Are these actresses unlucky for SRK ? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

18

Views

2.3k

Users

18

Likes

28

Frequent Posters

Posted: 5 years ago
#11

lol....if we are going to blame someone...how about SRK ..😆..If these movies were blockbusters I would have given the credit to SRK....so he needs to take the blame as well for the failure...these moves just didn't click with the audience.....its all about connecting with the audience......at times bad moves are a hit and good movies fail....nothing to do with luck.

1158437 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#12

Won't say Unlucky.

They lack chemistry ( many factors can be the reason - age gap, the way their characters were written in the movie, I believe apart from two actors, it's the characters between whom the chemistry is created which lacked in the movies which they did) .

They might be comfortable doing movies together because of good bonding and it's good. Not necessary , that off-screen chemistry also transfigures to On-screen chemistry.

Good for them but as as audience, somehow their chemistry couldn't work .

1123225 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#13

SRK is still choosing scrips which rely on his star persona. It doesn't work for him as opposed to AK and SK because the latter 2 had different appeal. Aamir made generally message-focused movies while SK's appeal was to the LCF in audiences.


SRK, OTOH, started out doing varied roles but got stuck in the romantic hero trope. I suppose success and adulation are addicting, and he seems to have become risk-averse in order not to mess with that success.


Problem now for SRK is the same one faced by every 30+ heroine. Except it came for him at 40+ age. Romance is a young person's genre. Yeah, yeah, older people can romance, too, but reality is audience prefers to watch young people falling in love and making out. Once the flush of youth disappears, audience loses interest.


From recent IVs it appears he does want to make a change, but his choices of scripts suggest he is trying to have his cake and eat it, too. He is trying to apply window-dressing to the same romance genre and make it something more. Instead of a Rahul or Raj falling in love, we're showed a Harry or a Bauua falling in love, except they're now given character quirks masquerading as plot twists. Plus, we got what should've been a Rohit Shetty fun flick that eventually turned into a blatant attempt at using nostalgia to bring fans into cinema halls which basically made the audience roll its collective eye. Yeah, there was a Raees, but again, he was presented as a typical Bollywood hero, not as the character say, as an Anurag Kashyap would have. Not to mention a tired plot.


Re: Anushka and Katrina and Kareena. I don't know if they're bad luck per se. Honestly speaking, i don't see any chemistry with Deepika, either. They're all too young for him, and the awkwardness plainly shows. But who are his choices as long as he continues to want to play the romantic hero? Actresses who would've suited have been more realistic about what they could make the audience buy and have switched to roles with some character depth - Sridevi (before her passing), Madhuri, Juhi, Manisha, Tabu. The only exception was Kajol who, after the debacle of Dilwale, also seems to understand that time cooks everything (from Vyasa, not mesmiley36). Alia, Parineeti, Shraddha, et al. would look way too young. So KKK, KK, and AS are it. DP only occasionally because she seems to be clever enough to understand she also needs to switch to meatier roles (not sure she has the skill to carry such roles off). When DP does choose to play a romantic role, it seems based on a lot of factors which would potentially further her future even if the film fails. Therefore, the 3 who do work with SRK end up working in films with recycled plots which audience has been rejecting.


Perhaps SRK used the last few months to step back and reevaluate things. He needs to look at scripts and the movie as a whole instead of what would help him perpetuate/regain the romantic hero image. A detective movie, a thriller, a political drama, a comedy... where his role takes a backseat to the plot. I mean, the man knew enough about scripts to support a film like Badla. I don't understand why he can't put his image aside and do the same for a movie he might perform in.


________________


Phew. 😆 I've been writing essays lately on IF. But then, SRK is the only one I like in BW as a celeb.

Edited by HearMeRoar - 5 years ago
1017676 thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#14

I


No.

All three are unlucky for one another.

heartbleed thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

SRK is still choosing scrips which rely on his star persona. It doesn't work for him as opposed to AK and SK because the latter 2 had different appeal. Aamir made generally message-focused movies while SK's appeal was to the LCF in audiences.


