What will you do? (context- Padmavati) - Page 19

Originally posted by: -Cool-KeshuVS-

The most trusted historian of India James tod has clearly mentioned Padmini in his 'aaine-akbari'... and even rajasthan's biggest historian /poet of 16th century Muhnot nainsi has mentioned it...even the 'Rajprashasti' built in 16th century in Mewad had the full hitory of thier ancestors, they wrote it to preserve the facts... and many more many more historians have presented their thesis works related to it IF jaisi sites per me aur jyada batana bhi nahi chahta because its too cheap to explain here... all historians are much more authentic then the ones who rejected it... if the story wasn't real then jaysi ki poem me allauddin aur ratan singh ke bhi nam nahi hote


and later Archeological department got sufficient evidences of johar near vijay stambh of chittorgarh fort... and then it was declared as johar sthali...


aur bhi proofs chahiye to jao chittod, visit their royal libraries and museum, read the reports and thesis and get all the facts right on your faces...


IF per bolna bohat asan hai


idhar udhar ki farzi sites pe padh liya bus not real... aur links post karke bolna suru hogaye

Originally posted by: -Cool-KeshuVS-

The most trusted historian of India James tod has clearly mentioned Padmini in his 'aaine-akbari'... and even rajasthan's biggest historian /poet of 16th century Muhnot nainsi has mentioned it...even the 'Rajprashasti' built in 16th century in Mewad had the full hitory of thier ancestors, they wrote it to preserve the facts... and many more many more historians have presented their thesis works related to it IF jaisi sites per me aur jyada batana bhi nahi chahta because its too cheap to explain here... all historians are much more authentic then the ones who rejected it... if the story wasn't real then jaysi ki poem me allauddin aur ratan singh ke bhi nam nahi hote


and later Archeological department got sufficient evidences of johar near vijay stambh of chittorgarh fort... and then it was declared as johar sthali...


aur bhi proofs chahiye to jao chittod, visit their royal libraries and museum, read the reports and thesis and get all the facts right on your faces...


IF per bolna bohat asan hai


idhar udhar ki farzi sites pe padh liya bus not real... aur links post karke bolna suru hogaye

Originally posted by: NathuPyare

hey thanks for this post mate ...even I googled aine-akbari (a well known text) and Padmini after reading ur post and found this interesting article 😳 -

https://swarajyamag.com/ideas/rani-padmini-putting-the-record-straight

so even on google search ample evidence or arguments can be found about existence of Padmavati...but i guess people who have pre-decided and already formed their notions about padmavati being non-real will conveniently ignore those arguments and proofs. its like people see what they want to see 😳

Originally posted by: NathuPyare

on one side SLB says lots of historical research has been done before making this movie...if padmini didn't exist then why is he fooling people by presenting Padmavati as some great historical rajput princess? either go with facts or go with fiction... if facts and evidence suggests that there was no Padmavati in real then SLB shouldn't even have presented padmavati as some real historical princess...but if he is going by the rajput beliefs of their real great rani then wouldn't it make sense to adhere to their beliefs throughout the whole movie, instead of making a khichdi of facts & fiction. For ex. - If I didn't believe Elvis ever existed then why would i make a movie presenting elvis as some real great person and then further go on to show him singing a ghazal... wouldn't I enrage those people whose actually believe elvis to be real, their idol and a legend of rock & roll?[/quote]

You are asking me what SLB believes in? I'm afraid I can't read his mind, I can only speculate, he might actually believe the story to be true, or he might just be fascinated with the story and presenting it as historical to placate those who believe it's true, I don't know, I can't say one way or the other.

No-one is singing a ghazal in the movie, 2ndly no historical movie in the world has ever been 100% authentic, it's impossible.

You've got your analogy wrong, the belief that the sun is a deity and has a chariot, comes from religious faith/traditions, the fact that sun is not a deity and there's no chariot floating around in space, comes from science. Science has been a deathbed for religious beliefs, not least of which is Adam and Eve.

You know what happened to Galileo when he claimed the Earth revolved around the Sun? he was imprisoned, it was considered blasphemous by the Church, he hurt a lot of people's beliefs, so did Charles Darwin, now their theories are taught in our schools and colleges. 😆

SLB is not answerable to these goons, if they want to watch the movie, buy a ticket and watch it. 😆 They act like they own the story of Padmini, they don't.

You've got people putting bounties and open declarations to cut people's heads/noses off, and people are upset that they've been compared to Taliban? 😆 They have the same religious fanatical mindset as the Taliban, the slightest offence to their religious/casteist sentiments, and they want to kill you, decapitate your head off, they share the same mentality, the only difference is that these idiots are not in power, thank f**k for that, otherwise to what extent would these guys go to quench their bloodthirst?

Deepika didn't disrespect the whole nation, her comments need to be understood within the context of this movie. The way people have been behaving violently against the people involved in this movie, is embarrassing and shameful, and the reason why it keeps happening is because as a society we tolerate this kind of behaviour, as long as they're on "our" side. Whatever disagreements you have could be resolved through debates, discussions etc, no, they want to resort to violence and threats, and silence you at any cost. It happens every time, but the controversy surrounding this is unprecedented.

SLB is not responsible for the actions of these thugs, these gangs act like this because they choose to, so why are you blaming SLB for their criminal behaviour? the blame lies entirely upon them.

Edited by Heisenberg17. - 8 years ago

Originally posted by: -Cool-KeshuVS-

The most trusted historian of India James tod has clearly mentioned Padmini in his 'aaine-akbari'... and even rajasthan's biggest historian /poet of 16th century Muhnot nainsi has mentioned it...even the 'Rajprashasti' built in 16th century in Mewad had the full hitory of thier ancestors, they wrote it to preserve the facts... and many more many more historians have presented their thesis works related to it IF jaisi sites per me aur jyada batana bhi nahi chahta because its too cheap to explain here... all historians are much more authentic then the ones who rejected it... if the story wasn't real then jaysi ki poem me allauddin aur ratan singh ke bhi nam nahi hote


and later Archeological department got sufficient evidences of johar near vijay stambh of chittorgarh fort... and then it was declared as johar sthali...


aur bhi proofs chahiye to jao chittod, visit their royal libraries and museum, read the reports and thesis and get all the facts right on your faces...


IF per bolna bohat asan hai


idhar udhar ki farzi sites pe padh liya bus not real... aur links post karke bolna suru hogaye