Sonakshi is being trolled for not knowing a basic Ramayana question

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

1116756

Suspended

Posted: 5 years ago

#121

Quote

1116756

Suspended

Posted: 5 years ago

#122

---

------

----

-----

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

guenhwyvar

@guenhwyvar

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 5 years ago

#123

Originally posted by: hasini009
Next question ye puchna tha ‘ramayan mein Luv Kush kaun hain’?
Wo jawab degi mere judwa bhai 😆

Chor na yaar. She wanted to read the Ramayan, but not being good in reading ruined it for her. Bechari bechari.

Quote

Bubble Tea

@FlourishedPeony

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 5 years ago

#124

Maybe she deliberately did all this to remind people that she still exists. Otherwise people don't even bother about her these days 😆.

Edited by Bigbang_SHINee - 5 years ago

Quote

guenhwyvar

@guenhwyvar

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 5 years ago

#125

Originally posted by: tapori
Conservatives (right) and liberals (left) exist everywhere in the world. In India, unfortunately, there is no more place for liberals. They *must* be sent to Pakistan.
By the way, how many who are laughing on Sonakshi would know that there was no idol worship as per the vedas? In fact it was supposedly discouraged. The greatest God that was worshipped was Indra dev, and there is NO mention of Lord Shiva!
And yes, Ramayana IS technically a story. Just like Illiad. I consider vedas as our source of truth. Puranas are just extensions. And Ramayana & Mahabharata are stories retold(Bhagvad Gita is technically a part of Mahabharata). They could be true stories, yes. But shrota, the way information was passed down, would mean some info might have changed.
Fill Disclosure: I am centre left. I'm a practising Hindu who has studied Sanskrit but can also read the Urdu/Arabic script.

Source on idol worship was supposedly discouraged. I don't think it was discouraged, heck I don't even think it was mentioned.

Quote

Zeal17

@Zeal17

Stunner

+ 10

Posted: 5 years ago

#126

Originally posted by: Peek-A-Boo
Maybe she deliberately did all this to remind people that she still exists. Otherwise people don't even to bother about her these days 😆.

Now everyone remembers her, family members, Ghar ka naam articles might be even writing something like on work front her next movie name and that is releasing on this date ..etc etc.

Quote

Bubble Tea

@FlourishedPeony

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 5 years ago

#127

Originally posted by: Zeal17
Now everyone remembers her, family members, Ghar ka naam articles might be even writing something like on work front her next movie name and that is releasing on this date ..etc etc.

She now has 6 months of guaranteed publicity from this 😆. Now we have to see if she puts this publicity to better use 😆.

Quote

Golimumab

@Golimumab

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 5 years ago

#128

Originally posted by: tapori
My dear friend, please read my comment again. Upanishads are the essence "derived" from the vedas. So vedas are the source material for upanishads. The name 'vedanta' explains it all.
Vedas do NOT contain idol worship. Is this line true or not??
Go to any museum and see the age of any idol. You'll be surprised at what you see!

You first decide if you want to argue based on scriptural evidence or historical evidence. Because you were pretty sure in your previous comment about what Vedas say about idol worship. And now you are talking about age of idols.And if you feel Vedas and Upanishads contradict each other then nothing more to say. You have right to believe what you want to. But make sure you don't hurt others sentiments. I feel your comment was unnecessary in a thread about Sonakshi's poor GK.