Originally posted by: sam589
All this is completely fair in theory, I just have few points to make
1. I personally have lost all respect towards BB as an authority. Although ideal, it is no more the case that BB thinks Om is eligible for captaincy, but more like the creative team thinks that making om captain will bring in a lot of filthy content. They let Om fight for captaincy and look what he did. This is no more the show where we can assume that BB is a neutral authority. Another example. The HMs did the bidding task after Om was evicted. Then they later gave Om a chance to win immunity, because he didn't get to participate in the bidding task. well guess what, om was already given a chance by being brought back after eviction and then another week by not being in nomination. This way even priyanka should get a chance. All the wild cards should get a chance? I would think that as a neutral authoritative figure, BB will be a matter of fact, no nonsense, non-emotional guy. What was this "you did not get a chance" ? Well he didnot get a chance because he was friggin evicted!
2. About Manu. both times it has come down to whether he will perform the task for baba against people he really doesn't like. Manu being smart has naturally found a way to justify supporting baba.
So while as a rule I support the idea of keeping task above personal grudges, on case by case basis, in this case i do not support Manu favoring Baba.
3. In BB as a game, the only rule is survive to win. Your krama is to win. To win you can apply sam dam dand bhed. To win you will bring forward the people that would support you in captaincy, nominations etc and try to eliminate people that will nominate you, not support you and so on. The foundation of BB is personal relationships.. politics.. groups. Suppose there was a task where Lopa was supposed to do the task to make Bani get immunity. Do you think Lopa should do it, knowing it is against her bigger game of eliminating Bani? Either way, it is fun to see how people react to such situations. We cannot formulate it like no matter who it is going to benefit, you just do the task. It is against human nature of unpredictability, of taking decisions looking at the specific situations. So Manu would support Baba as his representative is right. But Rohan saying I wouldn't play a task as Baba's representative is also right. There would be people supporting both sides which is the fun part.
4. Tasks. Remember you have to "perform" in tasks. Losing the tasks is usually a problem because then you could lose immunity etc. But if you lose the task for someone else, depending on who it is, you could stand to gain or lose in long term. There have been many winners who have lost many many tasks. You win because of entertainment. content. A story. Popularity. You don't win due to morality: of deciding not to represent baba. You also don't win due to sincerity: of deciding to put task before a person.