The Step-by-Step Downfall of A Superstar - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

98

Views

12.2k

Users

44

Likes

178

Frequent Posters

PAcino thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#61

Originally posted by: hotchic

So do I respect your utter dedication towards my posts. Your sudden appearance out of nowhere as soon as my one critical comment against SRK is highly amusing.




An inflated sense of self importance? Wonder where from?
TheRowdiest thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 8 years ago
#62

Originally posted by: .Omkara.

Srk is facing competition from

1. Salman

2. Aamir

3. Young Stars

4. Regional Cinema

JHMS failing will put a big dent on his 3rd spot... if TEPK works, Akki is in Top 3 😆


Billa's flop star list

1. Salman
3. Shahrukh
4 Hritik

🤓
hotchic thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
#63

Originally posted by: PAcino

An inflated sense of self importance? Wonder where from?

You are the one and only source unfortunately. Don't blame me.
Rekha_ji thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#64

Originally posted by: .Omkara.

For the outsiders, Hindi film industry aka Bollywood used to be known by the name of Shah Rukh Khan. Later, with the resurrection of Aamir and Salman Khan in the last one decade or so, Bollywood has started being called as the 'industry of Khan Trio'. Sadly for SRK and his fans, it may soon be called 'Khan Duo' as his fame and stardom is depreciating from film after film.


Its hard for even movie buffs to tell the last true hit of SRK. Its Chennai Express, which released way back in 2013. In the last four years, SRK had 5 prime releases - Happy New Year, Dilwale, Fan, Raees and the latest, 'Jab Harry Met Sejal'. None of these films could justify his global stardom and ended up as huge disappointments for trade, fans and also the actor himself. Going by the early reviews and word of mouth, SRK's today release 'Jab Harry Met Sejal' may end up as one of his biggest failures.

On the other hand, in the recent few years, Aamir and Salman have emerged as box office rulers. With films like Dangal, PK, 3 Idiots etc. Aamir has become the brand ambassador of content-rich films which also strike gold at box office. Salman has emerged as the darling of buyers and masses as he consistently scored box office hits despite criticism related to content.

Talking about future, Aamir has an interesting magnum opus, 'Thugs of Hindostan' and Salman has a potential action blockbuster 'Tiger Zinda Hai' in pipeline. SRK on the other hand has an experimental film titled 'Dwarf', where he is playing a dwarf.

SRK urgently needs to introspect his strategy and choice of films as his stardom is fading with each new release whereas his competitors, the young crop of actors and Southern magnum opuses are on the rise.
Source Link: http://m.gulte.com/movienews/60130/The-Step-by-Step-Downfall-of-A-Superstar


LOL @ the odd usage of "Magnum Opus". Not once, but twice 😆
The "writer" mocks SRK for having his last "true" hit "WAY BACK IN 2013" yet cites a 2009 Aamir release in the very next paragraph. 🥱
Salman is praised for scoring whilst delivering poor "content" yet SRK is told to "introspect his strategy" (W*F does this mean?) for trying something "experimental".
This article is a joke. 🤢
1119479 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#65

Originally posted by: Arya_Stark


In every profession of the world, people retire only at the age when they can't perform at all . The Khans are performing better than the youngsters so why would they retire?



No not in every profession! Do u see Tendulkar still playing!? No!
Talcum thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#66

Originally posted by: Niks77



No not in every profession! Do u see Tendulkar still playing!? No!


I wrote that people retire when they can't perform anymore.Tendulkar too retired when he couldn't perform.
JackSparrowcraz thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#67

Originally posted by: hotchic

I agree here. It's baffling when he is hailed as one of the best which he is not. Lol, I remember someone even had put him a higher pedestal than Brando and Alpacino.😆
For most of the career he has only hammed in his movies which is then considered "natural acting". The only movie he actually acted were Darr, Chak De, Swades, Raees.
Rest are flukes. His charm worked and he got lucky.
Also Salman is a really decent actor, at least doesn't over act and less off-putting than SRK on screen.

bold:What on earth?Please tell me you are lying.Or tell me who even thought that?Brando would roll over in his grave if he ever comes across comparison with a pathetic actor like SRK.And for AlPacino that would be his worst reviewed act.
1119479 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#68

Originally posted by: Arya_Stark


I wrote that people retire when they can't perform anymore.Tendulkar too retired when he couldn't perform.



Who said Sachin couldn't perform!? And that too at all! Who is to say SRK can perform!? Every movie of his gets thrashed! If bringing the audience to the cinemas is performing then even Sachin can bring people to the stadium!
Edited by Niks77 - 8 years ago
Talcum thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#69

Originally posted by: Niks77



Who said Sachin couldn't perform!? And that too at all! Who is to say SRK can perform!? Every movie of his gets thrashed! If bringing the audience to the cinemas is performing then even Sachin can bring people to the stadium!


You are comparing acting with sports! Cricket is not a show business where the money collected from the audience counts. In cricket the performance of the players count. In BW the collection of movies count. The two things that you have compared have no connection at all! The actors will keep on doing movies till they are able to earn from them. The logics you use make me laugh sometimes.
1119479 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#70

Originally posted by: Arya_Stark


You are comparing acting with sports! Cricket is not a show business where the money collected from the audience counts. In cricket the performance of the players count. In BW the collection of movies count. The two things that you have compared have no connection at all! The actors will keep on doing movies till they are able to earn from them. The logics you use make me laugh sometimes.



U urself said every profession so the joke is on u! Then I gave an example of cricket and how that is different! I believe the khans should retire because they look pathetic romancing and running around trees! Bad performance! I don't care if they bring people in or not! My opinion!

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: beena_jon

2 months ago

Vijay Mallya Podcast: Rise & Downfall Of Kingfisher Airlines

Vijay Mallya Podcast: Rise Downfall Of Kingfisher Airlines, Loans RCB | FO364 Raj Shamani - YouTube

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Sultan.Mirza

3 months ago

Perks of being 4th Biggest Superstar for Ajay Devgn

Discussion is about box office earnings, not talent. We all know he's one of the finest actors. Being the 4th biggest superstar, does Ajay have...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: priya185

6 months ago

Ranbir’s niece Samara plays ugly step sister in Cinderella play

Ranbir’s niece Samara plays ugly step sister in Cinderella play https://www.instagram.com/reel/DGPffX4zVpm/?igsh=c2p6YWkzbHA4d21u

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".