Posted:
Originally posted by: abshcool
people saying BR or NAAGIN is regressive may not be the likers of the genre
its just execution u see
Harry potter can't be compared with Indian fantasy series. just think can they?
no
and regarding the acceptance of Indian fantasies the main issue is the execution
Lets just take our show's example
even BR has lost that thrill & excitement because of kekta ji🥱
the show has been monotonous for weeks
sautan drama
turning mil the vamp
overused concepts🥱🥱🥱
this the reason many ppl don't watch them
PS- i love the show
talking in general about what ppl think
No, I'm not trying to compare both, because both have different audience, resource, finance and infrastructure. But can we deny that both fall under somewhat same category, Harry Potter a fantasy thriller and BR a supernatural show.
The show has its own shortcomings, we rant , we criticize and we do make fun of. And it does lack in execution.
What I am trying to put across is that I chose to watch BR knowing very well that it's a supernatural show. But if somebody calls me regressive just because I chose to watch a supernatural show is not acceptable. I'm not pinpointing anybody. Just look at the comments when the trps are out. People rant, they say trps are ruled by nagin, dayan and rakshas, it shows how regressive Indian audience. These are the comments I come across and that's what irks me. Hope you understand.
comment:
p_commentcount