Why Bollywood Can't Handle Real Actors ?

S_H_Y thumbnail
Screen Detective Participant Thumbnail 13th Anniversary Thumbnail + 9

Z-Gen Zest

Posted: 8 years ago
#1

uring a recent TV interview with the inimitable Naseeruddin Shah on his latest release Waiting, the interviewer sought the veteran thespian's views on the new, exciting brand of cinema hitting the screens and more importantly, the gallery of acting talent " Irfan Khan, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Randeep Hooda, Manoj Bajpai, Swara Bhaskar, Kalki Koechlin, Richa Chadda, Radhika Apte, among others " lighting up the scene.

Shah, wry, bemused smile in place, conceded that there were indeed some splendid films on view in recent times " Masaan, Manjhi, Titli, Aligarh, Neel Battey Sannata " and undoubtedly some exceptionally gifted actors, but his concern lay elsewhere. Was mainstream Bollywood interested or capable of recognizing, fostering, nurturing and promoting this talent pool so that they find their place in the sun? Did they have the vision, understanding or qualifications to embrace it enthusiastically and take it to the next level?

Naseer seemed skeptical, arguing that B-town had a weak track record in this area, but mischievously adding that miracles can and do happen, so who knows, these guys could get lucky!

To Bollywood loyalists, Naseer is the industry's favourite bete noir, but fact is that the guy has always called a spade a shovel and fearlessly unleashed uncomfortable, inconvenient and controversial home-truths. Come to think of it, his statement, both loaded and provocative, raises some basic questions: Why is it that none of the acknowledged actors have ever made the cut to the big time? Why is Bollywood so completely clueless when dealing with real actors and so totally comfortable and confident tangoing with stars? Is it intimidation or the inability to slot and pitch them effectively to mass audiences? Are actors perceived as strange, unknown creatures from another planet whose approach, attitude, mindset and technique are on a collision course with the tunnel-viewed Bollywood honchos? Are these actors viewed as a bunch of raw, gritty, non-glam, realism-driven performers worthy of high praise for their cathartic, soul-strip emoting, but hopelessly out of place in Bollywood's loud, glamorous, escapist, star-driven entertainment-specific packages?

Actor Adil Hussain (Life of Pi, English Vinglish, Lootera) has no illusions: "I'll straight cut to the chase. I am not sure Bollywood has either the intent or calibre in terms of background and qualifications to recognize, understand, appreciate and take forward real acting talent. They are quite comfortable in their cocoon, dealing with starry posturing, which goes for great acting in their book. If they were really serious or concerned, would the likes of yesteryears powerhouse talents like Naseer, Om Puri Pankaj Kapoor or today's Irfan, Nawaz, Manoj, Kay Kay, Konkona, Kalki, Ranveer Shorey, Vinay Pathak, Radhika Apte, Richa Chadda and others be languishing in the shadows? What a tragic case of neglecting, ignoring and squandering a wealth of opportunity!"

Apurva Asrani, who has scripted gems like Shahid, Citylights and Aligarh and just completed his latest Kangana Ranaut starrer to be directed by Hansal Mehta, says the Indian obsession with idol-worship has extended to paying divine homage to our stars: "They define our cinema and totally dominate popular imagination. In this scheme of things, the poor actor hardly stands a chance. They will be relevant and accepted only when content-driven films come center-stage, but as of now, stardom and star power is so overwhelmingly seductive that the other cinema is forced to be (and remain) 34th from left! As always, there is a lot of lip-service and tokenism about the importance of writers and need to invest in good scripts, but truth is the star is God. Until the day writers are given their due worth, in terms of respect, status and fees and allowed the freedom to create characters that are unique and fascinating, providing actors new skies to fly and giving audiences a whole new viewing experience, as in the West, the actor will continue to be endangered species, more admired than hired!"

Script writer Juhi Chaturvedi (Vicky Donor, Madras Caf, Piku) believes that Bollywood is a well-oiled machine and the big banners see no reason to take panga with the template, tilt at windmills or muck around with its main focus on entertainment to score brownie points. "It's like going to office to do a job of work, pick up the monthly cheque and keep going. No need to harbour artistic aspirations or out-of-the-box ideas ... avoid the unknown and chill in your secure comfort zone."

