3 STATES Banned Padmavati - 25% Business already Down

Page

Next Last

Romeo Ustra

@Sultan.Mirza

Achiever

+ 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 8 years ago

1. Rajasthan

2. Madhya Pradhesh

3. Punjab

All 3 combine provide around 25% of Film's Business. Next in line may be:

4. Haryana - HIGH End Multiplexes in Gurgaon & Noida

5. Uttar Pradesh - Biggest Single Screens chain

Film has gained enormous HYPE, but not RELEASING the film is like Biggest Task.

Show the film to those few ppl, may be 10-15, End this controversy, else if banned in these states, Padmavati gets a release, it won't recover 50% of it's business.

Edited by .Omkara. - 8 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

All bans will be lifted after Gujarat election.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Romeo Ustra

@Sultan.Mirza

Achiever

+ 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: ponymo
All bans will be lifted after Gujarat election.

It should have banned in Gujarat only, if election is the reason.

Quote

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: .Omkara.

It should have banned in Gujarat only, if election is the reason.

That will be too extreme, and the result may go in favour of Congress if it backfires. So no one is going to experiment over Gujarat. By banning in other states and ensuring postponement of release, they have ensured it won't release in Gujarat.

Quote

zara321

@zara321

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 8 years ago

Deepveer dreamy scene was not promoted, it was a rumour that started in Dec last year, in Feb the team bought out a official statement that there is no scene like that at all, so for months the team clarified there is no such scene, Wat us happening now is all political, coz if the gujrati elections cbfc is not certifying the movie. So the producers took the decision to deferr it,

And these fringe groups r complaining about everything to do with the film, they r objecting to ghoomar, they object to the way padmavati is dressed, they object the fact that khilji is even in this movie, I mean they do not want this film to be shown

Quote

Romeo Ustra

@Sultan.Mirza

Achiever

+ 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 8 years ago

Forget dream sequence, it's objection will be off if makers SHOW the film to this group. Why is SLB/VIACOM sitting quiet now also, showing film to media & not to the ppl who creating problem for release?

Just show the film to 10 main ppl who control all these groups & just let them decide, if after showing they still create problem, then SLB/Team can go big in SC.

Quote

Kya hai ye

@DobbyDeol

Stunner

+ 8

Posted: 8 years ago

Headline mein "3 States" padh ke pehle mujhe laga 2 states ka sequel aa gaya...😆

Quote

Romeo Ustra

@Sultan.Mirza

Achiever

+ 5

Sarcastic Chatterbox

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: butthurtmod37

how can cbfc certify without watching movie, slb sent blank paper without cd and expected cbfc to certify them. exam mein pass honey key liye kuch likhna padta hai even for grace marks. Gujarat election is one sided match, bjp will win easily,

There is a 7A section in form, which is to be filled as "FICTION" or "REAL STORY", that was left blank by Viacom team when they sent papers to CBFC.

CBFC can't certify without that, even in film that disclaimer was missing.

Quote

Not gonna tell

@sherlockthor

Inactive

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

Why SLB always creates controversial films?

Its very risky

Quote

Her-mion-e

@Her-mion-e

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: .Omkara.
Forget dream sequence, it's objection will be off if makers SHOW the film to this group. Why is SLB/VIACOM sitting quiet now also, showing film to media & not to the ppl who creating problem for release?

Just show the film to 10 main ppl who control all these groups & just let them decide, if after showing they still create problem, then SLB/Team can go big in SC.

See just like the land of the law states that any film first needs to be approved by one and only CBFC before public screening there is no law in the constitution which states a particular movie has to be approved by a certain group of people under any situation. So the demand of screening to fringe group is itself unconstitutional while SC has already said they are not gonna interfere in CBFC matter neither it will ban the movie.

Personally I think if its ensure a smooth release then show it to ex Royal's representatives..But it will be a bad precedence to showcase the film to a group of thugs who talks in butcher's language.