one reason i felt why urmila was so rude! - Page 2

Urmila was neutral. She said she thought Sandhya was the winner AFTER Prachi had been voted the winner. She would have not been neutral if she had said it before. Shiamak was the one who was not neutral as pointed out by Negi.

Prachi should never have won. She only came back as a wild card entry. There was no reason to have the wild card -- there were no rules about when the wild card would be administered, to how many etc. This was unfair and changes rules mid-game should not be allowed, especially when the stakes are high (i.e. money).

Do the choreographers get any prize money or just the stars?

I laugh when I read all these comments about "neutrality" of judges. Judges are there precisely to provide opinions. Unlike Jeetendra, who coudl say nothing but positive things about every contestant, Urmila and Shaimak provided criticism and pointed out technical faults.

Ofcourse they were disappointed that Sandy didn't win because to them, she had clearly proved (by her performances) that she was the best dancer. Remember they were also upset when other deserving candidates lost (including Prachi when she was previously eliminated). So people, give the judges their due. They have every right to NOT agree with the voting public.

i thought Urmilla was a judge and judges are suppose to remain unbiased, atleast on screen 😕

Originally posted by: teenbeauty

ok u ppl say that urmila has freedon of speech etc... but if sandhya won.....and urmila said the same thing to prachi that prachi will always b her winner and stuff then answer this honestly would u have liked it?

what urmila said was really rude and i felt that she completely spoiled prachis moment.
i think prachi deserves an aplaud for keeping a smiling face even after the comment.
Being a judge urmila shd not comment like this.


didnt mean to offend ne1.sorry if i did.


nim.

Very well said👏...i totally agree with u.