Posted:
He has do so many number of films and then only he has only a very few number of hits in his kitty.plus he has no huge fan following and neither the looks or charisma.do you think that he should be called a superstar???
He has do so many number of films and then only he has only a very few number of hits in his kitty.plus he has no huge fan following and neither the looks or charisma.do you think that he should be called a superstar???
28 yrs on Top and 11 100 cr movies . Most after Salman Khan , Akshay has 10
Tanhaji 270 crore , Golmaal series, Singham series and so many other Hits like Dhammal 2, Raid, Son of Sradar, Bol Bachchan, Drishyam, ,2 National awards
Someone would be dumb to say that he is in the top league...
Only people with Strong PR are considered stars
Varun Dhawan's last 4 movies have underperformed or Bombed at box office, still he is the budding superstar due to his PR...
not superstar but a very popular actor.. only Salman Khan and Aamir Khan can be called superstars and 2000-10 SRK
He is a mini super star .His movies usually open in the mid range and their final outcomes pretty much dependent on word of mouth(except Singham ,Golmaal series) .Even Taanhaji had a shaky initial .His movies do not really create a frenzy alone on his name .He is a shade below three Khans ,Akshay and Hrithik .Also his ladies fan following is not big which could have pushed him to next league .
Except that I think Mr.senior B is in a class of his own. He is right when he says-
Baaki sab abhi bache hai unke saamne, as far as the grasp he has on the Indian audience is concerned!
comment:
p_commentcount