Sushant Singh Rajput Case Thread #5 - ALL UPDATES/DISCUSSIONS HERE - Page 105

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

Who says Ankita was sharing expenses? There is no news report like that all. All we've heard was that Sushant was paying. And she was his ex so she has no right over his money. They were not even a couple anymore but she was taking his money so she could continue to live in a posh apartment.

Here's the thing: in most couples, both people don't earn the same amount of money. It's not possible for the lesser earner to match the other person's lifestyle unless the higher earner pays for it. If Sushant wanted to travel to Europe for his bucket list, Rhea most likely would not be able to pay for it and especially not for fancy hotels and other hi-fi stuff. If he wanted her to go with him, he would obviously have to pay for it. Do you think Iulia can afford Salman's lifestyle? Obviously not so he would have to pay for her too. You cannot do perfect 50-50 in any relationship. You are partners, not roommates that you can divide expenses in that way.

Plus if Rhea drugged him and controlled his money, how was he giving alimony to Ankita?

Ya'll need to accept that Sushant was an adult and he spent on whoever he wanted to and he made those decisions himself. Whether his gf is a golddigger or not doesn't matter if he willingly wants to spend on her. The same rules apply for both Ankita and Rhea.

Who said ankita was taking money?? SSR was paying EMI not paying to ankita.....and that flat was bought together so most probably owner of the house r both...and when sold they both will get the amount

Rhea drugged him to have control over him...ssr was already a good person and he would have paid anyway but the thing is i dont think he would tolerate rhea's real true color...so she just drugged him so that she doesnt have to include him in what she does...and if she doesnt pay the EMI then it will come out and SSR will be called by company...why would she want SSR to know that she stopped the payment

https://www.instagram.com/p/CD3ISSWJkCT/?igshid=1wggzh8snx6jl

LOVE their equation here😳👏 this is from his birthday party January 2020.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CD3wEZ-h82h/?igshid=ndjb6yht4yxk

Originally posted by: Bekind

LOVE their equation here😳👏 this is from his birthday party January 2020.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CD3wEZ-h82h/?igshid=ndjb6yht4yxk

Sushant's voice was beautiful! ❤️

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

Who says Ankita was sharing expenses? There is no news report like that all. All we've heard was that Sushant was paying. And she was his ex so she has no right over his money. They were not even a couple anymore but she was taking his money so she could continue to live in a posh apartment.

Here's the thing: in most couples, both people don't earn the same amount of money. It's not possible for the lesser earner to match the other person's lifestyle unless the higher earner pays for it. If Sushant wanted to travel to Europe for his bucket list, Rhea most likely would not be able to pay for it and especially not for fancy hotels and other hi-fi stuff. If he wanted her to go with him, he would obviously have to pay for it. Do you think Iulia can afford Salman's lifestyle? Obviously not so he would have to pay for her too. You cannot do perfect 50-50 in any relationship. You are partners, not roommates that you can divide expenses in that way.

Plus if Rhea drugged him and controlled his money, how was he giving alimony to Ankita?

Ya'll need to accept that Sushant was an adult and he spent on whoever he wanted to and he made those decisions himself. Whether his gf is a golddigger or not doesn't matter if he willingly wants to spend on her. The same rules apply for both Ankita and Rhea.

@Bold - Exactly. I am a little surprised at how people seem to think that a gf/wife spending their bf/husband's money is equal to them being a gold digger or is somehow an indication of some criminal intent. Partners spend each others money all the time. Especially, like you said when one is earning way more than the other or if one is the only earning member. There's nothing wrong in it if it was done willingly. Also, a partner spending on their partners family is also not wrong if it is done willingly. Why are these things looked down up on? If SSR willingly spent money on Rhea and her family, then there is nothing wrong with that.

However, the operative word here is "willingly". If Rhea or her family were spending his money without his knowledge or consent or by forging his signatures then that is wrong. Or if they were spending it on illegal activities then that's crime. I guess that is what ED will uncover, if these expenses and transactions were done with SSR's knowledge and consent or not.

Originally posted by: buttercups2020

Okay so Sushant was paying EMI of a shared flat with Ankita.

Yet, entire family finds her worthy enough of their trust and ankita certainly not in a 20+ hours of massive grilling under ED.

Ankita had a massive show as lead for years.. what all hit films did the current one have to share or split the expenses?? Interesting!

Hmm.. kaafi same situation for both damsel and ankita. 😳

The situation is not same ,ppl are trying to distract the main focus

Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case: CBI says no question of transferring the case to Mumbai PoliceByBollywood Hungama News Network

Created: Aug 14, 2020 - 10:29 IST

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), in their final written to the Supreme Court on August 13, said that there is no question of transferring the death case of Sushant Singh Rajput to Mumbai Police as there is no case filed or pending there. This submission goes against Rhea Chakraborty who filed in a plea to transfer the case to Mumbai after Bihar Police had filed an FIR against her. She had stated that she won’t receive a fair trial.

#Sushant Singh Rajput

As per reports, the CBI’s submission also reportedly called statement recording of 56 people by Mumbai Police as "bereft of any legal backing’. They requested the Supreme Court to not make any observation that comes in the way of another probe conducted by Enforcement Directorate (ED).

ED has been conducting a parallel investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 after Sushant’s father KK Singh filed an FIR against Rhea Chakraborty and five others for siphoning off Rs. 15 crores from Sushant.

The Central Bureau Of Investigation (CBI), on August 6, registered an FIR against six people including Sushant Singh Rajput’s girlfriend Rhea Chakraborty. The others named in the FIR are Rhea's brother Showik Chakraborty, father Indrajit Chakraborty, mother Sandhya Chakraborty, Sushant's house manager Samuel Miranda and Shruti Modi. The charges leveled against the six of them are abetment to suicide, criminal conspiracy, theft, cheating, intimidation, wrongful restraint, or confinement, among others.

Sushant Singh Rajput passed away on June 14. He was found hanging at his Bandra apartment.

ALSO READ: ‘Pray that the CBI takes over Sushant Singh Rajput’s case so it's investigated without any political agendas’: Kriti Sanon

Tags : CBI, CBI Inquiry, Depression, Mental Health, Mental Illness, News, Rhea Chakraborty, Supreme Court, Sushant Singh Rajput, Sushant Singh Rajput and Rhea Chakraborty, Sushant Singh Rajput death case

Originally posted by: Bekind

LOVE their equation here😳👏 this is from his birthday party January 2020.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CD3wEZ-h82h/?igshid=ndjb6yht4yxk

So Sushant met his family in January 2020? He was celebrating his birthday with them?😕 He also seems to have been messaging his sisters as shown by the chats his sisters shared.

So then how come they are claiming Rhea cut him off from the family and that he was not in touch with them?. Isin't all this diluting that claim?

Originally posted by: Prernaaaa

The situation is not same ,ppl are trying to distract the main focus

I know. I was being funny.

Sorry , lame attempt.😆

To quote Ishkaran Singh Bhandari @ishkarnBHANDARI

Goonge bhi bolenge aur behere bhi sunenge!