Sanjay Dutt gets 6 years in Jail. Fair?

SolidSnake thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#1

http://www.ibnlive.com/news/sanjay-dutt-gets-6-yrs-jail-take n-into-custody/45923-3.html

New Delhi: Actor Sanjay Dutt on Tuesday was awarded six years rigorous imprisonment for illegal possession of weapons in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts.

Dutt, who has already been convicted under the Arms Act, was immediately taken into custody and sent to Mumbai's Arthur Road Jail. He can appeal in the Supreme Court against the TADA court verdict.

Other co-accused Yusuf Nulwalla has been sentenced to five years in prison under the Arms Act for aiding Dutt to dispose of the AK-56 rifle while Karsi Adjania was awarded two years in jail.

As the judgment was being read out a visibly shocked Dutt was seen shivering and holding back tears.

Earlier, Judge PD Kode said, that Dutt attended a dinner party hosted by actor-filmmaker Feroze Khan during the shooting of Yalgaar in December 1992 in Dubai. The party was also attended by gangsters Dawood Ibrahim and Iqbal Mirchi.

Kode added that Dutt not only committed the offense but he also made co-accused Nulwalla commit the offense.

"I can see a chain of crimes committed between Sanjay Dutt and others initiated by the actor," Kode said while reading out the judgment.

Kode however, permitted the actor to take a call from his daughter Trishala in the US.

Kode also heeded Dutt's request that he and his friend Yusuf Nulwalla be kept in the Arthur Road Jail but in different cells.

The judge, who has been holding court in the Arthur Road jail premises, said Dutt should not be kept with hardened criminals but in a proper place with all facilities. His family would be allowed to come and meet him.

Dutt's co-accused Rusi Mullah was granted relief under Probation of Offenders Act because of his age and restricted role in the 1993 Mumbai blasts. Mulla will be released after depositing Rs 1 lakh.

Dutt had been arrested on April 19, 1993 in the case and he spent 16 months behind bars as an undertrial. It raked up a huge controversy when he got bail and walked out of prison in spite of being charged under TADA.

Just three months back, the actor was acquitted on terrorism and conspiracy charges in the same case.

Interestingly, while Dutt was absolved on terrorism and conspiracy charges, his accomplices were found guilty under the TADA.

Manzoor, who had carried the gun from Dutt's bungalow, was found guilty under the TADA. Zaibunissa Kazi was convicted under TADA for concealing the consignment.

But Dutt, who asked for the weapons in the first place and kept them at his residence, was found 'not guilty' under this Act. Dutt had also been accused of ordering the destruction of the weapons. Yet, he got away with a milder rap.

With all 100 convicts in the case having been sentenced, Dutt's punishment ends the trial.

Dutt seeks time to surrender

Sanjay Dutt made an emotional plea for more time to surrender to the special court after the sentence was awarded.

Dutt asked for permission to speak in the court and went to the witness box with folded hands.

"Sir, I made a mistake 14 years ago. Please give me sometime to surrender," he said.

Judge P D Kode of the special TADA court replied, "Everybody makes mistakes." He added that he could not grant more time to Dutt to surrender under the law.

When Dutt's counsel Satish Maneshinde tried to point out that his client's conduct had been excellent throughout, Kode asked Special Public Prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam for his opinion on this matter.

"I appreciate his conduct but there is a legal restraint that a person sentenced to more than three years in prison cannot be granted an extension of bail," Nikam said.

Popular support for Sanju

Commenting upon affidavits filed by public personalities like actor Dilip Kumar in support of Dutt, Judge Kode said these are of no use if there exists material, which says that the actor has indulged in a criminal act.

Dismissing the defence's argument that the weapons were acquired by Dutt for self-defence, Kode said such an acquisition cannot be called "noble", is contrary to the law and indicates scant respect for the law.

"I must say for every citizen, laws of the nation shall be respected. If you don't, I don't expect you to be called a moral person," Kode said.

