Why is it okay for Jhansi ki Rani to dance and not okay for Rani Padma

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

CherHorowitz

@TotalBetty

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#31

Women didn't dance in public in those days except courtesans

So any depictions of Upper class women dancing in public with commoners is totally inaccurate

SLB showed Paro dancing together with a courtesan. I don't think that was in the original Devdas

Edited by BettyA1 - 7 years ago

Quote

OG Evil Spawn

@Maroonporsche

Achiever

+ 11

Posted: 7 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: BettyA1

Women didn't dance in public in those days except courtesans

How do you thats how it was ??? Where you there 😆😆😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Shaitaan Haiwan

@Shaitan-Haiwan

Stunner

+ 8

Posted: 7 years ago

#33

Its just a movie, cinematic liberties must be taken in order to enjoy the experience.

You seem to have no problem with PK being an alien or Sanjay Dutt being a victim In Sanju. Like those things, just accept it.

If you want authenticity then read history books ?

Quote

Justwatching

@Justwatching

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#34

Miss kangu claimed that they had three historians come and authenticate their movie.

But the disclaimer of the movie says the movie doesn't hold ANY accuracy at all

Quote

OG Evil Spawn

@Maroonporsche

Achiever

+ 11

Posted: 7 years ago

#35

Originally posted by: Justwatching
Miss kangu claimed that they had three historians come and authenticate their movie.

But the disclaimer of the movie says the movie doesn't hold ANY accuracy at all

Another lie

What allergy does she have to telling the truth 😆

Quote

1098676

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#36

Problem with Padmaavat was that Rani Padmini is considered a goddess by Rajasthanis, Rani Lakshmi Bai is not. Christians will not like if Jesus is shown dancing in a movie.

Quote

576281

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#37

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Then why did you begin arguing with me abt the queens dancing when I just put forward MY POV. You know very well who Im referring to and which movie...creative liberty wasnt considered then. You are defending Khilji dance as creative liberty then it shd apply to every movie and whatever weird illogical things they show, right?

@Black:I am not the one defending anyone, you were the one who defended Kangana's dance in Manikarnika as fitting the narrative of a progressive queen...I said none of these can be defended because they all are out of place except when you ignore them as creative liberty! I have no idea how you twisted it into me defending Khilji...You were the one who went about contradicting yourself a couple of times...

@Blue: No just say it...I really don't know what you are talking about... When a movie appeals to me, I am not the one measuring each and everything and searching for logic...In fact I think you were also there in that topic where I was made fun of for seeing logic in a movie like OSO...Yes that's me! I don't like/dislike a movie because of these silly things...May be I have my own way of watching and enjoying movies...But how can you question that?😕

Also, don't keep on using the words like 'hatred', 'bashing' etc so loosely...at least not with me...Because I hope you notice how I never cross any line expressing my dislike for be it the actors or their craft or their movies...I may dislike them/their craft/movies but none of them are important enough for me to have such strong feelings like 'hatred'...

Edited by cricketfan1 - 7 years ago