Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@Bertie it is an amalgam of many stories, including literature and folklores. It is not strictly Ramayana. For me the show gives more importance to humanity than divinity in the central characters. Since I am a rational person I am fine with as long as the message coming out is correct.
Costumes are a bit let down as it looks somewhat modern than that of those era, especially the dresses of the ladies. Otherwise I am fine.
To see the distortions, issues from a purists point of view you can visit the distortion thread.
@shruti as this not the typical ramayana a modern adaption is bassically a love story of Sita and rama and the challenges they face ...its actually highlightinh the human aspect rather than divine...
if we see that the dresses are absouletly apt for todays generation because they are highlighting the contrast between...AYODHA AND MITHILA...today i think 48 percenty of youth are confuse of where mithila and ayodha was situated because the geographical dimension of country compel them to think so..
i must say the dreeses are done by so much of reachearch if we say mithila a one is able to distingiish that it was situated at bihar...because the madhubani paintind one on sitas drees and even janaka too...highly depicts its uniquness...
and also the use of bhagalpuri silk which one and only u get to see in bihar depicts beautifully..
and now if we come to ayodhda...the use of extra gold and banarisi raw sil materila one is evident from it ayodha is ...no less situated in Up...(present...)...UP
so it just that to highligh the contrast and to connected to the youth they have experimented with clothes liitle but surely keeping in mind the ancientness also...
which i think a quite succesful effort👏its just my POV...