one reason i felt why urmila was so rude!

AbhiAni thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#1

i always had a good opinion about the judges from the beginning, but i was really a surprised with urmila's behavior. I was just thinking how could she do this to parchi??? i guess during one occasion, prachi said" me isse kum kapde nahi pehansakti something like that......may be urmila felt a slap 😳on her face...so it is tit for tat????😉 what u guys think???

Edited by naga_mani - 17 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

2.1k

Users

13

Frequent Posters

rupaliforever thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#2
I think everyone is reading too much into Urmila's comments. It should be clear by now, after all these weeks of watching Jhalak, and even she specified this fact before stating her opinion that she is opinionated and not everyone believes she's well-spoken or something along those lines. She stated her opinion just like everyone else on this forum has been doing. I mean she is human after all, though she was a judge, but come on, if she was displeased she had the right to say what she wanted like we do here. 😊
Mistyy thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: rupaliforever

I think everyone is reading too much into Urmila's comments. It should be clear by now, after all these weeks of watching Jhalak, and even she specified this fact before stating her opinion that she is opinionated and not everyone believes she's well-spoken or something along those lines. She stated her opinion just like everyone else on this forum has been doing. I mean she is human after all, though she was a judge, but come on, if she was displeased she had the right to say what she wanted like we do here. 😊

exactly..people can't even let her have freedom of speech😡

AbhiAni thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#4
Oh really dear... i did not know freedom of speech means whatever comes to your mind, you can speak out... thanks for enlightening me...no hard feelings 😃
smitra110 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#5
Well Urmila should not have occupied the judges chair if she wanted to indulge her urge for 'freedom of speech'. As a judge on a telly reality show she is meant to be neutral till the cameras stop rolling and the telecast stops. That is what she was appointed for.
Somali
ReemAnshu thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#6
Staying Neutral does not mean that they do not share what they feel about contestants. She and Shiamak said what even many of us feel, this is democracy and no one is gagging you from speaking. Infact she being the judge it is more important for her to voice her opinion, she is no dummy judge and nor is Shiamak.
teenbeauty thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#7
ok u ppl say that urmila has freedon of speech etc... but if sandhya won.....and urmila said the same thing to prachi that prachi will always b her winner and stuff then answer this honestly would u have liked it?

what urmila said was really rude and i felt that she completely spoiled prachis moment.
i think prachi deserves an aplaud for keeping a smiling face even after the comment.
Being a judge urmila shd not comment like this.


didnt mean to offend ne1.sorry if i did.


nim.
yipee thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#8
i think she said it more to console sandhya..in the sense to make her feel gud she voiced her opinion..it didnt seem rude to me 😕
maddy786 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#9
I dont wear less clothes!!
that was the best moment of the show!!!!

and after all the rude behaviour/comments specially by Urmila, Im still glad that the 19yr old turned out to be the more SENSIBLE one! who simply IGNORED everything and celebrated her victory on her own!...

and im PRETTY SURE we wont see Urmila in JDJ 3 (if it takes place)...
Mistyy thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: smitra110

Well Urmila should not have occupied the judges chair if she wanted to indulge her urge for 'freedom of speech'. As a judge on a telly reality show she is meant to be neutral till the cameras stop rolling and the telecast stops. That is what she was appointed for.
Somali

judges are there, so that they can use their own intellegents and experience of the field to give their honest opinion. They are not there so that they can pamper everyone. Who said that judges are not suppose to give their opinion?? How is she not being neutral.., she would be being biased if she had supported Sandhya for her own personal relatioships or reasons, but she supported Sandhya caz for her she was a better dancer.

Actually, it was Jeetendra who was clearly being biased toward Prachi in finale..so plz look at the whole situation before making any remarks😕

Edited by piya_y116 - 17 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".