The Step-by-Step Downfall of A Superstar

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

xROBINx

@xROBINx

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#91

So whats the excuse for this one?? was this Niche movie or not??

Quote

Talcum

@Talcum

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#92

Originally posted by: TeAmo_Messi

EXACTLY.. Dilwale was a bad film and SRK did that bad film because he thought Rohit and kajol can rake in 300 crs.

Hrithik's fans liked Bang Bang, you can go to the reviews if you want. Hrithik was continuously doing intense films and then he did Bang Bang which was a romantic-comedy and his fans loved it. Krrish3 is for kids and a major section of HR fanbase are kids due to krrish, Mohenjodaro was again not a bad film, I know the reviews were dismal but industry was against HR due to kangna issue which happened at that time, but i did not see any Hriithik fan complaining about Mohenjodaro and even many SRK fans gave good reviews in this forum and in twitter also. after watching Mohenjodaro.

Hrithik's performance is considered as one of the best acting performances of this year, and if you think I am over praising it then I have nothing to say that can convince you.

Again you are comparing Fan and Raees with Kaabil but what I am trying to say is that its a downward curve for SRK even if you think Fan was good since his latets JHMS got poor reviews, whereas it is upward curve for HR from Mohenjodaro since his latest Kaabil fetched him excellent reviews.

I will repeat again if you think SRK and Hrithik's poor run can be compared to justify SRK's bad films then Hrithik will come as superior, Hrithik has never got solo release since 2013, his films do not appeal to mass audience, he has negative buzz around him due to kangna, he does not do films with directors like Imtiaz or Rohit, he is ten times less powerful as a star than SRK, he does not even have popular actresses in his films who can bring audience, so if you think you can compare Kaabil with JHMS then go on, I am sure at the end of the year its Kaabil which will still make a place as a good film and JHMS will only be an embarrassment.

Lastly Raees was a potboiler, it had hit elements written on it but it still was NOT a hit. Fan flopped with a solo release, JHMS will flop as a solo release whereas Hrithik flopped only with Mohenjodaro, among his last 5 releases only Mohenjodaro flopped whereas Bang Bang was a semi hit with clash, Krrish was a blockbuster, Kaabil is below average. Now you do the math .. And none of Hrithik's films were Yash Raj banner or had his iconic co-actress with him

When did I compare SRK with Hrithik? I again ask you to read my comments. You started comparing SRK with Hrihik when I asked Nikki if Hrithik should retire. I am not justifying anything about SRK...stop writing anything just for the sake of argument. You started saying that Hrithik is in a better position than SRK ...to which I replied that it is not so. Where is the justification in this? And if you want to compare, then ok...let's do it. Krish 3 and CE released in 2013 ...CE collected more than Krish 3 . Bang bang and HNY released in 2014...HNY collected more. MD and Fan released in 2016, Fan collected more. Kasbil and Raees released this year...Raees collected more. And Hrithik has done two movies under YRF banner...Dhoom 2 and mujhse dosti karogi. It's not just yrf films that succeed at BO. Films of other production houses succeed too. So what's the point of bringing yrf here?And what is the point of comparing Hrithik and SRK? You started this comparison. Nikki and I were discussing about the retirement of Khans. There was no BO comparison going on.

Edited by Arya_Stark - 8 years ago