Originally posted by: Raji9
That was my reply why I was not outraged about Abhi being wronged all the while ..
At every instance Pragya or Dadi kept on saying about the facts are hidden from him and the things are not how he sees ..He still dont do any thing except taking a mental note ..
And about significant clues .. below are some of them
Police station incident with nikhil ,
Abhi ask Pragya but did she provide the Right Answer
Tanu at Lawyers office,
Everyone at Lawyer Office, not only Tanu.. After all he asked Pragya whether She provided the Straight Answer
Divorce papers drama
Tanu cheated Pragya in divorce and Pragya & Team did the same.. Even HE dont want to marry her, his mind voice says whatever HE is doing is Wrong.. So why to doubt them.. I am not getting the point here..
After Holi incidence
HE is not in presence itself.. Even Pragya talks so much non sense with Tanu.. And Tanu gave a Clever answer for Dadi question..
Pragya stopping Tabhi marriage
ha ha.. If not Pragya Abhi itself will stop.. Anyways She misguided HIM with responsibilty and then she stops the marriage.. Does it worth... HE believes SHE loves HIM and so SHE stopped.. Without misguidance if She did something then I will think about it
Pragya told him Tanu has hramed Sarla Ma
Right Statement at Wrong Situation.. Why NOT when searching Sarla ma and why SO at the wrong timings
Hospital scene
Even the team is shocked about the happenings.. Also Tanu is clearly proved as a Victim there
When one can defend him as much as he has reasons to ignore the clues.. The same amount of reasoning can be done to give an eye on them as this is his life .. And he willingly ignored all the conspiracies going behind him..
When no one misguide HIM and stops twisting the tongue for each and every word spoken, HE will think untill then No use..
There is lot of difference between Ma believing Abhi as baby daddy and Abhi believing Ma as chor and politely asking her "why did you steal"
Abhi agreed or at least never suspected that he is father , then it none of the others business to suspect that ..Here she is telling that she did not do theft.. Dadi was insisting that it could be framed one ..Purab was defending Sarla Ma .. he could have given an ear to any one them before putting that question and impression before Ma
Thats why HE shut all their mouth and ask them to leave the matter.. Anyways HE will Save Ma also
Yes I agree it is equally regressive as Puneet and Purvi case ..But that does make his insulting Ma correct in any way..
It is a Tit for Tat to Sarla ma.. Nothing to explain much