Sanjay Dutt gets 6 years in Jail. Fair? - Page 26

chalo rahul bhai.... court ne aapko bhi thodi rahat de di 😉

Poaching case: Court upholds Salman Khan jail term

A correspondent | August 24, 2007 | 11:18 IST


A Jodhpur court on Friday turned down actor Salman Khan's appeal against the lower court sentencing him to five years in jail for poaching the chinkara in Rajasthan in 1998.

Salman Khan: Controversy's Child

In April 2006 Khan had been sentenced to five years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 25,000, after which the actor went in appeal against the order.

Originally posted by: kabhi_21

... i said that this are basic evidences and hence an explanation shall be taken for not having them, if the explanation can be relied then its okk.... i did nt take the evidences like eye witness etc into account.... the evidences i took must be there... in any murder case.... a weapon can be the chaku chhuri pistol or a poisonous or other drugs or the thread to have faansi.... the police may not get it... but they have to explain that they tried their best to get it....

if we leave them scotfree like that its just a boost to them to repeat this negligence in all murder cases where accused is politician or a socially well known and powerful person😊

Ok. So a murder happens. There is no murder weapon. The body of the victim is not found either. One person is missing and the presumption is that it is this person who is murdered. Police suspect someone or someone suspects someone. They investigate, interrogate, but cant find sufficient proof. They accuse someone of it, frame a charge and file a case. Matter goes to trial.

How is the Police supposed to give a satisfactory explanation for the inavailability of proper evidence like murder weapon or murdered person's dead body? Satisfactory explanation takes the entire issue on a subjective curve and every person's level of satisfactory explanation is different.....

Where will we go from there?

Excessive Judicial Activism is very rampant these days and that too is bad.

Originally posted by: greatmaratha

Ok. So a murder happens. There is no murder weapon. The body of the victim is not found either. One person is missing and the presumption is that it is this person who is murdered. Police suspect someone or someone suspects someone. They investigate, interrogate, but cant find sufficient proof. They accuse someone of it, frame a charge and file a case. Matter goes to trial.

How is the Police supposed to give a satisfactory explanation for the inavailability of proper evidence like murder weapon or murdered person's dead body? Satisfactory explanation takes the entire issue on a subjective curve and every person's level of satisfactory explanation is different.....

Where will we go from there?

Excessive Judicial Activism is very rampant these days and that too is bad.

based on what u said here, i would nt even admit the case as a judge 😃

Originally posted by: kabhi_21

based on what u said here, i would nt even admit the case as a judge 😃

😕

Originally posted by: greatmaratha

😕

😆 Priya, imagining you sitting there with these expressions cracked me up......🤣

I feel the court was unnecessarily lenient with Sanjay. He deserves more than 6 years esp considering that they will subtract the 16 months he spent in jail last time from the 6 years! 😕 He got away with a relatively lenient sentence simply because he is a celebrity.