'No Means No' : Duggu and Kangana versions

Page

ImagineMe

@ImagineMe

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

So Duggu in his one IV talked about "No Means No". Gave me a sense of dejavu. 😆

I remember Kangana talking about this a year ago at a summit (Sep 21 2016).

Now pay attention to what she says about the "legal" case, feminism, No Means No, Pink, Support.

Watch from 12:35 to 25:20.

Her answers are still relevant today and consistent with her stance and approach on this matter since Day 1.

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZuXAWuTnLQ[/YOUTUBE]

Moral of the Story: They both loved PINK!! 🤡

Edited by ImagineMe - 8 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

Pehchaan.Kaun

@Pehchaan.Kaun

Sparkler

Posted: 8 years ago

Will catch the interview later, but in their case, even if for a minute, I believe it was some ONS, it was YES means YES from both sides, consensual sex. And when later HR said NO (for any xyz reason) KR be like 'NO MEANS YES' 😆 !

And ever since then, it's programmed that way in her head.

BM for the video, but her talking about feminism annoys me like anything now. 🤔

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Resident_Evil

@Resident_Evil

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

Apparently for Kangana, silence and lack a reply mean yes and permission to aggressively stalk a person. 🤢

Quote

Illyrion

@Illyrion

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

I make no pretense of believing anything that comes out of her mouth. But if I did - she has repeatedly said he told her he would never leave his wife or publicly acknowledge her, that she was not fooled (even by the engagement which she thought was "shady") and knowingly entered into a clandestine affair never to be made public. How can she justify what she has done to him since then EVEN if her version were not a blatant self serving lie?

Quote

ImagineMe

@ImagineMe

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: Nova19
I make no pretense of believing anything that comes out of her mouth. But if I did - she has repeatedly said he told her he would never leave his wife or publicly acknowledge her, that she was not fooled (even by the engagement which she thought was "shady") and knowingly entered into a clandestine affair never to be made public. How can she justify what she has done to him since then EVEN if her version were not a blatant self serving lie?

March + April + May 2016 - Witch Hunt Project

Quote

Mehr-k

@Mehr-k

Inactive

Posted: 8 years ago

Even with all these chaos between kangu and duggu the chemistry they shared in the song from movie krrish is praiseworthy😉 very melodious . wish peace between them . Amen

Quote

Illyrion

@Illyrion

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: ImagineMe

March + April + May 2016 - Witch Hunt Project

In every version of Kangana's story I have heard her tell, she unilaterally decided to make public an affair she had agreed to keep private. Witch hunt project was largely conducted by her (actual) exes AFTER that.

Quote

Stargazing72

@Stargazing72

Inactive

Posted: 8 years ago

That is what irritates me too. Via her version the relationship was agreed upon to be private. Then why did she throw it into the public domain. Wasn't she part of that agreement or was that the imposter?

If that happened to a woman wouldn't it be "s**t shaming " .