Something to Learn from All : Paakhi

Page

Next Last

ILoveRagNa

@ILoveRagNa

Navigator

Posted: 10 years ago

For some reason...

I feel... Pakhi's character could have been much much much better than the way it portrayed.

Let's Look at some good things in her:

Respecting Poor People... (Maybe due to change of track, she was given pathetic dialogues about rich and poor.. but initially.. if we see.. She did have loads of respect for people.. no matter who..!!

Helping Old Lady get the bus, was her entry scene..)

Again except in the end, which was screwed by CVs badly.. she was ready to support truth.. (Kamla ki parvish.. ) against her own family

Umm...

Positivity..!! and always Hopeful ,

Yes word often used is "Delusional"

But is it really that bad?

Imagine, being rejected by a guy... many might have ended up losing their own lives.. yet, she didn't give up.. or say.. on her part, tried her best to keep up with world with smile and decided to even work hard..

I doubt, she would have had any problem with RAGNA .. had she known initially before her marriage...

and even after marriage, seeing your hubby attracted to his REAL SINDOOR wali wife, and offering her life.. was something not anyone can do..

Yes.. things were worse after SUDDEN change in storylines...

After change in storylines..

There was nothing good in her.. all the goodness that was build went in dustbin, when she became pycho lover!!!

But something Good from Worse Part 2

Quote

Frequent Posters

Aria

@Cinnamonn

Inactive

Posted: 10 years ago

Ummm I blame CVS for ruining paakhi,

Paakhi could've been a great addition with sammy helping him unite RagNa.

somewhere down the Lines cvs ruin their own show and needed to get out,Ignoring fans and Sepereating RagNa saying Kamla was the usp ruined it more.

turning paakhi into this crazy person and her marriage to Rags killed the show.

Paakhi's character could've been amazing.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

prishna_fan

@prishna_fan

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: -AriaRai-
Ummm I blame CVS for ruining paakhi,
Paakhi could've been a great addition with sammy helping him unite RagNa.

somewhere down the Lines cvs ruin their own show and needed to get out,Ignoring fans and Sepereating RagNa saying Kamla was the usp ruined it more.

turning paakhi into this crazy person and her marriage to Rags killed the show.

Paakhi's character could've been amazing.

Exactly 👍🏼

But I think even Shirina didn't expect this lol 😆

Quote

Jaz

@Jaz_

Voyager

Posted: 10 years ago

Her character could have been portrayed differently and perhaps be an ally to RagNa if the CVs wanted to go that route however regardless of what was sketched out the actress playing it had zero credability in playing the role, whether her voice modulation, static expressions or lack of screen presence. As a viewer there was no connection. It just never connected from the moment she was introduced, unlike the child version of Pakhi. That's the honest truth!! She'd be better suited in doing ads or print jobs.

Edited by Jaz_ - 10 years ago

Quote

Aria

@Cinnamonn

Inactive

Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: prishna_fan

Exactly 👍🏼

But I think even Shirina didn't expect this lol 😆

I'm sure she didn't😉😆

Quote

Katty

@Cute_Kate

Dazzler

Posted: 10 years ago

To learn From Pakhi???

For change.. I can have something to accept from Kamla. . But Pakhi???

How to snatch things away from poor people and put them down.

Quote

OmkaraKiParvati

@OmkaraKiParvati

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

The CVs wanted to shove RaKhi on to our faces. They wanted to show more of Pakhi. That's y she was made negative. There are many ways in which Pakhi could be shown. Perhaps, if she hadn't been so snatchy and negative, we would have liked her..

Quote

deepu90

@deepu90

Navigator

Posted: 10 years ago

pakhi is bubbly girl but cv's rained her charcter

Quote

ILoveRagNa

@ILoveRagNa

Navigator

Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: -AriaRai-
Ummm I blame CVS for ruining paakhi,
Paakhi could've been a great addition with sammy helping him unite RagNa.

somewhere down the Lines cvs ruin their own show and needed to get out,Ignoring fans and Sepereating RagNa saying Kamla was the usp ruined it more.

turning paakhi into this crazy person and her marriage to Rags killed the show.

Paakhi's character could've been amazing.

No better Answer than this..!!!😳😳😳

I totally agree with you...

Originally posted by: Cute_Kate
To learn From Pakhi???
For change.. I can have something to accept from Kamla. . But Pakhi???

How to snatch things away from poor people and put them down.

Sorry dear, but I differ here. No matter what, there is always something to learn from everyone and everything. Kamla too had some positive points and so did Pakhi,.. If you talk only about snatching, it was she who might have been pretty much neutral in her family. She is the one who stood up when principal blamed Kalpi for her acts, she didn't budge to complain against her own brother; She was the one who in their childhood, made Kalpi wear her dress and let people confuse her to be in her place in party.. remember?

only the thing is that they had been portrayed irrationally.

By no means I am Pakhi fan, or something, even I disliked her from episode 1, but I see it differently, and reason for this post was to encourage everyone to see things differently.😳😳

Originally posted by: Jaz_
Her character could have been portrayed differently and perhaps be an ally to RagNa if the CVs wanted to go that route however regardless of what was sketched out the actress playing it had zero credability in playing the role, whether her voice modulation, static expressions or lack of screen presence. As a viewer there was no connection. It just never connected from the moment she was introduced, unlike the child version of Pakhi. That's the honest truth!! She'd be better suited in doing ads or print jobs.

I ain't gonna comment on actress, she was decent till the time, they both got placed in office, but I was shocked at the portrayal later on. I mean, who wears sleevless and party wear in office? But fine, acceptable and accepted. I decided to ignore it.

Pakhi's looked.. didn't suit her Office going avtaar..

Originally posted by: veeranu
The CVs wanted to shove RaKhi on to our faces. They wanted to show more of Pakhi. That's y she was made negative. There are many ways in which Pakhi could be shown. Perhaps, if she hadn't been so snatchy and negative, we would have liked her..

RaKhi? Isn't that what I have learned from forum is Ramu and Pakhi? Pls. correct me here.

Making negative was never a solution.. They could have avoided that marriage thing, simple... Making her Negative was must .. after and immediately after marriage.. they wasted in trying to show her as good and one who is trying her best kind of bahu.

Originally posted by: deepu90
pakhi is bubbly girl but cv's rained her charcter

Bubbly toh nai, but she was always shown as very possessive person for whom life is bed of roses.. but CVs failed.

Edited by ILoveRagNa - 10 years ago

Quote

-Maggi-

@-Maggi-

Dazzler

Posted: 10 years ago

#10

Pakhi 😆 well you are correct about her character would have been shown better but then they created a wonderful story to show the struggle of a bai to fulfill her dreams and then ruining it with a stupid twist what can when expect from such creative people

the intro and end are opposite 🤢

Quote

1 2

Something to Learn from All : Paakhi

Related Topics

Explore Topics