Why So Much Hatred For Hrithik Roshan? - Page 9

Originally posted by: anonymous39

^I don't think most people really care about the cheating. Almost everyone in BW cheats so nobody is scandalized by that.

It's just that Hrithik took it too far believing in his own power by threatening her and demanding a public apology. It's really disgusting if you use whatever you got in your old relationship, like naked pictures, to slyly bully her into shutting up so you can maintain your image.

Originally posted by: NathuPyare

You seem to have read his legal notice quite well (too well) ... but you still didn't reply whether Hritik mentioned about sending any PRIVATE email to kangana warning her about her innuendos, in his private legal notice😛? If not then how can you justify Hritik threatening (or asking, if it pleases you 😉) Kangana to apologize publicly (that too no less than in a press conference 😆) by discretely (read slyly) sending her a 'private' legal notice to do so...naively assuming that people wd not ask kangana what forced her to take the drastic step of apologizing Hritik in a press conference (would his 'private' legal notice have remained private then too?😆 it's good that Kangana leaked the info abt his legal suit, if she indeed was the one 👍🏼).

No one believes that hritik could repeatedly hack Kangana email... there's always other people available to do your dirty deeds if you have the moolah! 😃

whose defence is smoke and mirrors we will see... as far as I am concerned I'm getting nothing to defend kangana here so ... tada! 😎

Originally posted by: Nova19

I seem to have read his legal notice too well. Really? I read hers equally well - you should try it because just the part leaked is full of holes. 😆

He said he never replied to her emails so probably no written proof of him telling her to get lost. AND? Both legal notices say he told her at a party in May 2014 she was corresponding with someone else. She says (legal notice 🤓) she felt "betrayed and hurt" and AFTER THAT proceeded to send him 1439 unrequited emails to his real email address. Do you really believe it's more plausible for her to have sent that many emails with no response and NOT have realized he wasn't in to her (good lord that makes her sound sad) than for him to have diplomatically ignored her emails and hoped she give up? If another obsessed fan sends him 1400 unanswered emails and then tells the media they used to be in a relationship and he was part of it because he didn't block her would that be okay or is it only okay if she is a celebrity too?

He asked her to clarify her prior statement in a press conference i.e. say she wasn't referring to him as the ex doing silly things. She could easily have done so - he wasn't even part of A3 - no need for further clarification.

His position - on the record - is that they did NOT have any relationship. Unequivocal, clear, and straight forward.

Her position - on the record - is he didn't block her emails, he exaggerates because she "only" sent 1439 unanswered emails, and they had a "social" relationship because the Roshans came to her party and invited her to their birthday parties (ironically one of the parties she singles out is his father's that most of Bollywood attended). Even in the follow up interview after the "silly" quote where she refrains from using his name but is clearly talking about him because the question was whether his tweet hurt her the VERY FIRST thing she said was, people can have different perspectives on the past... (right before she accuses him of slyly pursuing her...) Really? Difference of perspective? So she was saying the "relationship" was so minor (or nonexistent) she admits he may have failed to perceive it happened but even so claimed he was slyly pursuing her? Does that make any sense? Even she has never openly claimed they are having/were having a relationship. Why? A real relationship is NOT a matter of perspective.

Originally posted by: Nova19

I seem to have read his legal notice too well. Really? I read hers equally well - you should try it because just the part leaked is full of holes.😆

He said he never replied to her emails so probably no written proof of him telling her to get lost. AND? Both legal notices say he told her at a party in May 2014 she was corresponding with someone else. She says (legal notice 🤓) she felt "betrayed and hurt" and AFTER THAT proceeded to send him 1439 unrequited emails to his real email address. Do you really believe it's more plausible for her to have sent that many emails with no response and NOT have realized he wasn't in to her (good lord that makes her sound sad) than for him to have diplomatically ignored her emails and hoped she give up? If another obsessed fan sends him 1400 unanswered emails and then tells the media they used to be in a relationship and he was part of it because he didn't block her would that be okay or is it only okay if she is a celebrity too?

He asked her to clarify her prior statement in a press conference i.e. say she wasn't referring to him as the ex doing silly things. She could easily have done so - he wasn't even part of A3 - no need for further clarification.

His position - on the record - is that they did NOT have any relationship. Unequivocal, clear, and straight forward.

Her position - on the record - is he didn't block her emails, he exaggerates because she "only" sent 1439 unanswered emails, and they had a "social" relationship because the Roshans came to her party and invited her to their birthday parties (ironically one of the parties she singles out is his father's that most of Bollywood attended). Even in the follow up interview after the "silly" quote where she refrains from using his name but is clearly talking about him because the question was whether his tweet hurt her the VERY FIRST thing she said was, people can have different perspectives on the past... (right before she accuses him of slyly pursuing her...) Really? Difference of perspective? So she was saying the "relationship" was so minor (or nonexistent) she admits he may have failed to perceive it happened but even so claimed he was slyly pursuing her? Does that make any sense? Even she has never openly claimed they are having/were having a relationship. Why? A real relationship is NOT a matter of perspective.