Is ananya pandey actually Annie Peter? - Page 11

Originally posted by: Tinaa11

It wasnt that unglamorous back in the days as it is now?

See again you're saying hindu surnames are unglamorous after saying Hinduism in uncool.😆

And no, I am not speculating based on nothing...

See me saying Pandey is uncool has a personal story as we had a family of Pandeys in our locality, who are biggest misers and aag lagau aunties and uncles around. So whenever I see a Pandey, I think they are same.

Hindusim is cool, from all the religions, I find it cool, because Hinduism is the only religion which recognized atheism, doesn't restrict the way of worshiping, doesn't restrict which god to worship. Dekha jaye toh sab hi Hindu hai, including Muslims and Christians, since Hinduism allows monotheism. Plus any religion which has a Shiva, has to be the coolest religion ever.

I said Ananya might have found keeping Jesus pic cool since it is western , as many Indians do. Which you mistook for me calling Hinduism uncool.

Originally posted by: Tinaa11

And I have also countered you on all that..The readers and stalkers can go back a few pages and check for themselves. I am not repeating myself here now.

your counters are also speculation based on my speculation. So speculation countering speculation, leads to more speculations. So all we are doing is speculations.

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

See me saying Pandey is uncool has a personal story as we had a family of Pandeys in our locality, who are biggest misers and aag lagau aunties and uncles around. So whenever I see a Pandey, I think they are same.

Hindusim is cool, from all the religions, I find it cool, because Hinduism is the only religion which recognized atheism, doesn't restrict the way of worshiping, doesn't restrict which god to worship. Dekha jaye toh sab hi Hindu hai, including Muslims and Christians, since Hinduism allows monotheism. Plus any religion which has a Shiva, has to be the coolest religion ever.

I said Ananya might have found keeping Jesus pic cool since it is western , as many Indians do. Which you mistook for me calling Hinduism uncool.

Well what are we discussing here? Ananya, right? If she thinks having jesus in her room makes her look cool then we can for sure say she is uncool with hindu gods. And if its uncool to be seen as hindu as per her own thinking process, then it's not too far fetched that she and her entire family is into jesus. Does it sound that unbelievable?

Afterall we have kamal hassan for an example who kept it hidden from public all his life. So why is it difficult for people to accept that pandeys are not pandeys, but actually peters inside the walls?

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

your counters are also speculation based on my speculation. So speculation countering speculation, leads to more speculations. So all we are doing is speculations.

I haven't pulled out that image out off my youknow where 😆

So, no...everything i say is not speculation but what u are saying to counter me is.

Originally posted by: Tinaa11

Well what are we discussing here? Ananya, right? If she thinks having jesus in her room makes her look cool then we can for sure say she is uncool with hindu gods. And if its uncool to be seen as hindu as per her own thinking process, then it's not too far fetched that she and her entire family is into jesus. Does it sound that unbelievable?

Afterall we have kamal hassan for an example who kept it hidden from public all his life. So why is it difficult for people to accept that pandeys are not pandeys, but actually peters inside the walls?

word is "if". If she thinks, Jesus is cool, that is speculations. That also leads many speculations, prominents ones being (a) she does not think Hindus are cool, (b) She thinks Jesus is cool, but doesn't mean Hindu gods are uncool.

So I am giving 100% certainty to both, since none of us have any proof.

See it is not difficult for people to accept Pandeys being Paul/Peter/anything, but people want proof, and you only have speculations to give them. Unless you find a convincing proof, you are fighting a loosing battle, and no one will believe you, even if you are right. Galileo Galilei was condemned and banned by religious people, who used to be considered logical at that time. So another possibility is that you are the Galileo Galilei of our forum, and we all are fools to not see the truth, which you can see. But another possibility is that you are Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier of our forum who was mistaken that planet Vulcan existed.

See it is all speculations and possibilities by you, me or anyone in this thread.

Originally posted by: Tinaa11

I haven't pulled out that image out off my youknow where 😆

So, no...everything i say is not speculation but what u are saying to counter me is.

photo of Jesus is not a proof, it is also a speculation generating medium for you or anyone. Just like Khans celebrating Hindu festivals, make some Muslims in religion forums and fb pages think that Khans are Hindus pretending to be Muslim.

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

word is "if". If she thinks, Jesus is cool, that is speculations. That also leads many speculations, prominents ones being (a) she does not think Hindus are cool, (b) She thinks Jesus is cool, but doesn't mean Hindu gods are uncool.

So I am giving 100% certainty to both, since none of us have any proof.

See it is not difficult for people to accept Pandeys being Paul/Peter/anything, but people want proof, and you only have speculations to give them. Unless you find a convincing proof, you are fighting a loosing battle, and no one will believe you, even if you are right. Galileo Galilei was condemned and banned by religious people, who used to be considered logical at that time. So another possibility is that you are the Galileo Galilei of our forum, and we all are fools to not see the truth, which you can see. But another possibility is that you are Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier of our forum who was mistaken that planet Vulcan existed.

See it is all speculations and possibilities by you, me or anyone in this thread.

Tumhare speculations wale post ko Maine already counter kar diya.

Now in this comment which you quoted what i said is not based on speculations. The photo of jesus is there in her room. So it's obvious that she either believes in jesus or she thinks it makes her look cool. That's her thought process which is pretty clear. The rest is all soecualtuons.

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

photo of Jesus is not a proof, it is also a speculation generating medium for you or anyone. Just like Khans celebrating Hindu festivals, make some Muslims in religion forums and fb pages think that Khans are Hindus pretending to be Muslim.

Bollywood mein show off hota rehte hai because secular facade continue hi rakhna hota hai warna movies kaise chalegi. Par here We are discussing what happens behind four walls...tts very rare that we get glimpse from their bedrooms..😆

Originally posted by: Tinaa11

Tumhare speculations wale post ko Maine already counter kar diya.

Now in this comment which you quoted what i said is not based on speculations. The photo of jesus is there in her room. So it's obvious that she either believes in jesus or she thinks it makes her look cool. That's her thought process which is pretty clear. The rest is all soecualtuons.

You debunked it by saying they might be. You are using the words might and so on, so you yourselves aren't here with full proof. It is like using fingerprints to declare someone guilty, which isn't accepted by the court, unless you proof it by giving more concrete evidences. Which you are currently lacking.

Also there is also a possibility of it being gifted to her. Which you are debunking with a her being gold digger, which is itself a speculation based on the opinion of a person who was bullied by her in school. And people who get bullied, tend to be weak, lying and exaggerating bitter people.

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

You debunked it by saying they might be. You are using the words might and so on, so you yourselves aren't here with full proof. It is like using fingerprints to declare someone guilty, which isn't accepted by the court, unless you proof it by giving more concrete evidences. Which you are currently lacking.

Also there is also a possibility of it being gifted to her. Which you are debunking with a her being gold digger, which is itself a speculation based on the opinion of a person who was bullied by her in school. And people who get bullied, tend to be weak, lying and exaggerating bitter people.

As I said, I have counterd you on all those points and I am ot going to repeat myself here.

I think there is nothing left between us to discuss regarding this subject. No point stretching it beyond a point.