Priyanka- Deepika's RIVALRY goes a notch higher - Page 7

Originally posted by: ViccoTurmeric

You dislike PC after reading this article😆

Kyu joothe bolte ho sahab... Bolo do - Na pasand PC tohare ko

no i liked her in bm..
more than dp..
bt if this article has one iota of truth then
i cnt help disliking her..
what is the use of name fame money if u envy someone?
if u envy someone means u feel u have still to achieve what
ur opponent has achieved..then ur conceding defeat..
so the more jealousy she shows towards dp means she herself
feels she is loosing..
n i dislike this..ur winner as long as u have no one to envy..
as u know then ur doing great..u dnt need the world to certify it..

Originally posted by: yamyam

Of course I believe in PRs too and I do think that PRs send out certain articles.. But I do not believe that every article is sent out by a PR.. PRs are professionals.. you really think they would send an article like this one which basically defies what DP herself said earlier?😆

Yes I would! Of course there are general articles too, but mostly when one actor is favored over another it is PR! Not showing off or anything but I'm working in that field so I know 😆 in the PR/marketing field I mean, not with celebs lol before anybody starts calling me liar & stuff. Every kind of publicity is good publicity, the PR agencies don't themselves write the articles, they give money & the brief to the news or online sites, it is the writers on these sites which wove an article around the brief given to them. The PR agencies, though professionals don't go back to check the facts since they handle so much. They know the common public doesn't know anything about PR articles & stuff so since it is p
Out there, their job is done.

BTW @ my bold statement - just got proved by JustMySelf's comment! 😆

Disclaimer : when I say the above, I do acknowledge that there can be exceptions! Sometimes PR agencies do give readymade articles. But mostly in the case of renowned newspapers (in this case it is Mumbai Mirror(Times) ) they insist the writing be done by them.

This PR agency got great timing

Originally posted by: JustMySelf

no i liked her in bm..
more than dp..
bt if this article has one iota of truth then
i cnt help disliking her..
what is the use of name fame money if u envy someone?
if u envy someone means u feel u have still to achieve what
ur opponent has achieved..then ur conceding defeat..
so the more jealousy she shows towards dp means she herself
feels she is loosing..
n i dislike this..ur winner as long as u have no one to envy..
as u know then ur doing great..u dnt need the world to certify it..

What Vedant meant was- if you started disliking because of the article then it is wrong cause the article is proved false in this very thread. PC signed up with her new PR agency way before DP announced her film! Secondly PC didn't back out of the perfomance, she was ready it was DP & this was confirmed by both DP & PC. So if the facts/ reasons given in the article are wrong how can PC be proved insecure?

Originally posted by: JustMySelf

no i liked her in bm..
more than dp..
bt if this article has one iota of truth then
i cnt help disliking her..
what is the use of name fame money if u envy someone?
if u envy someone means u feel u have still to achieve what
ur opponent has achieved..then ur conceding defeat..
so the more jealousy she shows towards dp means she herself
feels she is loosing..
n i dislike this..ur winner as long as u have no one to envy..
as u know then ur doing great..u dnt need the world to certify it..

Originally posted by: Patronus

What Vedant meant was- if you started disliking because of the article then it is wrong cause the article is proved false in this very thread. PC signed up with her new PR agency way before DP announced her film! Secondly PC didn't back out of the perfomance, she was ready it was DP & this was confirmed by both DP & PC. So if the facts/ reasons given in the article are wrong how can PC be proved insecure?

i see..
bt i dnt have any reason to dislike pc..
i really liked her in bm n felt sad for her more than
mastani..
n as for pr things i really do nt know these prs..
dnt understand their functioning either..
they seem to do more damage to the stars than any good..
n as here we react on first hand news/statements that are
posted i merely commented on that..now it often happens in name of
pr some says something..n then comes a clarification no no we did nt mean this
etc etc so every time there is a statement followed by denials as if a circus..
as a commoner its difficult to know ho is being truthful who is the vindictive
n who is vindicated..
now if i am to wait for verifications for every article then i must remain
tight lipped forever..
as i cnt do so as i am as much a common person who would love to
jump the fence n join the discussion so i guess i could end up supporting
the wrong person as well unknown to me..so i mentioned if this article has
any iota of truth then i dnt like her..if nt then i have no reason
to dislike her..hai na?

ooo rivalry went a notch higher,call films fbi n save d poor world lol. whose pr it is if they ve hand in dis popcorn wwe article lol