Chaturvedi concurs with Naseer's sentiments: "Naseer saab's concern and apprehension is totally legit. You see, the likes of Irfan, Nawaz, Manoj, Kay Kay, Konkona, Shahana, Radhika Apte, Richa Chadda and their ilk are thinking actors who like to be involved and collaborate ... like to ask questions and demand a clear picture of character motivation, trajectory, etc. This is bad news for the mainstream filmmaker nowhere near the same page, and used to total approval from stars (after the agreed upon compromises have been effected) without any form of debate or discussion. Also, the serious actors approach and technique could completely blow the typical masala-director away, because it rides on solid training and background."

So, everything considered, Naseer's fears have a basis. Bollywood, for all the hoo-haa about brave new cinema, is more about dazzling stars, hi-decibel dialogue-baazi, exotic locales, spectacular designer threads, sizzling choreography, mesmerising audience-friendly music, etc.

Remember Bollywood's favorite mantra ... Jo dikta hai, woh bikta hai (that which can be seen is what sells).

Created

Last reply

Replies

7

Views

616

Users

7

Likes

3

Frequent Posters

Maraka_Musso89 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#2
If he's not happy ; then he should start producing period
I'm sure his outlook will change then
Angel-likeDevil thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#3
Pata nahi.. feels like people like fantasy, 'masala' more than reality.. There's nothing wrong liking fantasy, but some realistic ones tend to go unnoticed or rather, unappreciated. Both should be appreciated if they have quality - but the definition of it(quality) varies. Anyway, there are lots of people that like realistic ones too... all types of people liking movies to suit their tastes so, I see no 'big' issue nowadays.


Didn't read the post btw, too long :p
643898 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#4
Even in HW - The rock , Vin diesel etc are bigger stars
1013440 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#5
Ek perception ye bhi hai ki real actors ki film hogi to serious film hogi... matlab entertainment kam hoga... agar real actors ke saath entertaining films bane why wouldn't people watch?
par apne yaha comedy genre ka satyanash hua pada hai... sab overacting hi karte hai... except one or two ...

@ Shy - your dp ... i miss Penny Dreadful so much 😒
princessunara thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 8 years ago
#6
Lol seems Sonam actually got it right by applying the opposite of her logic! Anyone who looks good and commercially viable automatically becomes a bad actor!!
I don't disagree that there indeed r a few who r there only based on their looks and would have disappeared in a flash had they not looked the way they do. But there r quite a few who actually can act and have touched the dizzy heights of stardom

Also this guy is so bitter and it comes across in all the jibes he throws!
Anyway bottom line is before blaming BW why not see what the audience would pay to see. BW is a business and there beauty sells, of course along with a decent story.
643898 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#7
No one is given stardom on a platter . They had to earn it
blue-ice. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#8
because BW produces what the audience wants...and audience says Looks>>>>>> talent toh wahi sahi...and by audience I don't mean the 50 odd members of this forum jo talent talent kehte hain...I mean the real wali audience...I know that humare forum members ke liye Talent> looks😉😆

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue

an hour ago

Bollywood: Time for some nostalgia

There’s something magical about how Bollywood has stayed with us through the years — from the dreamy charm of Pehla Nasha to the iconic train...

Expand â–¼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue

1 months ago

Best Bollywood song of 2025 so far!!!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSJa1UytM8w It's beautiful!!!! Loving it!!! Ahaan Pandey looks promising too!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSJa1UytM8w
Expand â–¼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue

17 days ago

Mrunal Thakur — A True Gem Bollywood Keeps Sleeping On 🌸

Mrunal Thakur is honestly one of the most underrated actresses working today. She has the beauty of an old-school heroine — expressive eyes, a...

Expand â–¼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: JackSparrowcraz

11 days ago

Which actors/actress will get affected due to Ahaan and Aneet

The new stars on the block will give competition to the existing lot.Which actors or actress will get affected due to Saiyaara's success?

Expand â–¼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue

9 days ago

2001: The Year Bollywood Music Peaked?

If there's ever been a single year that can lay claim to being a golden era of Bollywood music in itself, it might just be 2001 . It wasn’t just...

Expand â–¼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".