Siyali's past.. - Page 2

I agreee... [;)]
[COLOR=red]WHAT ABOUT IF V COMBINE 2 THEORIES[/COLOR]

AnVESHA MST HAV GIVEN D BRACELET 2 SIYALI BT COULDNT GIV 2 UTTU DUE 2 SM REASON ...& THEN SHE LOST BOTH SIYALI N UTTU IN AN ACCIDENT . SHE MUST HV ADOPTED SID N GIVEN A BRACELET 2 HIM...SO SIYALI MAY B SIS OF KRISSAN BT NOT OF UTTU N SID. [:$]
bT AT D TYM OF ACCIDENT MAY B SIYALI N UTTU WERE TOGETHER SOO 2 FAMILIES LOST DERE CHILDRENS
So SIDYALI CAN B A COUPLE...
[=D>] [=D>] [=D>]
MySTERY RESOLVED UPTO AN EXTENT [:D]

Originally posted by: arsha_simran

What if siyali was sid's fianc
Like u noe the old traditional families fix the marriages at young age and then they b like bade hokar ye shaadi karengey
And then anvesha gave it to siyali and something happened and bham they got separated 🤣 🤣

Guys like there is no wrong in assumptions but it isn't necessary that if siyali had the bracelet then she is related to the "Rajputs" and there isn't a rule that inky the "Rajput" family wears that
It might b that siyali got it from her parents like they tied in her hand when she was born and then now she gave it to utkarsh
Or moreover u don't noe wat happened to siyali's parents and how they died and the main point is "how come siyali noe abt the karma thing and all" like I don't think that in the orphanage the trio was leaving teaches things like that.
Siyali and her past must unfold and then more assumptions will b out
Presently i would suggest lets just enjoy the show though it is difficult

But the assumptions made they are awesome!!
I am loving the way warriors mind is working!!

Originally posted by: apoorvaarnav

Ok one more theory , S - Siyali and U is Utkarsh. Whereas Sid is Adopted

if S was Siyali Urmila wouldn't have hated her