Oh boy. I don't even know where to begin.
I promised myself that I would not keep watching the show for my own emotional wellbeing, but I watched the most recent episode out of curiosity, because as some of you can tell (it's pretty obvious by my profile picture 😆), I'm a fan of Kaveri's. And I was left with an extremely bitter taste in my mouth, as per usual.
I have probably been labeled a "Kuhu defender" by now in this forum, based on all of the posts that I have made in favor of her, and this post will probably just solidify this tag. But even in this episode, I found Kuhu's feelings justified.
By now, some of you are probably horrified, disgusted, repulsed, nauseated, and the like, and will proceed to come out guns blazing, ready to attack this POV. But here's why I feel this way. Kuhu's excitement and then consequent anger makes complete sense. Even though she personally did not win the award, she sacrificed a lot so that Kunal could earn it. In the past year, she provided him with a ton of emotional support and understanding (despite her own conflicting and hurt feelings), supported his family and helped hold them together (during the Mehul track, during the MishBir breakup track, etc.), and stayed back with the family and took care of everything when he had to go abroad, all while going to bed alone for three months. She's a concrete example of "the woman behind the successful man", and she deserved that recognition, and she was excited to get it. She was also incredibly proud of Kunal's hard work, and she knows that even though Kunal may never say it, he too, appreciates the recognition.
So why is it, that a completely rational POV is taken, manipulated, and spit out in the form of over-the-top dialogues? Here's why: Because the writers know that there are two types of people who watch the show: the first being the type to receive the dialogue as a major form of characterization and accept the supposed narrative at face value, and the second being the type to take the dialogue at face value, and the subtle narrative as the characterization.
Here's what the scene should have looked and sounded like:
Kuhu: "Haan, main gussa hoon. Kunal ne kitni mehnat ki iss award ke liye, aur main bohot excited thi kyunki woh uss mehnat ke liye recognition milne waala tha. Maine bhi bohot kuch sacrifice aur compromise kiya aur iss parivaar ka khayal rakha, taaki woh apne career par focus kar sake. Par meri kismat itni achhi kahan hoti hai? Jo recognition mere aur Kunal ki thi, woh as usual, Mishti aur Abir bro ko mili. And yeh koi nayi baat nahin hai. Bachpan se lekar aaj tak, Mishti has never had to struggle for getting recognition for what she does. Kyun?"
By taking out the OTT BG music, the addition of OTT dialogues to completely invalidate Kuhu's sentiments in the audience's eyes, this POV immediately becomes more digestible. And I didn't even have to take anything away from Kuhu's characterization in doing so.
Now before people go, "Kuhu is evil! She tried to "murder" Mishti over at Janmashtami last year! She tried to hurt Abir with the sleeping pills! She's a scheming, steaming "megalomaniac"!", I want to point out that other characters have done equally shady things, but they weren't coupled with over-the-top dialogues and over-the-top BG music just to spin a completely different story. So it's obvious that the writers simply see Kuhu's character as the scapegoat for drama, as opposed to a well-fleshed out character with realistic feelings and resentment.
I've often wondered why people don't see Kuhu the way I see her: heavily misunderstood. But then I remember, if other characters on the show refuse to see Kuhu's POV, and the one character that does is also conveniently painted as scheming and conniving, what can I expect from the majority of the audience?
I've never been a proponent of painting characters as victims. Which is why I hate that Mishti is constantly being painted as a victim, and Kuhu as the consistent aggressor, when the fact of the matter is that Mishti and Kuhu just come from different places. And I'm definitely not painting Kuhu as a victim in this situation. But I can't ignore the fact that the writers take completely reasonable, relatable, and down-to-earth characterization, and manipulate it to no end (using extremely cheap tactics) so that at the end of the day, the girl that was the most realistic ends up looking like the villain of the story. Why else would the writers keep putting her character in situations where her stance can be 100% justified and validated, but still make her look immature, petty and bratty in front of Mishti? Are these writers completely unable to paint Mishti in a good light without putting down Kuhu and making her look like the antagonist?
Hence, three cheers for the most manipulative, gaslit, weak, and lazy writing I've ever seen!
P.S. I'm not gonna be arguing with anyone on this thread, because quite frankly, I don't want to have to defend this POV, because I've tried it before on here, and it's exhausting. It's my opinion, and it's not gonna change. So please don't take my silence as my inability to reply, or lack of a good answer. Because I can guarantee you that I have enough up my sleeve to discuss this all day.