Children of Mangala - DTN Pg 2 - Page 6

Originally posted by: kikyo

Talking about goodness then the goodness in Nimboli has not come from any other person other than Mangala but people criticize Mangala for Nimboli's sufferings saying she could avoid them then measuring Bhairon and Sumitra with same yardstick they could avoid the sufferings of their children they were in better position to avoid them than Mangala especially Bhairon but what Bhairon and Sumitra do ? they made their own children suffer Bhairon and Sumitra 's children suffered because of their parents wrong decisions , their weaknesses , their failures

i believe this was the point that was raised here Mangala is criticized for Nimboli's sufferings but Bhairon and Sumi are hailed ? why ? Bhairon and Sumi could avoid the sufferings that their children faced Jagya and Sugna did not ask their parents do their child marriage Bhairon had education with him Did he not realize its not fair with children to tie them in this bond in such young age Bhairon and Sumi should be more understanding because both were forced in such circumstances that they had to sacrifice their dreams and take adult responsibilities before their age so should they not have made sure their children live their dreams ?No they both got Sugna married in childhood and brainwashed her Pratap is her everything and when Sugna became teenage widow then what did Bhairon and Sumi do to build her life? Nothing rather Dadisaa made Sugna's life a hell and these two so called most righteous parents in the world stood and watched the torture , it was third person shyam who came like a knight in shining armor in sugna's life and helped this damsel in distress and made her life

How ironic. It is being held against Mangala that she did not use the social worker's visiting card to contact her and seek help for Urmi.


Anandi showed her a way which M for her own selfish reasons did not accept.

Ok. Mangala did wrong,

But even assuming Mangala had contacted Anandi, would that have been of any help to Urmi?

No way judging by what Anandi did to Urmi when the opportunity to help her presented itself. Anandi promised in court that she would take Urmi's responsibility and then coolly, treacherously forgot all about it.

Given this where is the guarantee that she would have helped Urmi if M had contacted her? In all probability she would have promised Mangala all help and then pretended as if that never happened.

The Urmi problem came directly before Anandi and she betrayed her after promising in court to help.

Why on earth would she have helped U when indirectly approached by Mangala?

After all the same logic would apply; Urmi was happier staying with Kamlii. Urmi was not interested in going with the social worker.

So why is it expected of M that she should have sought out a social worker who has shown no responsibility towards Urmi even after promising to take care of her?

Why is Mangala faulted for not seeking out Anandi and not Anandi who went back on her promise?

Originally posted by: libsrocks

Clearly their messages are full of crap considering they, themselves, scratch them out for convenience! Like adoption, second marriage, involvement of widows in marriages, child marriage and etc.

Random social messages will not serve. People watch the show for entertainment mainly. BV's social messages are half baked and half hearted. What was the necessity for a social message during fancy dress competition? If they wanted to push adoption as a social message, Amol should have been with Anandi now. If they wanted widow marriage successful, why Shiv had to die? Why bal vivah track for Nandini after all those efforts?

Sumi got flak for her negativity during Ganga episode. No one gets away with negativity.

Bhairon was weak in front of his mother. So even orthodox Basant made more impression than a weak Bhairon.

Dadisa was hated for the longest period.

Weak persons get contempt. They make us feel irritated. Including leads who cant say no in certain circumstances. But outright negativity is a different ball game.

If Bal Vivah is a punishable crime, why only fathers are arrested? Why Harki and Urmi's mother are not arrested? If it is with retrospective effect many have to be arrested.