Sushant Singh Rajput Case Thread #5 - ALL UPDATES/DISCUSSIONS HERE - Page 102

Unnecessary discussion on Ankita and SSR's properties. I am sure SSR's suicide wasn't even remotely related to Ankita, like it is to Rhea. Rhea has a pending case against her and has a lot to do to prove herself as innocent. Derailing the discussion or focus to Ankita aint going to help.

I dont know what type of Trap I can call this, not a Honey Trap but distraction trap I guess. Let's not fall for this by writing pages after pages of explanation on SSR Ankita property details.

Is there any update of MP giving the phone to ED ?

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

LOL. She felt comfortable continuing to take his money when they were not even a couple anymore? It was like he was paying her alimony without even being married.

He can spend unnecessary money on an ex but he's not supposed to pay for his current girlfriend? Okay.

Maybe it was SSR who convinced her into that...and thats not alimony at all...they bought the flat as shared amount...so if someone suddenly says i dont want to continue anymore how can the other bear it fully???....they have to sell it...maybe she got convinced that she can keep the flat.

Maybe that property is in name of both...staying or not staying doesnt matter...if it is sold they will get equal amount

Originally posted by: jalalrocks

Question is how does Rhea know about this

Sushant wanted Ankita's soon to be husband to pay for the EMIs now. He was fed up with ankita.

Originally posted by: Twinklingmoon

Agreed. So when if he was paying rhea's bill and for her luxury people shouldn't call her gold digger. He was doing that out of love.

Ankita bought a flat with her fiance as well

Ab purane flat se move out hone k baad wo dono (SSR and wo) ,usko rent pe daalne wale the or sell Karne wale the (equal share) ,no one knows .

Or Madam rhea ko ye bhi digest nhi ho rha ki wo EMI wale paise bhi kha sakti thi

Originally posted by: WexQuasExort

Ofc he was doing that out of love..but that doesnt mean rhea wasnt a gold digger...because she did parties which SSR wasnt included in...she told ssr not to accept films which will not have her as female lead...she herself didnt worth a penny but wanted everything from SSR in comparison...

Whereas ankita was accepting a shared amount of a flat which was bought together.....how can she and rhea be compared here i dont understand

Whether Rhea was a golddigger is not is besides the point if Sushant wanted to spend on her. Couples can decide how their finances will be handled. I'm sure Salman pays for Iulia too. So what?

What reason would Ankita have for taking his money when she was not even with him anymore? The Indian media is trash so maybe it's not accurate but they are saying the apt. was only in Sushant's name. It makes sense for him to keep paying the EMI since the apt would remain his on paper. But then Ankita should be paying him rent. Why would she be staying there for free? Or why not just move out instead of relying on your ex's money?

And if Rhea was drugging him and controlling his money, how was Sushant able to keep paying for Ankita's maintenance?

Personally I think he was an adult and he can spend on whoever he wants - Rhea or Ankita or 50 other girls if he desires. But the same judgement should apply to everyone.

https://twitter.com/ASingh4782/status/1294299411606953984?s=20

Originally posted by: jalalrocks

Question is how does Rhea know about this

She must have been sniffing every penny of Sushant ,begairato and laalchiyo k begairati and lalach ki koi Seema nhi

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

Whether Rhea was a golddigger is not is besides the point if Sushant wanted to spend on her. Couples can decide how their finances will be handled. I'm sure Salman pays for Iulia too. So what?

What reason would Ankita have for taking his money when she was not even with him anymore? The Indian media is trash so maybe it's not accurate but they are saying the apt. was only in Sushant's name. It makes sense for him to keep paying the EMI since the apt would remain his on paper. But then Ankita should be paying him rent. Why would she be staying there for free? Or why not just move out instead of relying on your ex's money?

And if Rhea was drugging him and controlling his money, how was Sushant able to keep paying for Ankita's maintenance?

Personally I think he was an adult and he can spend on whoever he wants - Rhea or Ankita or 50 other girls if he desires. But the same judgement should apply to everyone.

ended the delulus🤣

Originally posted by: prerna4rishav

Unnecessary discussion on Ankita and SSR's properties. I am sure SSR's suicide wasn't even remotely related to Ankita, like it is to Rhea. Rhea has a pending case against her and has a lot to do to prove herself as innocent. Derailing the discussion or focus to Ankita aint going to help.

I dont know what type of Trap I can call this, not a Honey Trap but distraction trap I guess. Let's not fall for this by writing pages after pages of explanation on SSR Ankita property details.

Is there any update of MP giving the phone to ED ?

exactly, it's not like he was supposed to not spend any money at all, it's how Rhea's arrival coincided with the quack diagnoses of illness, medications that affected him badly, isolation from his circle of friends and family and in the backdrop large amounts of money to the tunes of crores being transferred to Rhea and her whole family who splashed out on the money for luxuries and parties.. There are so many red flags here while in his previous relationship he was a hale and hearty guy in control of his life and surrounded by his own people. There is no point in comparing the 2 situations.

Originally posted by: Twinklingmoon

Agreed. So when if he was paying rhea's bill and for her luxury people shouldn't call her gold digger. He was doing that out of love.

Atleast ankita didn't pay his brother's tution fees worth rs 4000 using sushant's money. Itna gira hua koi kaise ho skta h? 4000 nhi kharche gye madam rhea se wo bhi sushant k account se pay kiye. Apne bhai k hotel k bill bhi. Atleast ankita's siblings were not aish karoing on sushant's money.