Sushant Singh Rajput Case Thread #5 - ALL UPDATES/DISCUSSIONS HERE - Page 104

Wats this new EMI debate? Watever he spent willingly on anyone be it Ankita or Rhea was his choice. But it seems like Rhea n her family were doing illegal transfers to their accounts without his knowledge and that is wrong!

I wish it was easy to understand that willingly spending on someone is a whole lot different from drugging someone and spending their money while they're asleep.

Sounds easy but so hard to grasp.

Originally posted by: Jay_tapori

if cbi is capable of this then y r ppl demanding cbi ...im just thinking agar cbi se kuch clear nahi hua toh ?

Just a hope. They will investigate better than Mumbai police.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CD3k4S9lbc5/?igshid=10s3reh6asy8p

Okay so Sushant was paying EMI of a shared flat with Ankita.

Yet, entire family finds her worthy enough of their trust and ankita certainly not in a 20+ hours of massive grilling under ED.

Ankita had a massive show as lead for years.. what all hit films did the current one have to share or split the expenses?? Interesting!

Hmm.. kaafi same situation for both damsel and ankita. 😳

Originally posted by: zaroonkashaf

Are people seriously comparing a relationship he shared with Ankita to the one he shared with Rhea! Wow. He was almost in a seven year relationship with Ankita. I'm sure their finances were such that they bought more than just an apartment together. Running a house requires both parties to chip in ie if both are working individuals and independent financially. I'm amazed that a relationship that lasted seven years is being compared to one where the girl was literally spending his money just days after they apparently started dating. The house Rhea was staying in was Sushant's. The house Ankita stayed in was shared by both Ankita and Sushant. So that's one difference.

Another slight difference....just tiny..one was a stable relatonship for the most part, the other abusive from everything that is out there. One was one where his ex is still in touch with his family. The other was such where the ,"eternal" lover is out there trying to malign his family. Not to mention pulling out stunts like posting a bottle from Chhichore and making it seem like that's the only thing you have of his while spending God knows how much of his money. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

It's fun though to read certain point of views here. They never disappoint at least when it comes to the hypocrisy of it all. Till not so long back they were stating how Rhea is a financially independent person and is being called whatever she is being called for no reason at all. Now that there is enough proof out there that not just the girl but her entire family's expenses were being borne by Sushant, we are being told how there is so much in common between that and what Ankita and Sushant shared. I guess the definition of common has changed for people....lol.

I personally welcome these opposing perspectives lest we become an echo chamber. Haan unke thode insults & condescension kam hote toh zyaada behtar hota but koi na.....

I am not shocked that question being asked to Ankita right now as she posted this couple of days ago

https://www.instagram.com/p/CDdV9LHh3yT/?igshid=6qokje1lorso

These powerful ppl are buying evidence. And I am not surprised that they are attacking ankita. They are just trying to distract the investigation from the real purpose.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CD3CAuKnGic/?igshid=1id1otw17tnf5

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

Whether Rhea was a golddigger is not is besides the point if Sushant wanted to spend on her. Couples can decide how their finances will be handled. I'm sure Salman pays for Iulia too. So what?

What reason would Ankita have for taking his money when she was not even with him anymore? The Indian media is trash so maybe it's not accurate but they are saying the apt. was only in Sushant's name. It makes sense for him to keep paying the EMI since the apt would remain his on paper. But then Ankita should be paying him rent. Why would she be staying there for free? Or why not just move out instead of relying on your ex's money?

And if Rhea was drugging him and controlling his money, how was Sushant able to keep paying for Ankita's maintenance?

Personally I think he was an adult and he can spend on whoever he wants - Rhea or Ankita or 50 other girls if he desires. But the same judgement should apply to everyone.

If you just would have simply done the burdensome task of clicking on this article and reading you would have gotten your answer...not one but two flats were bought by Sushant and Ankita, which were registered to them individually...and Sushant was paying EMI for the one that was registered to him...now why he still wanted to pay the EMI and not sell it, they know better and it is not relevant to the case which is filed by the family against Rhea and NOT Ankita!

https://twitter.com/SquareFeatIndia/status/1294101933188247552?s=20