India Today Grills Rhea (DT Note pg. 28) - Page 20

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

But you don't have any problems with Arnab's nautanki so why are you bothered about Rajdeep? He's giving Rhea space on the channel for the interview and if he wants to exaggerate and call it a grilling, it's not that big a deal relatively compared to what others do.

Calling someone a mediocre actor is not badmouthing. Sushant fans need to stop expecting everyone to call him a genius and the best actor around. If someone doesn't believe it, they don't have lie just because he's no more. Dead actors' careers are debated all the time. It happens with every actor both before and after his life.

Sushant's sister doesn't seem articulate.

What she meant to say was Rajdeep said something in the line that, "Sushant isn't even that big of a star, so why are people making such a big deal of his death". And that is an utter moronic comment to say about someone who died. If someone thought Sushant was a mediocre actor or average actor, I personally think shouldn't be an issue, but if someone is suggesting that since he wasn't a big name, so his death shouldn't be a big issue, which Rajdeep had said, that is badmouthing. That is disrespecting the death.

Honestly I feel let Rhea give her interview, then it will be digital evidence which can't be refuted or deleted.

We all remember what happened with Ravindra Patil and how his testimony was dismissed as "not wholly reliable". If she later on goes to upgrade or change her statements then it can be used against her.

So bring it on, it will be fun to see her get caught in her own lies.

Originally posted by: Sailor-Moon

It very much is badmouthing imo, if people can't even show decency towards a person who died in such tragic circumstances then it's a very sad state of affairs. He was a young person who is just gone and no one is expecting that everyone should call him a genius but what is the need to say bad stuff about him when his grieving family can see all of it

Calling someone mediocre is not an insult for god's sake. All it means is that he was average - not bad but not great either. Being in a public profession means that everyone will have opinions about your craft. Everyone is not going to think he's a genius. I thought he was outright terrible in Dil Bechara and that Sanjana (who I hate) was a lot better. So? I actually didn't even post about that movie because I knew the Warriors would make a fuss if someone didn't like him in it.

Everyone has family members. Rhea is also someone's child. It must be tearing apart her old parents to see what is being done to her. But you don't care, do you? Similarly, people aren't going to care how "hurt" his family gets if his acting is called average. He was still a successful guy even if some people didn't like his acting so what does it matter? It's the last thing his family should be concerned with.

Watching the interview right now! Rhea is disputing all these rumours. Every single accusation, she has proof to prove otherwise. She is letting out a lot of SSR's family secrets! Thats why the family is not OK with her coming out with this interview.

I have never hated any journalist more than Rajdeep Sardesai.

And Rhea, the less said the better.

Originally posted by: RegressiveThug

Sushant's sister doesn't seem articulate.

What she meant to say was Rajdeep said something in the line that, "Sushant isn't even that big of a star, so why are people making such a big deal of his death". And that is an utter moronic comment to say about someone who died. If someone thought Sushant was a mediocre actor or average actor, I personally think shouldn't be an issue, but if someone is suggesting that since he wasn't a big name, so his death shouldn't be a big issue, which Rajdeep had said, that is badmouthing. That is disrespecting the death.

https://twitter.com/HashTagCricket/status/1292019057831469057

Originally posted by: potterhead14

We do not know what the final revelation of this case will be, it can be anything.

But one thing needs to be addressed

Just the way it is wrong to use slang for rhea or belittle her in different ways (without the final verdict of the case) it is also wrong to call someone mentally unstable whom you did not know.

Here many proofs are being given of his behaviour and even his early life..... thing is none of us were there to see him upfront. Just the way it is being said that only a portion of Rhea's chats are being shown to prove her guilty it cn also be said that only a portion of Sushant's life is known by us to say all this.

I am pretty sure more than us, the people who are only seeing him through a screen, his sister, niece, girlfriend of 7 years, friends would know him better.

So if one is telling others to not make comments on the basis of such incomplete information I think he/she should follow it too.

P. S being depressed is not equal to being "mentally unstable", there is already too many stigmas around it don't make it more tabboo by giving it such defitions.

Some depressed people are extreme workaholic and exercise addicts.

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

Calling someone mediocre is not an insult for god's sake. All it means is that he was average - not bad but not great either. Being in a public profession means that everyone will have opinions about your craft. Everyone is not going to think he's a genius. I thought he was outright terrible in Dil Bechara and that Sanjana (who I hate) was a lot better. So? I actually didn't even post about that movie because I knew the Warriors would make a fuss if someone didn't like him in it.

Everyone has family members. Rhea is also someone's child. It must be tearing apart her old parents to see what is being done to her. But you don't care, do you? Similarly, people aren't going to care how "hurt" his family gets if his acting is called average. He was still a successful guy even if some people didn't like his acting so what does it matter? It's the last thing his family should be concerned with.

Rajdeep said why should his death be investigated ,he was mediocre and not a star ,his sister has problem with that

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

Calling someone mediocre is not an insult for god's sake. All it means is that he was average - not bad but not great either. Being in a public profession means that everyone will have opinions about your craft. Everyone is not going to think he's a genius. I thought he was outright terrible in Dil Bechara and that Sanjana (who I hate) was a lot better. So? I actually didn't even post about that movie because I knew the Warriors would make a fuss if someone didn't like him in it.

Everyone has family members. Rhea is also someone's child. It must be tearing apart her old parents to see what is being done to her. But you don't care, do you? Similarly, people aren't going to care how "hurt" his family gets if his acting is called average. He was still a successful guy even if some people didn't like his acting so what does it matter? It's the last thing his family should be concerned with.

Originally posted by: aaditi123

Why is the sister acting like a fish out of water over an interview? What do you have to hide? Sketchy!

She probably has done something wrong in past.