Sud police be provided wid AK-47 n AK-56 along wid pistol n revolver?

OriginalJuhi_04 thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 10 years ago
#1
During 26/11, several police died cuz d terrorists had better arms like AK-47n AK-56 compared to police's pistols n revolvers. Since terrorists r again trying to destroy India n recently a terrorist was caught do u think its d time d police's r provided wid AK-47 n AK-56?

Created

Last reply

Replies

6

Views

384

Users

4

Frequent Posters

Unhinged thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#2
I agree Police should have better equipment, however purpose of AK-47 or AK-56 are for armed combat. I think it is over reaction to have Police carry these high end weapons.

What every Police should have is a secure fire arm which is capable to hold a standoff and bullet proof jacket as standard issue. Currently not every police man has access to pistols or revolvers unless it is an escalated incident and they have instructions to carry. See any police on road and all they have is a long stick and hope like shit that bad guys don't have guns.

In situations like 26/11 we need a rapid response unit which is well equipped to handle any situation. We already have units like that however how rapid they are is a question.


Druids thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#3
"To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
Druids thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: Unhinged

I agree Police should have better equipment, however purpose of AK-47 or AK-56 are for armed combat. I think it is over reaction to have Police carry these high end weapons.

What every Police should have is a secure fire arm which is capable to hold a standoff and bullet proof jacket as standard issue. Currently not every police man has access to pistols or revolvers unless it is an escalated incident and they have instructions to carry. See any police on road and all they have is a long stick and hope like shit that bad guys don't have guns.

In situations like 26/11 we need a rapid response unit which is well equipped to handle any situation. We already have units like that however how rapid they are is a question.


Do you know that Hemant Karkare had earlier been posted in Antwerp. Now can you imagine how competitive, ruthless and cutthroat the diamond mafia might be? Did you know Adani was also present at the diamond conference that was going on?


Unhinged thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#5
Gun debate is what it is. There are pro's and con's but one thing is for sure is the number of victims is real. Question here is if Police should have the fire power and Yes they should have enough to perform their duty as best for the changing culture and environment. You cant have law enforcement carrying sticks when the people who they are supposed to stop are going around with guns.

When it comes to civilians carrying guns, India has long way to get there compared to western counties.
OriginalJuhi_04 thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 10 years ago
#6
I recalled a discussion wid my family after 9/11 wen my bro told dat its government's faults for providing 6 ya 9 goliwali bandook instead of AK-47 n AK-56 otherwise many peoples wud have been saved n even many policemen who also sacrificed their lives. So, I thought to make dis post.
1047050 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: angel_juhi04

I recalled a discussion wid my family after 9/11 wen my bro told dat its government's faults for providing 6 ya 9 goliwali bandook instead of AK-47 n AK-56 otherwise many peoples wud have been saved n even many policemen who also sacrificed their lives. So, I thought to make dis post.


Jet fuel melts steel beams @Angeljuhi_04
So the Kalashnikovs would've been of no help in this case. People didn't die of bullets you know. 😊

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".