First love--- or no love at all?? Is it???

Todays SwaLak eye lock seems to have left an intense mark on many.. The question rises again... First love, should it have won?? Why did that story remain incomplete? Why is it that second love become a lead in Swara's case?

First love is an experience which remains forver.. Mainly because it has all the firsts... the first racing pulses, skipped beats, the first bitter sweet agony, the walking in the air feel... all the feelings associated with the first blush of love become a special memory.. But first love might not always be true love..

Love needs trust, companionship, understanding, adjustment and a lot more... sometimes what we think as love fails to offer us all these things.. And then with the broken heart we gather all the love they no longer wanted and rebuild ourselves. And then unknowingly someone comes along and gives us everything that are important.. things that lacked before.. and then the definition of love changes.. it becomes deeper, intense and then we realise that this was love and everything before was just meaningless..

I am not saying first love doesnt work out.. some lucky people find everything they are looking for in the first person they fall in love with.. but it doesnt make the love of someone who finds love in their second third or fourth time any less

Yes first love is special because it is naive, unrealistically hopeful and mostly pehla nasha kind.. it opens the doors to that feeling that is the most beautiful feeling in the world- feeling of being in love

But first love need not be the last love or be love at all... In fact many times first love teaches us to value love when it comes, understand it better..

First love is a feeling

True love is breath.

Think, if everyone married the first person they ever loved very few people would find soulmates

there is nothing called first love second love...true love fake love...these r all filmy idioms...
wen we care abt smone deeply to the extent that we care abt them more than our life...thats love...ab wo insaan lyf me phla ho ya dusra...dsnt matter...
e.g...i love my parents nd sis nd m willing to sacrifice anything for them... bt i wont put that risk for my relatives nd other ppl...
in that pyaar wala love...wat we witnessed as pain...that pain isnt abt frst luv...its jst luv...we cannot term it jst infatuation as sm already did...swara lakshya do love each other...they still do...bt they lack trust...way too much...nd it isnt smthing petty to ignore...if cvs decide to unite them...they need to actually show the buildback of trust btwn them... nonetheless...their love is love...nothing less...
sanskar loves swara a lot...bt this lovestory is onesided...so staying in the trap will be stupid bt then sanskar will be the victim...after doing so much...he is still alone in terms of love...wedding is useless if u dnt even luv each other...bt lets give them tym...as i was saying...it wud be unfair to sanskaar bt then again... we dnt get evrything we want...
m still confused whom i want swara to be with so jst going with the flow...bt watever cvs decides...it should be well justified...if with lakshya...then they both need a brk ti work on their issues nd broken heart...if with sanky ..it shudnt be like..'swara woke up one day nd felt...lets start loving sanskar lakshya jaaye bhaad me' no...they need to show that she dsnt love as deeply as earlier nd how she fell for sanky...

Ofcourse love should win in the end but swalak is not happening for sometime as its now Swasan Time after all it was indeed meant to be a love triangle b/w Sanskar Swara Lakshya so CVs r getting good response from Swalak to Swasan so they r playing their cards kabhi Swalak kabhi Swasan

Originally posted by: Au_Revoir

there is nothing called first love second love...true love fake love...these r all filmy idioms...
wen we care abt smone deeply to the extent that we care abt them more than our life...thats love...ab wo insaan lyf me phla ho ya dusra...dsnt matter...
e.g...i love my parents nd sis nd m willing to sacrifice anything for them... bt i wont put that risk for my relatives nd other ppl...
in that pyaar wala love...wat we witnessed as pain...that pain isnt abt frst luv...its jst luv...we cannot term it jst infatuation as sm already did...swara lakshya do love each other...they still do...bt they lack trust...way too much...nd it isnt smthing petty to ignore...if cvs decide to unite them...they need to actually show the buildback of trust btwn them... nonetheless...their love is love...nothing less...
sanskar loves swara a lot...bt this lovestory is onesided...so staying in the trap will be stupid bt then sanskar will be the victim...after doing so much...he is still alone in terms of love...wedding is useless if u dnt even luv each other...bt lets give them tym...as i was saying...it wud be unfair to sanskaar bt then again... we dnt get evrything we want...
m still confused whom i want swara to be with so jst going with the flow...bt watever cvs decides...it should be well justified...if with lakshya...then they both need a brk ti work on their issues nd broken heart...if with sanky ..it shudnt be like..'swara woke up one day nd felt...lets start loving sanskar lakshya jaaye bhaad me' no...they need to show that she dsnt love as deeply as earlier nd how she fell for sanky...

Originally posted by: aashti

Very good points.. I, however, do not agree with them. When
I say First love I don't mean love per se.. I mean Infatuation, crush whatever
it may be which, we, in our naivet term as love. It is a term coined for the
first feelings of physical and emotional attraction. Nothing more. Nothing
less.

I'm not a believer of Love is Love. If I go by that
kinda logic I will have loved more people than I want to think. The love we
feel for parents/ family is different.. We love them but we are not in love with them. You might love someone and then go ahead and
only feel apathy towards them.. What kind of love is it that got erased through
time? Yes I believe it is possible to love more than one person but you never
give both of them the same place but I also feel that if you term it as love,
it should last.. Whether in mind as a thought or memory you often look back
wistfully or in a relationship that binds.

But honestly when I speak of SwaLak, I don't think Swara
should go back because if a person can look down at her, believe she can stoop
so low(no matter what proofs are given) then I think he has never loved at all.
Trust was what Swara had on Lakshya when everyone had turned against him and
she stood by him. It is easy to trust when you have all the proofs supporting
your statement.. trust is when you believe in someones word.

While somebody else
would have been worried to death that his bride didn't turn up, he was busy
getting married.. Well marry in haste repent at pleasure, isn't that the idiom?
May be Swara and Lakshya still love' each other and may be sanskars love is
one sided, but Sanskar, unlike Lakshya, has fulfilled every duty that comes
with the word. And at the end of the day the universal truth stands Love is
not enough for a successful marriage'..

In real world SwaSan's marriage would be a successful one while SwaLak would be headed towards divorce courts 3 years down the line..

But this is reel and the success/ failure of marriage and the presence/ absence of love rests in the hands of the writer alone

u must hv ignored my xample on my love for family waland the case with relatives...
wen i talked abt true love or frst love...it wasnt u i pointed out... yes loving smone nd being in love with smone r two diffrnt things...nd i pointed out the same in diffrnt words...
nd abt love is love...where one claims to do anything...if they dnt or cant...it cant be qstned... forbidden lovers bi hote hain...wo bi hain jo parents ki khushi ke liye stay away...that also is love...as i said...trust is imp...very much...bt trust is not the only thing...no sympathies with lakshya or any...
bt my rant was for love...nd not for cou

Originally posted by: Au_Revoir

u must hv ignored my xample on my love for family waland the case with relatives...
wen i talked abt true love or frst love...it wasnt u i pointed out... yes loving smone nd being in love with smone r two diffrnt things...nd i pointed out the same in diffrnt words...
nd abt love is love...where one claims to do anything...if they dnt or cant...it cant be qstned... forbidden lovers bi hote hain...wo bi hain jo parents ki khushi ke liye stay away...that also is love...as i said...trust is imp...very much...bt trust is not the only thing...no sympathies with lakshya or any...
bt my rant was for love...nd not for cou