Did Manikarnika 'cure' her husband?

Page

Next Last

TheBoss

@TheBoss

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

Is it me who found it highly stupid that this movie showed the husband (Gangadhar Rao) who was presumably gay based on historical evidence suddenly turn into straight?

W*F? 😕

Edited by TheBoss - 6 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

709927

Hibernated

Posted: 6 years ago

Utha le re baba...when was he gay... 😳

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Deadinside

@Deadinside

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

🤣
Is it? The way you described it though.

Quote

1103978

Hibernated

Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Fortuitous
Utha le re baba...when was he gay... 😳

Wearing a "bangle" apparently makes one "gay" ... 😆😆😆

Quote

1103978

Hibernated

Posted: 6 years ago

Simmba done! ...Manikarnika done! .. Next trolling material will be "Gully Boy" ... 🤣

Quote

slumgod..

@slumgod..

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 6 years ago

Haven't watched the movie but it could be cinematic liberty.

Quote

pallavi25

@pallavi25

Inactive

+ 5

Posted: 6 years ago

The King wore bangles not because he was gay but he felt emasculated by the British East India Company lording over his rule so that Raja didnt even have authority over his own kingdom. The bangles were a self mockery how ineffective and useless he felt as a ruler.

And yeah just because the King loved arts and culture and books didnt mean he was gay either, then many great rulers of the past who were patrons of art and culture would be gay too.

Quote

Alyx

@mystic786

Dazzler

Posted: 6 years ago

What? Her husband was not gay 😕😕

Quote

TheBoss

@TheBoss

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: pallavi25

The King wore bangles not because he was gay but he felt emasculated by the British East India Company lording over his rule so that Raja didnt even have authority over his own kingdom. The bangles were a self mockery how ineffective and useless he felt as a ruler.
And yeah just because the King loved arts and culture and books didnt mean he was gay either, then many great rulers of the past who were patrons of art and culture would be gay too.

There's a some written history about Gangadhar Rao that he was gay. I have no doubt it touched on this subject in the movie too.

http://www.prisonersofeternity.co.uk/the-rani-of-jhansi-2/

https://www.copsey-family.org/~allenc/lakshmibai/early.html

https://www.ukessays.com/essays/history/rani-lakshmibai-warrior-queen-a-historical-profile-history-essay.php

Quote

tina

@tina59

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 6 years ago

#10

The kind Gangadhar was known to be more interested in creative arts and wore a bangle to remind himself of how powerless he felt with the British taking over Jhansi.

It also highlights he had an effeminate streak in him but that does not make him Gay