Why So Much Hatred For Hrithik Roshan? - Page 8

Originally posted by: PAcino

He ain't that important...He can lay off his psycho-babble BS & learn to repect woman...Not blame his wife for divorce & his GFs for their mental condition...Everyone & his Dog has seen his tweets..So if there's someone who needs a mind doctor it is him!!!

Also I hope his fans show the same open mindedness when they pass judgement on other actors!

Funny how the haters of Hrithik and the divorce make no mention of Arjun Rampal who was dragged into this and it almost ended his marriage. If anyone should dislike Hrithik it should be him.

Why is he also not discussed aswell? Because he is a man.

Originally posted by: Atomicbomb

I think its people who have always had a grudge with him and now is there chance to hate him openly.

Originally posted by: Nova19

Interesting questions. Ignoring bad news for as long as possible hoping it goes away is his usual approach to everything. It's what he tried with Kareena, Barbara, even his separation. When there were only blinds linking him with Kangana he said in interviews actresses were using him for publicity. When there was the first article openly naming him as Kangana's mystery man, he immediately (and angrily) tweeted a denial which is VERY unusual for him. In retrospect, since I TRY to be fair his mention of psychiatrists (for the journalists) in that tweet could have been meant as a threat to her if she really does have some diagnosis in truth. I think he continued to try to mostly ignore it and hope she stopped until she reached a point where she was saying things being taken as confirmation by journalists. Should he have proceeded then? In retrospect, probably not. But he clearly felt she had crossed or was about to cross some line.

Why didn't he block her? I do not know but I don't accept that as any proof of encouragement. I get tons of spam I haven't yet blocked - I am not encouraging Horoscopes Daily 😆. I should imagine he gets more email than I do and I rarely open or delete nuisance emails. Why should he? The most nefarious option is he was saving it to use against her if he needed. Not exactly the moral high ground but honestly if I was in his situation with a person who, at best has no filter and a vivid imagination and at worst is either delusional or a self serving liar, I probably would have saved proof of harassment too so I don't blame him. Adhyanan claimed she harassed him but was dismissed because he had no proof.

Why didn't he accuse her publicly before now? Look at what's happening to him because he tried to privately call her on it.

Originally posted by: NathuPyare

It's interesting that you mention the word 'privately' so frequently in context of Hritik.🤓 Funny, he sends Kangana a 'private' legal notice, asking her to apologize to him publicly!😆 and even more surprising is that Hritik assumed that a person like Kangana would keep his implied threat/warning (whatever) conveniently private to herself without a backlash.😳

Furthermore, even though you may have a point' about Hritik reaching a certain tolerance point there may also be a different side to the story. may be Hritik actually enjoyed the attention of the 'i'm sure wonderful women' (actresses going gaga over him, pursuing him, stalking him... ) but as soon as Kangana tried to give their fling a name (and please don't say Hritik was as loyal to his wife as he wd like us to believe...one good ex. was barbara) she crossed a boundary deserving a punishment no less than a public apology (not a private apology, mind you).😛

as far as spam is concerned... i do mark messages as spam and even report them when the sender persists... and if i were as busy as Hritik then i wd have surely blocked/reported as spam those mails (rather than getting my mailbox overloaded with spam or important mails getting overshadowed by junk...and that too for apprx 2 years continuously @ 50 mails/day😆) or at least have given the sender a PRIVATE WARNING.😛 Can Hritik produce any such evidence that he warned kangana not to stalk him or send him those emails and yet she persisted... if yes then indeed he is justified in sending her a legal notice... otherwise I don't believe in that bs of harassment by Kangana!

Originally posted by: starstruckk

By the way is this picture edited or is this really a scene from Krishh? 😆

It's a real scene 😆

Originally posted by: Nova19

I keep using the word private to differentiate her behavior from his. For example some people talk like he or his lawyer called Zoom TV and told them she had Aspergers.

