Kangana just implied that the Khans are foreigners on prime time!! - Page 2

Its an interview on her, about her experiences as an outsider and the challenges she faced and how SSR may have gone through the same.

why can't she talk about her struggles and her battles that she faced in her life as an outsider, why can't she talk about it so people can relate to what others either outsiders or struggling actors go through?

This whole business of she cannot talk about herself is BS, yes she can and she should at every opportunity, at every place, she should talk about her experiences in the industry.

Originally posted by: Sashay01

How is this misinformation? Akshay might be giving up his citizenship NOW (after decades) due to public pressure but the point is, he DID consider his citizenship unimportant enough to give it up for a Western country. Nothing will change that.

He's probably lying anyway. He's already lied a dozen times about his citizenship. First he claimed he is an honorary citizen of Canada and Indians should be proud of him. Canada only has 5 or 6 honorary citizens. 🤣 Then he lied and said he has dual citizenship even though India doesn't allow it. 🤣 Then when he got caught, he said he got Canadian citizenship because his movies were flopping but he hasn't been to Canada in 7 years. 🤣That was another lie as there are pics of him in Canada during that time.

No doubt he is lying again about applying for Indian citizenship. He knows people will take his word and forget about it.

I haven't watched the interview and i dont intend to ..

Going by whats written in the OP , i think TM must have misunderstood what she said .. She was talking about white women and in the same breath if she included Khans , i think she meant how male actors continue to rule for decades and decades whereas female actors are discarded after a short span of time .. Basically - the woman card .. Also , going by her Hindutva craziness , i think she might have also hinted at Muslims ruling the BW industry in a Hindu majority country and that people are fools to worship the khans .. But who knows what goes inside that psycho brain of her's .. We can only guess .. 😆

Originally posted by: yg86

Honestly, actions speak louder for me. Akshay has done immense contribution to charities and supporting education of martyr's childrens etc, PM CARES donation. Indian passport holder khans are nowhere near his league. We have no right to question his patriotism.

I am yet to see the context in which she made such suggestion, however, all Khans are known to have Dawood links and have soft corner for Pakistan.

Actions speak louder than words??? Giving up your Indian citizenship is a pretty loud and emphatic action I would say.

And regarding his so called "charitable" and loudly proclaimed donation during COVID..SRK went ahead and made donations worth 60 crores without making a peep or making any fuss! And yet, here we are still debating their nationalistic loyalties. Talk about actions speaking louder than words!

Also newsflash- everyone who worked in Bollywood through the late 80s and 90s had contact with the mafia- that includes Anil, Jackie and even your precious Akshay along with the usual "khan" suspects.

But I expect only divisive rhetoric from a Kangana fan. Btw why did she release her film Manikarnika in Pakistan? That was a pretty emphatic ACTION for Ms. Nationalist!!

I'm glad she let her true face show in this interview.

Ps- I actually like Akshay as an actor but I'm not going to let this fraudulent human being use Sushant's death for her personal agenda and scoring political brownie points!!

Moreover she did not by any means imply that Khan's are foreigners. All she said that Khan's have been ruling for decades and they control the sets too.

Plz watch video before making assumptions and judgements.

I don't think she implied that at all.

She made many points today that are way too questionable, but this is not one among them.

Originally posted by: ChinChinChooo

I don't think she implied that at all.

She made many points today that are way too questionable, but this is not one among them.

Honestly go watch it again. I agree she was on a crazy, haphazard monologue but she made this comment while talking about the unreliability of the audience. "This is the same audience that has made stars out of foreigners" Names Jackie, Kat and Alia. And then says this is the same audience which has had the Khans rule us for years and years.

What other context could there be? Certainly not a positive one! I think liars and rabble rousers like her need to be called out the first time they try this or they get bolder and bolder with their attacks

Originally posted by: Sashay01

Actions speak louder than words??? Giving up your Indian citizenship is a pretty loud and emphatic action I would say.

And regarding his so called "charitable" and loudly proclaimed donation during COVID..SRK went ahead and made donations worth 60 crores without making a peep or making any fuss! And yet, here we are still debating their nationalistic loyalties. Talk about actions speaking louder than words!

Also newsflash- everyone who worked in Bollywood through the late 80s and 90s had contact with the mafia- that includes Anil, Jackie and even your precious Akshay along with the usual "khan" suspects.

But I expect only divisive rhetoric from a Kangana fan. Btw why did she release her film Manikarnika in Pakistan? That was a pretty emphatic ACTION for Ms. Nationalist!!

I'm glad she let her true face show in this interview.

Ps- I actually like Akshay as an actor but I'm not going to let this fraudulent human being use Sushant's death for her personal agenda and scoring political brownie points!!

you should direct that question to Zee Studios and Kamal Jain the producer, not Kangana in fact even question the distributor.

We already got a whiff of her islamophobia when she defended what her sister said against Muslims during the 2020 Delhi riots

Originally posted by: Sashay01

Honestly go watch it again. I agree she was on a crazy, haphazard monologue but she made this comment while talking about the unreliability of the audience. "This is the same audience that has made stars out of foreigners" Names Jackie, Kat and Alia. And then says this is the same audience which has had the Khans rule us for years and years.

What other context could there be? Certainly not a positive one! I think liars and rabble rousers like her need to be called out the first time they try this or they get bolder and bolder with their attacks

So they are two different things, right?

So, if I were to say that the same audience made Katrina, a white woman and a non-actor, a star, the same audience that made Khans rule for years - would that then imply that Khans are white & non-actors?

Ermm...no. I don't think so.