Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 2 - Page 121

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Swarghoran means journey to swarga , abode to devraj indra, he stays there.

Lord Vishnu , goddess Lakshmi, adi sheshnaag when they left mortal world , they directly go 2 their abode vaikuntha not swarga.

I know what swarghoran means sweetheart. But that is later interpolation as many scholars believe

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Radha & Draupadi r not one , radha is ansh avtar of goddess Mahalakshmi.

There is different story why radha got married to ayan.

There was great devotee of lord Vishnu who was ayan did a very hard penance to please lord Vishnu , when lord Vishnu came & asked him 2 ask 4 a boon , ayan said he wanted 2 have goddess Mahalakshmi as his wife, little does ayan knew he is trying 2 act smart with lord Vishnu .

Lord Vishnu granted him d boon , so in result mahalakshmi ansh avtar took form as radha but ayan was born as transgender , who don't have any relationship with radha.

This story also prove no-one can be husband of mahalakshmi or even her ansh avtar other than lord Vishnu.

Draupadi was from every mean wife of Pandavas, she has five sons from her five husbands.

Mahalakshmi already took birth as Rukmini & radha , other wives of lord krishna , so she will not take birth has Draupadi.

Funnu how radha is not mentioned in most of the ancient text about krishna. Why so ?? May I ask. Did krishna not give her that "HONOUR". Even though drapaudi was very clearly mentioned even though krishna "DID NOT GIVE HER ANY HONOUR"

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Why will laxmi take a birth as rukhmini when she has absolutely no role to play in greater realms things many scholars even believe that satyabhama was probably the only wife lord Krishna had. Since there all lot of inconsistent in their story. Drapaudi played a greater role it is more logical that laxmi will be drapaudi and together with Krishna they play their part to establish dharm

Mahabharat don't consist lifestory of lord krishna nor was it his war. Lord krishna lifestory is in bhagwat & harivansham.

Mahabharat is story of kaurav Pandavas, that's why Rukmini ( mahalakshmi) & balram ( adi shehsnaag) don't have any significant role in Mahabharat

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Why will laxmi take a birth as rukhmini when she has absolutely no role to play in greater realms things many scholars even believe that satyabhama was probably the only wife lord Krishna had. Since there all lot of inconsistent in their story. Drapaudi played a greater role it is more logical that laxmi will be drapaudi and together with Krishna they play their part to establish dharm

She has no role in Mahabharata, Mahabharata is the story of Pandavas, their lives gets more importance than Lord Krishna, we get to know more about Lord Krishna from other Puranas, not from Mahabharata, it doesn't mean Indra is more important than Lord Vishnu

Can you provide text where Krishna and Draupadi are romantically involved or She is stated as Goddess Laxmi?

Why would Goddess Laxmi marry Pandavas?

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Funnu how radha is not mentioned in most of the ancient text about krishna. Why so ?? May I ask. Did krishna not give her that "HONOUR". Even though drapaudi was very clearly mentioned even though krishna "DID NOT GIVE HER ANY HONOUR"

Still he is world famously known as " radhe krishna". Dint u heard that also , he is majorly worshipped with radha everywhere.

Radha will not be mentioned in Mahabharat where she has no role .

Radha will mentioned in harivansham & bhagwat.

I request u 2 plz visit d birth place of lord krishna , Mathur, virndavan etc , u will get 2 know what importance radha hold in lord krishna's life

Ok to the set the record straight this debate started when i say that there is no krishna without krishnaa. What i meant was the only dharma that pandavas had on their side was Drapaudi/krishnaa/panchali. And since krishna was supporting dharm or in other words only form of dharm that is drapaudi so had krishnaa left her good for nothing husbands krishna would have not supported them either. And laxmi was a goddess so if she takes a human form it will be a for greater good why will take form as someone who has no role whatsoever to play to get married to Vishnu???? What kind of logic is that

Plus if you see clearly both drapaudi and krishna echoes exactly the same thought process o don't know what is.

