ayodhya! But yes, he was huger in size due to his asura genes and lifestyle.

Coming to your question of the Vanvas, Raavana was granted a boon from Brahmadev that only a human could kill him. For that Vishnuji took a human avatar who had no ideas about his powers. Also Ramaji had already reached Panchvati in the 13th year of his banishment and they had a year to get back to Ayodhya. Anywhere up North would've taken more time.

So he had to move South to kill Raavana. This was done first by the 14 year banishment from Keikeyi. Then Lord Rama went to Chitrakoot and lived there but they needed to go more Sout to get closer to Lanka. This was triggered when Bharat arrived at Chitrakoot to take back his brother. Lord Rama knew that Bharat could come again to convince him to come back to Ayodhya. Also Chitrakoot had many Rishis doing tapasya and Lord Rama did not want that to be disrupted coz of him. Thus they left Chitrakoot.

Lord Rama and Lakshmana went on killing more and more asuras, daityas and daanavas they came across. These creatures had actually terrorised the Rishis and even killed many. Finally when they reached Panchvati and met Jatayu they chose to stay there for the last year of their Vanvas. The rest of the story is what you already know. 😊


Very interesting read. I just don’t get why they wanted to create mystery in our history and make it mythology.😵

swaragini1 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#38

THIS UGLY FLOP ACTOR IS STILL GETTING MOVIES

Ashley.Tisdale thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 5 years ago
#39

Originally posted by: Aanandaa


Very interesting read. I just don’t get why they wanted to create mystery in our history and make it mythology.😵

Because colonisation, destruction of pure knowledge and the need for invaders to be superior. These are the same people who said the Earth is flat while Hanuman Chalisa had already stated the distance between the Sun and Earth.

The only monotheists that coexist peacefully are Zoroastrians. Their Avesta has huge links to Rig Veda. I assume they branched out from us over ideological differences but then they made their way back too. And look what great people they are.

Lemme just say this, there is no mythology. Every 'legend' is as real as you and me. But it was lakhs of years ago. So we don't have any dates and, in lots of places, proof. Thanks to the destruction of our Universities. You can see the Rama Setu, remains of Rama Mandir found in Ayodhya during excavation, remains of Dwarka underwater, Swastik and Om stamps in IVC sites...the list is endless.

Yet our textbooks glorifies invaders and the EIC. They even talk about how great Mesopotamians, Sumerians, Greeks and Romans were...without the slightest clue of how closely they were linked to Bharat Khand. Our Vedas and Puranas were never translated because no one wanted us to know the knowledge hub we came from. Lots of truths have been twisted which you only realise after reading.

I just know one thing: I am blessed to be born into Sanatana Dharma. Just reading about it makes me realise what a small part we are of a much bigger (multi)verse. And the corruption done by our own politicians, invaders, liberals and even corrupted Hindus when it comes to varna system etc cannot stop me from following honest Sanatana Dharma. Its beautiful and very fulfilling.

Pr1yanka thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 5 years ago
#40

Originally posted by: MercurialMedusa

He was comical in Tanhaji. He is a good actor but is not consistent.

Over hyped movie maha bakwaas thi

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 2 months ago

Throwback race 1 premiere - Katrina Saif MS Dhoni Sameera https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNlfiV9SmZW/?igsh=enZzZ3Y1cG9qcHF6

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 1 months ago

Saif Ali Khan and Kareena Kapoor Spotify video https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOiLoLUkQXO/?igsh=Y3RsczVwMm41dnd1

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 5 months ago

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/akshay-kumar-and-saif-ali-khan-reunite-onscreen-after-17-years-since-tashan_221597

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 3 months ago

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/saif-ali-khans-rs-15-000-crore-bhopal-inheritance-declared-enemy-property-by-madhya-pradesh-court_224311

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 2 months ago

https://x.com/NetflixIndia/status/1956589238914322722

https://x.com/NetflixIndia/status/1956589238914322722
Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".