Are they gone?

Originally posted by: sammy17

Why is simran turning negative? I didn't watch the show before the leap, but simran was shown dead and is apparently alive, but why would she turn negative?

Originally posted by: maher31

Well many things are not matching up with what we were told at the time of leap. The reason Simran would turn negative would be because just like Raj, she will think that Preet is responsible for Raman's death. I am actually surprised it's been 5 months since the leap and there is no investigation on Raman's death yet. How long will it take Mohini to get exposed? Getting to the change of Sakshi's character, I seriously think there is no need to get a different actress for that role. Rather they can clear out the misunderstanding Raj has over Preet.

Originally posted by: SB24

Pahujas should have some role. Though in positive way. Preet needs an alternate breathing space from the suffocating Bajwa House.

Originally posted by: Ash.raje17

Exactly. The Panchayat has forbidden her to keep any contact with the Pawanias but Gunjan is not a Pawania anymore. She is a Pahuja. So Preet can talk with her. Why can't Gunjan become the link between Preet and Amba?

Why are they showing Amba and Preet suffering on their own. They are each other's strength. If Amba was in contact with Preet then maybe Preet might remember her original revenge plan. Gunjan could do that and that would be in context with the show's original theme of gender equality. Aman could help and support Gunjan in that. They could, for once, show a healthy jija sali relationship between Aman and Preet. And message will be a girl need not cut off all ties with her parents house post marriage. She is still as much a daughter as she is a daughter in law. Aman's unconditional support might actually bring the show back on track.