🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: Super8 - M52: IND vs WI🏏
🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: PAK vs SL,Super 8🏏
US, Israel attack Iran : Trump announces ‘major combat operations’🔥
MAIRA HELPS MUKTI 28.2
BAKING CLASSES 01.3
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: Super8 - M51: ZIM vs SA🏏
Lets be Honest
People are live streaming war
Rajpal Yadav Starts Social Media Channels
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@adi that scene was beautiful. But that was also symbolic of the princes need to transform from open equitable life style to closed unequitable style of living. And yes it is difficult. The place where you have so much things for company and open air, suddenly with all riches you are alone.
Thank you Neira dear. I guess that is your name. More people reading means more interest to write. 😃
Originally posted by: Ramyalaxmi
I like ur take shruthi. I think here the main problem was the security who denied the entry to the front for the poor old lady. Yes, he followed the order of his superior but the chain goes on and on. So it was either the king or the minister who passed the order of such an arrangement. Thus it means either he does not want to hear the problems of poor or it means he fulfilled the wishes of people according to their status. I knew Dhasarath was never a king with such ignorance. So here i feel to raise the image of Lord Ram they have ruined the character of dhasarath. It was not the problem of seating arrangement even he could have waited long to listen to the rest of the people.
In a way Dhasarath was right, Ram tried to give importance to even the washerman which forced him to send sita to forest.Our ancestors and our customs are absolutely perfect but seriously our understanding is wrong.I liked the way how sita changed the mood of her sisters.
I understand that Dhasarath was not equalto Ram, but the king dhasarath who understood the problem of mithila people was not aware of his own people problem does not seems to be acceptable.
@Ramya,Here I have a slightly different opinion.Sure Dasharath is a great king. But still , we cannot deny the fact that Rama as a king is more able king.There is for some reason, that a near perfect Rajya is given the name " RamaRajya "., where there is equality, peace and happiness every where, through all sections.So, there are few of these points even Dasharath had overlooked, which would have been later taken care by Rama.As per my understanding Raghuvamsi's are mostly known for the adherence to their 'vachan' and Dasharath was one such king, who indeed kept up to that tradition, in addition to being a good King.But he was never equated with Rama.I hope I made sense 😕