Mumbai Police writes to Yash Raj re Sushant's contract - Page 4

Originally posted by: Eboza

And what are they looking for? I mean what kind of information do they want to get out of production houses? How they pay someone to write blinds ? Emails send that no one should cast him?

Honestly I wished the police did the same investigation on the whole #metoo movement

It's about the 3 film contract..... Read somewhere that while few their 3 films and are free to sign with other ph, Sushants 3rd film took long or not made at all.... I think Adi wanted him to do befikre which he rejected so Paani was stalled and he wasn't allowed to sign other movies then he rebelled and Adi's ego got hurt.... Kjo sided with adi and they sort off boycotted him....

This I have pieced together from all the articles I read...

Originally posted by: anjs

It's about the 3 film contract..... Read somewhere that while few their 3 films and are free to sign with other ph, Sushants 3rd film took long or not made at all.... I think Adi wanted him to do befikre which he rejected so Paani was stalled and he wasn't allowed to sign other movies then he rebelled and Adi's ego got hurt.... Kjo sided with adi and they sort off boycotted him....

This I have pieced together from all the articles I read...

Wasn't it the other way? Sushant was promised Befikre but then Adi he gave it to Ranveer. I faintly remember Sushant had problems with Ranveer because of this. 

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

Straight to YRF? Damn. You go Mumbai Police! Regardless of the outcome, I hope they investigate every angle possible. Looks like they are slowly but surely doing that. 

This might be why Masand is lying low. Any whiff of his involvement in this saga and police would be on his ass. And then he has to reveal his sources and take names. Really hoping this happens. 

It’ll be near impossible to make a case against anyone at YRF on the basis of a contract though, wouldn’t it? I mean unless they hadn’t paid his dues, or were legally obligated to do films with Sushant within a specific time frame and didn’t, how can they make a case of wrongdoing? Say they had to sign him for 3 more films in the next 3 years according to a contract. They wouldn’t have done anything wrong if they haven’t signed him yet. Plus, he’s dead, so they could easily claim that they had plans to meet with him once the pandemic situation was sorted or whatever. 

As far as Masand goes, can the police compel him to reveal his sources? Isn’t he protected as free press? Because it does set dangerous precedent if the police start rounding up journalists and forcing them to reveal sources. I mean, it may do good in this case, but what about journalists reporting on political corruption? Can the subjects of those articles then not “attempt suicide” or claim other personal harm, or utilize personal ties, and get the police to reveal these sources? 

Originally posted by: KgirlLuvsD3

It’ll be near impossible to make a case against anyone at YRF on the basis of a contract though, wouldn’t it? I mean unless they hadn’t paid his dues, or were legally obligated to do films with Sushant within a specific time frame and didn’t, how can they make a case of wrongdoing? Say they had to sign him for 3 more films in the next 3 years according to a contract. They wouldn’t have done anything wrong if they haven’t signed him yet. Plus, he’s dead, so they could easily claim that they had plans to meet with him once the pandemic situation was sorted or whatever. 

As far as Masand goes, can the police compel him to reveal his sources? Isn’t he protected as free press? Because it does set dangerous precedent if the police start rounding up journalists and forcing them to reveal sources. I mean, it may do good in this case, but what about journalists reporting on political corruption? Can the subjects of those articles then not “attempt suicide” or claim other personal harm, or utilize personal ties, and get the police to reveal these sources? 

Free speech laws don't protect sources, especially if a crime is suspected.

I have my doubts whether they can do anything to YRF, though. Even if something was wrong with it, surely it would be a civil case only Sushant could've filed?

https://twitter.com/sparkleawaylove/status/1273691414656737280?s=21

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

You really need to show some sensitivity instead of coming up with snide sarcastic remarks.

You really love Alia that much that you’re ready for disown humanity ?

😆

pls don't come up with  humanity , respect, doesn't suit you. when things got heated you did not shy away from calling an actress ..bazaar ki. so what i call alia  i love you.

bade aayen humanity , respect dikhlaane...

we all enjoyed blinds here and gave our 100% thrashing each and every actor actresses out there.

how about...lets clean our acts first before going after alia bhatt.

oh and i loved some of  ali bhatt performance, and will continue to watch her movies. i also love and enjoy movies fromothers, be it outsiders, insiders. i do not judge performances based on where they coming from.

aur kuch safaai chahiye?

Oh dang!!! That’s one heck of a power move. Even if nothing comes of it (I really hope sushant gets his Justice), it will scare these BW folks, who are just cowards cuz they all love to hide and play their games. 

and, while they are at it, ask Masand how’s he holding up. Dudes laying real low for someone who was everywhere this few months 

Alia Bhatt is just collateral damage in the process. It’s the fault of people like Kjo. His utter trashy talk show is vile. Even that might not be a problem but the blinds and these so called stars destroying other people’s career are an issue. 

People may blame her for choosing Sushant to ‘kill’ but she didn’t look happy doing it and apologised immediately afterwards because she had to choose someone out of those options. I personal don’t feel she’s a problem here. I don’t think she has enough brain cells to destroy someone.