I have never claimed he's innocent and at one time I thought they more than likely did have a fling (but now think less likely I admit). I also admit he is probably not that bright - but that works for him here, who believes he could repeatedly hack her email?

I am late for a lunch reservation but can't leave without mentioning you just gave another great example of her lawyer distorting and distracting...His legal notice said up to 50 emails per day which means on at least one day she sent at least 50 emails. Her lawyer misquoted it as 50 per day and then used bad math as "proof" that he was exaggerating. Her "defense" is smoke and mirrors. If she had a better defense she would produce it. If he starts publicly producing her emails he will be crucified.

don't know abt others..
bt some of the facts that glaringly screams against Hritik is :

1.why did he tweet chances of that romancing pope tweet?
its like yelling hey i dnt have whiskers proves i did nt drink that milk 😆

2.he states kangana sent him some over 1400 emails..now if he was
disinterested then why nt simply block her?or complain against her
why silently sitting n martyring himself?n why is it now that he labels the charges?
in one day 1400 n over odd emails can not be sent..it proves the relationship
lasted long enough..

3.kangana was in the kites..
much prior to krish 3..
the acquaintance did nt make him doubt kangana is mental during the kites shooting?
why take her in krish 3?should she nt be avoided knowing her past activities?
can hritik deny that he was well aware of the inside news of kangana n her past life?
we being non-bollywood entities are aware of kanganas affinity towards older men n
her succumbing to married men so is hritik the actual "Jadu" here who being the alien is
unaware of kangana's traits/vices/characteristics?😆


n if ppl called Mastani's love in BM as love is blind love knows nothing bt being loved
in return of love..n does nt term it as home wrecker then why terming kangana as
home wrecker now?come on say it that love is all that matters morality go to hell 😆
now scream love is pure even if two sons of hritik loose their parents ...
all that matters is love is it nt?then why is kangana at fault now for falling in love
with a married man?😆 n why even blame hritik?poor he has no control over his passion
n emotions na?hritik ne ayeashi nahin ki...😆

Originally posted by: JustMySelf

don't know abt others..
bt some of the facts that glaringly screams against Hritik is :

1.why did he tweet chances of that romancing pope tweet?
its like yelling hey i dnt have whiskers proves i did nt drink that milk 😆

2.he states kangana sent him some over 1400 emails..now if he was
disinterested then why nt simply block her?or complain against her
why silently sitting n martyring himself?n why is it now that he labels the charges?
in one day 1400 n over odd emails can not be sent..it proves the relationship
lasted long enough..

3.kangana was in the kites..
much prior to krish 3..
the acquaintance did nt make him doubt kangana is mental during the kites shooting?
why take her in krish 3?should she nt be avoided knowing her past activities?
can hritik deny that he was well aware of the inside news of kangana n her past life?
we being non-bollywood entities are aware of kanganas affinity towards older men n
her succumbing to married men so is hritik the actual "Jadu" here who being the alien is
unaware of kangana's traits/vices/characteristics?😆


n if ppl called Mastani's love in BM as love is blind love knows nothing bt being loved
in return of love..n does nt term it as home wrecker then why terming kangana as
home wrecker now?come on say it that love is all that matters morality go to hell 😆
now scream love is pure even if two sons of hritik loose their parents ...
all that matters is love is it nt?then why is kangana at fault now for falling in love
with a married man?😆 n why even blame hritik?poor he has no control over his passion
n emotions na?hritik ne ayeashi nahin ki...😆

damn it you are just to good👏

I don't think Kangana supporters understand. You dislike Hrithik for cheating which is justified. He did. No one is questioning that.

Putting all the blame on him for Kangana situation is wrong.


Kangana is not an innocent victim terrorised by a big bad wolf

She participated in the affair knowing he was married. She was not forced.

Since it did not work out and affairs rarely do she is hurt and seen as the victim.

She has no one to blame but herself.

Third time she has messed with married men.

Its her own stupidity to be on her third.

^I don't think most people really care about the cheating. Almost everyone in BW cheats so nobody is scandalized by that.