Created

Last reply

Replies

35

Views

3.6k

Users

15

Likes

95

Frequent Posters

goofyCat thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Commentator Level 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: aparnauma

[

Just because something is not a norm according to the society that doesn't make it wrong.

For me the move was not liked because I wanted to see the single mother,it gave Dsa a chance to interfere in her life and not because I thought that move was inappropriate.



Exactly my thoughts.

We see examples around us in real life, how youngsters have to give up to elder's wishes, just because they don't want to hurt them. Doesn't mean they are not capable of managing on their own.

Anyways, these discussions always go into endless loops, so better I stop here.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: russhmeSS


The intimacy comment was related to some other post.
Yes, moving on was not easy. I didn't claim that. Yes, it took long time for Anandi to move on. But once she moved on, she never looked back. Same was the case with Jagya. So the intimacy was never a problem for them after they moved on with their respective partners.

When Jagya came back to Anandi leaving Gauri, she was already committed to Shiv. Though she was in zombie state, she was very clear about one thing that she will never let down Shiv and his family and stick to the relationship irrespective of the circumstances in which she got into it. So there was no question of accepting Jagya back as her partner. Not accepting Jagya had nothing to do with intimacy.

Can't comment anything on the situation that you shared, because I have no insight into the background or circumstances. But I don't see any reason why marriage should affect status of any girl as daughter in her house, even if the she is daughter-in-law turned daughter. More than how society looks at such relationships, it is about how you look at your own relationships. Probably in Anandi and Singh's case CVs wanted it to go that way. They didn't feel that Anandi lost her status as daughter in the house after all these years.

They had difficulty in moving on but once they moved on they never looked back on those days when they were husband and wife though they continued to care for each other as friends.

@red 👏This is what I have been trying to say.It's not society's opinion that should dictate one's relationships but what one feels about the person that should shape the relationships.
Anandi never saw Singhs as any different from her own parents and they never saw her someone who is not part of the family.For them the status of JA marriage did not matter in their relationship.

Through Anandi and Singh's relationship they wanted to show that though there was so much love in that relationship the marriage did not survive because it happened at an age that shouldn't happen.Jagya may have failed Anandi as her husband but as a friend he was there for her.This is what they wanted to show through Singhs and Anandi. The evil tradition cast a shadow on their interpersonal relationships and hurt them all but it is the humanity and their innate goodness that healed the wounds that child marriage caused.
Dsa and Jagya being there for Anandi when she was in need of support post her husband's death and Nandini's kidnap is to show that relationships matter more than the society's diktats.

1013962 thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#33
Anandi parlk sudhar gayi, Jagya gum suda - phir bhi ex ex ex.
Anyway post leap story what ever be the reason did not go well with the viewers.
Post post leap is a big flop.
😃😃
I think there will be one more leap to stop the show.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: russhmeSS



Exactly my thoughts.

We see examples around us in real life, how youngsters have to give up to elder's wishes, just because they don't want to hurt them. Doesn't mean they are not capable of managing on their own.

Anyways, these discussions always go into endless loops, so better I stop here.

It was because of Dsa's wish she stayed on in BH.in the end they gave us unequivocal evidence of Dsa's love for her Chidakali. She took the bullet meant for Anandi.Obviously this love Dsa had for her made it difficult for her to say no to Dsa's wishes that she stay in BH.
This was the same Anandi who went against Dsa to help Mangala simply because helping Mangala was something to do with her beliefs which she would not give up under any circumstances.

You are right it is better to stop here.

Simply put Anandi cared a damn when it came to what society thought about her but when it came to the wishes of her loved ones she found it difficult to say no to them.
Missesha thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: russhmeSS



Can't comment anything on the situation that you shared, because I have no insight into the background or circumstances. But I don't see any reason why marriage should affect status of any girl as daughter in her house, even if the she is daughter-in-law turned daughter. More than how society looks at such relationships, it is about how you look at your own relationships. Probably in Anandi and Singh's case CVs wanted it to go that way. They didn't feel that Anandi lost her status as daughter in the house after all these years.


@ Bold: I agree with you on that part. If I were Anandi (i.e. Anandi's circumstance but my thought process), I would never go back to Jagya's house or a house where he rightfully lives. Simply because I don't have any need to go there. He was my ex-husband, and therefore he is my past, he doesn't need to be party to my future (even as a friend).

Secondly, it will be awkward for Ganga, even if we all are very confident that we have put our "intimacy levels" far behind.

- Thirdly, what will I tell my kids, of what relationship do I share with Jagya, and who are BH folks to me and to them?

- And why should my kids grow up in my Ex's place and see him as a father figure or as the only elderly male model? Instead why can't I bring them up my way or the Shekhars way in Alok or daddu's presence.

- Besides, I also have my self-respect.

The makers may have wanted to show that Anandi meant a lot to BH folks, but in the interim they did too much of injustice to all other relationships, by bringing back A to BH.

So for me, it doesn't go well that Anandi had Jagya / Dsa as her only source of strength and support, and today her kids live as orphans / goons etc. I cannot support such an arrangement in real life. Anandi's steps of going back to BH doesn't bring about any transformation to the larger society or it's beliefs, but these are just backward steps taken by a woman who lived a clumsy lifestyle. And living with her Ex, adds that extra bit of oil to the fire.

I mean if viewers think, Anandi staying in BH was not inappropriate or it is acceptable, it's their choice, but I am quite strong that from social, emotional or financial point of view, Anandi living in BH was highly inappropriate.

Would end it here 😊
Shinya thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#36
Are people saying here it is so easy to forget the intimate relationship you had with a man and live with him in the same house like friends as if there was no past ?

"Moving on" does not mean losing memory or self-respect..

Moving on is putting the past behind and starting afresh... if the ex-husband is still in your life and you live in the same house as he is and if you have to run to him for every little help, how have you moved on?



Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".