SRK, OTOH, started out doing varied roles but got stuck in the romantic hero trope. I suppose success and adulation are addicting, and he seems to have become risk-averse in order not to mess with that success.


Problem now for SRK is the same one faced by every 30+ heroine. Except it came for him at 40+ age. Romance is a young person's genre. Yeah, yeah, older people can romance, too, but reality is audience prefers to watch young people falling in love and making out. Once the flush of youth disappears, audience loses interest.


From recent IVs it appears he does want to make a change, but his choices of scripts suggest he is trying to have his cake and eat it, too. He is trying to apply window-dressing to the same romance genre and make it something more. Instead of a Rahul or Raj falling in love, we're showed a Harry or a Bauua falling in love, except they're now given character quirks masquerading as plot twists. Plus, we got what should've been a Rohit Shetty fun flick that eventually turned into a blatant attempt at using nostalgia to bring fans into cinema halls which basically made the audience roll its collective eye. Yeah, there was a Raees, but again, he was presented as a typical Bollywood hero, not as the character say, as an Anurag Kashyap would have. Not to mention a tired plot.


Re: Anushka and Katrina and Kareena. I don't know if they're bad luck per se. Honestly speaking, i don't see any chemistry with Deepika, either. They're all too young for him, and the awkwardness plainly shows. But who are his choices as long as he continues to want to play the romantic hero? Actresses who would've suited have been more realistic about what they could make the audience buy and have switched to roles with some character depth - Sridevi (before her passing), Madhuri, Juhi, Manisha, Tabu. The only exception was Kajol who, after the debacle of Dilwale, also seems to understand that time cooks everything (from Vyasa, not mesmiley36). Alia, Parineeti, Shraddha, et al. would look way too young. So KKK, KK, and AS are it. DP only occasionally because she seems to be clever enough to understand she also needs to switch to meatier roles (not sure she has the skill to carry such roles off). When DP does choose to play a romantic role, it seems based on a lot of factors which would potentially further her future even if the film fails. Therefore, the 3 who do work with SRK end up working in films with recycled plots which audience has been rejecting.


Perhaps SRK used the last few months to step back and reevaluate things. He needs to look at scripts and the movie as a whole instead of what would help him perpetuate/regain the romantic hero image. A detective movie, a thriller, a political drama, a comedy... where his role takes a backseat to the plot. I mean, the man knew enough about scripts to support a film like Badla. I don't understand why he can't put his image aside and do the same for a movie he might perform in.


________________


Phew. 😆 I've been writing essays lately on IF. But then, SRK is the only one I like in BW as a celeb.


He needs to talk to Ayushman, Akshay, Aamir and ask them to help him find a good film.

Midnightsorrow thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 5 years ago
#16

SRK looks like Anushka father in most movies

blUeNoSed thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#17

How about THIS actor is unlucky for the actresses?

Romanoger thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#18

🤢

What's with this unlucky treats on heroines....some days back it was on Kareena now this.

Rosie_Marco thumbnail
5th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#19

Why not the opposite?😡

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: 3was ¡ 3 days ago

I've always been fascinated by scenes where two actresses share the screen there’s something electric about it when it's done right. Think of...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: WhipCreamThong ¡ 6 days ago

So many I can name that qualify for stiff and sleepwalking characteristics: - Queen Aishwarya Rai - Katrina Kaif - Deepika Padukone - Jahnvi...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Sparkle_Soul ¡ 19 days ago

https://x.com/upalakbr999/status/1968903206232064346?s=46

https://x.com/upalakbr999/status/1968903206232064346?s=46
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Amira21 ¡ 1 months ago

Most of the outsiders that made big usually had Godfathers or they came from beauty pageant. Like Juhi, Ash and PC came from beauty pageant and...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Amira21 ¡ 4 months ago

I can only think of Kareena and Katrina that made chemistry with most of the actors that they worked with. Other than them, other actresses were...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".