Kode also observed it was an "eminently dangerous act" as the weapon possessed by Dutt was capable of mass destruction though the accused had not used the weapons.

He pointed out that apart from possessing the weapons, Dutt was a close acquaintance of Anees Ibrahim. Kode, however, said the crimes committed by Dutt and his friends Adajania and Nulwalla were not "anti-social, ghastly, inhuman, immoral or pre-planned" and did not cause any harm to the general public.

--------------

My opinion - YES! Infact he was aquited in the same TADA case (bolded above) in which his friends were convicted.

Created

Last reply

Replies

255

Views

13.6k

Users

34

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

greatmaratha thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 18 years ago
#2
Yes. Every criminal is equal in the eyes of law and no one should be given any special treatment on the strength of his "film star" status or his "Mantri ka ladka" status.
Modesty thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#3
They say justice has prevailed but today as an ordinary Indian citizen I feel very dejected and frustrated.

How come Sanjay Dutt who's not killed even a fly with that illegally acquired Ak47 gets 6 years of RI and Yasin Malik JKLF chief who'd killed many innocent Kashmiri Pandits spent only 4 years in Indian prisons? Why is he roaming freely in my country and making a mockery of our Constitution?

Doesn't it reek of Judiciary's double standards? I strongly believe that Sanjay Dutt has been denied justice. For me tis a very sad day today.

TC.
Edited by Modesty - 18 years ago
sareg thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: greatmaratha

Yes. Every criminal is equal in the eyes of law and no one should be given any special treatment on the strength of his "film star" status or his "Mantri ka ladka" status.

if it was an ordinary citizen like me and you

what would have been the sentence?

sareg thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#5
BTW read --> 'Bapu would've wanted Sanjay to be free'

Somehow a lot of people are feeling like Bal Thackeray today, how does the saffron look in the mirror 😉
Modesty thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: sareg


if it was an ordinary citizen like me and you


what would have been the sentence?



It would have been much lighter if we had conducted ourselves in the same way during the Probation as did Sanjay. Sanjay Dutt is a celebrity so Police and Judiciary just wanna set some sort of example. They r out to prove that nobody is above law and in the process they have punished a harmless person.
sareg thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Modesty



It would have been much lighter if we had conducted ourselves in the same way during the Probation as did Sanjay. Sanjay Dutt is a celebrity so Police and Judiciary just wanna set some sort of example. They r out to prove that nobody is above law and in the process they have punished a harmless person.

you and I would have never gotten out on probation in the first place, everyone seems to be ignoring that

second thing, Bal Thackeray the opposition, and Congress(his sister and everyone by whom his father stood by) are against this sentence.

The police and judiciary have to be commended to be able to stand in opposition of everything political, you got to applaud them for that, normally we say in India they do what the politicians want them to do

SolidSnake thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: Modesty

It would have been much lighter if we had conducted ourselves in the same way during the Probation as did Sanjay. Sanjay Dutt is a celebrity so Police and Judiciary just wanna set some sort of example. They r out to prove that nobody is above law and in the process they have punished a harmless person.

By that logic, no one would get convicted and punished. And Sanjay Dutt got what he deserved, infact due to political connections/influence he was let off in TADA case (ironically in the same TADA case his friends were convicted).

qwertyesque thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#9
Fair ??? Maybe.

But does he deserve this? No I mean I think they should have let him go with a strict warning.. Indian law always has the abilty differentiate a true criminal from others...

By anyt stretch of imagination I dont think he has criminal tendencies - immature ya - criminal no.. 😊
qwertyesque thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: Modesty



It would have been much lighter if we had conducted ourselves in the same way during the Probation as did Sanjay. Sanjay Dutt is a celebrity so Police and Judiciary just wanna set some sort of example. They r out to prove that nobody is above law and in the process they have punished a harmless person.

Well said... Thats exactly the case - as absurd as Martha Stewarts jail sentence... i call it extreme justice.....which loses meaning in real life...

Edited by qwertyesque - 18 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".