Originally posted by: coolmale3k
Hello friends. I wanted ask a general question, without any offense to Prashant fans or Amit fans. I followed all final galas of II3 and to my judgement, they both were awesome. But still I think that Amit was going on a better track than Prashant. Three times judges and audience asked him to repeat his song. Infinals judges gave him a standing ovationand he was fully supported on internet forums. On the other hand, Prashant was sometimes critisized by judges, Javed Akhter said him that his voice is not polised and i guesshe was also in bottom 4 in some galas.And now after winning and becoming Indian Idol, I have noticed that on the forums people are still talking about Amit, on every website still a lot are favoring Amit. My question is that what was the key factor that gave Prashant an edge on Amit?and if majority voted for Prashant, then why Amit is still bring favored? My friends, I don't live in India and I don't really know that why people still support Amit whereas Prashant got the majority of votes.Please my friends I didn't intend tobe offensive to anyone. I really congratulate Prashant and his fans for choosing him II3.
I personally like yr question...you r right amit is very favorie among Indians....Parshant is a garbage singer, he was criticized by judges time to time, even anu malik told him that he smokes that why he can not sing...but the thing made him winner is that he speaks nepali.. so the neighbour country nepal support him blindly..they were so biased they igonre talent over regionality..they make free phone both to vote parshant to make a garbage singer an indian idol...
I hate nepal for this and all nepalsee...
Health and Fitness