And to whom it may concern Mahabharata was NOT DDLJ or Bollywoodish romcom business going on between any of the couples whether its arjun drapaudi or arjuna subdhara or drapaudi bhim or anybody

When i call krishna and krishnaa soulmates its because they had the same thought process and stood up for what was right and just. If i have to believe in somebody s divinity it will be these two and nobody s elses

Even if we remove the divinity angle i will happily bow down to these to supreme being who above all believed in human s ability to the right thing against all odds

Originally posted by: NoraSM

She has no role in Mahabharata, Mahabharata is the story of Pandavas, their lives gets more importance than Lord Krishna, we get to know more about Lord Krishna from other Puranas, not from Mahabharata, it doesn't mean Indra is more important than Lord Vishnu

Can you provide text where Krishna and Draupadi are romantically involved or She is stated as Goddess Laxmi?

Rukhmini has absolutely no role in any sphere. She is just krishna s wife

Do you reliaze a very simple thing that Mahabharata was not your Bollywoodish romcom when i call them soulmates its because they echoes almost the same thought process its because he was the only one who was most affected by her its because she publicly single him out and certain her authority on him its because she guides him and bares her heart out to him and he in turn makes it very clear she was his reason to fight the world

Its because these two have always put responsibilities and duties and justice over there personal dharma. Its because these two were the only who had it in them to fight the world for what was right

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Ok to the set the record straight this debate started when i say that there is no krishna without krishnaa. What i meant was the only dharma that pandavas had on their side was Drapaudi/krishnaa/panchali. And since krishna was supporting dharm or in other words only form of dharm that is drapaudi so had krishnaa left her good for nothing husbands krishna would have not supported them either. And laxmi was a goddess so if she takes a human form it will be a for greater good why will take form as someone who has no role whatsoever to play to get married to Vishnu???? What kind of logic is that

Plus if you see clearly both drapaudi and krishna echoes exactly the same thought process o don't know what is.

And to whom it may concern Mahabharata was NOT DDLJ or Bollywoodish romcom business going on between any of the couples whether its arjun drapaudi or arjuna subdhara or drapaudi bhim or anybody

When i call krishna and krishnaa soulmates its because they had the same thought process and stood up for what was right and just. If i have to believe in somebody s divinity it will be these two and nobody s elses

Even if we remove the divinity angle i will happily bow down to these to supreme being who above all believed in human s ability to the right thing against all odds

No krishna would had still supported Pandavas , he will never leave arjun alone who was incarnation of sage nar his soulmate . Lord krishna himself had said he love arjun d most in this world.

Balram too had accused lord krishna for supporting Pandavas coz of arjun .

Killing of karn was not only for Draupadi. Karn past life was connected with nar naryan .

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

No krishna would had still supported Pandavas , he will never leave arjun alone who was incarnation of sage nar his soulmate . Lord krishna himself had said he love arjun d most in this world.

Balram too had accused lord krishna for supporting Pandavas coz of arjun .

Killing of karn was not only for Draupadi. Karn past life was connected with nar naryan .

Where did i mentioned karna???????

Krishna makes it very clear what his reason for war was. That sums it up.

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Rukhmini has absolutely no role in any sphere. She is just krishna s wife

Do you reliaze a very simple thing that Mahabharata was not your Bollywoodish romcom when i call them soulmates its because they echoes almost the same thought process its because he was the only one who was most affected by her its because she publicly single him out and certain her authority on him its because she guides him and bares her heart out to him and he in turn makes it very clear she was his reason to fight the world

Its because these two have always put responsibilities and duties and justice over there personal dharma. Its because these two were the only who had it in them to fight the world for what was right

The quote I provided was from Mahabharata, not script of a Bollywood movie so I am aware that Mahabharata is not a Bollywood movie

Krishna and Draupadi being soulmates is your opinion, I am not arguing against it because opinions are not facts, you are entitled to your opinion, I am asking you to give citation where Draupadi is mentioned as Goddess Laxmi so I can consider this as a fact

Even Arjun is being called Krishna's soulmate, doesn't mean he was Goddess Laxmi, I am not saying anything against these beliefs

Krishna also makes it very clear that Arjun means the most to him, yet you say he would have left Pandavas

My wives, my kinsmen, my relatives, non amongst these is dearer to me than Arjuna. O Daruka, I shall not be able to cast my eyes, even for a single moment, on the earth bereft of Arjuna. I tell thee, the earth shall not be reft to Arjuna. Myself vanquishing them all with their steeds and elephants by putting forth my strength for the sake of Arjuna, I will slay them with Karna and Suyodhana

I am not arguing against anyone's opinion on any relationship, I just want to know about Draupadi being Goddess Laxmi